OrangeWater

OrangeWater — CS2 Stats

US76561198013226651[U:1:52960923]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

1,393Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,099Hours in CS28Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,003Blue band · top ~44.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 29 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,003 -1,096 25 Aug13 Sept · 14 days played
10,36214,237peak 14,23725 Aug13 Sept
14,644Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-04-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,234 below peak (14,237)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 2,997 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches320−17
Win rate33%35%−2pp
K/D0.960.80+0.16
Headshot %53%50%+3pp

Measured 12 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 6 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,413), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate45.1%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy11.3%11.2%12.0%0.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.041.001.02meets
Match win rate44.9%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOrangeWaterFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,003 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning51
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45514Last 10045%Win rateLLWLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility3.9
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.7

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 52% on T to 33% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning5.1
Utility3.9
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time563ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−6.2%
first ⅓ avg 24.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 27 Aug
55%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · cache, 5 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · nuke, 10 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 6 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 70% over 10anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB22111150%-0.00
dust2B21101148%0.01
cacheB2091145%-0.02
nukeD134931%-0.02
infernoS107370%0.02
anubisD82625%-0.02
ancientD62433%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

52,381Lifetime kills
1.04K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
2,526Matches
44.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
45.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
11.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
5,099MVPs
1,057Hours (in match)
2,403Bombs planted
582Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,799
AWP6,046
AUG2,113
SSG 081,557
SCAR-201,294
Negev1,294

Lifetime map wins

6,709dust2
3,448inferno
2,269nuke
1,346vertigo
459train
128cbble
78office
23italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches
67%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno10%0.4012.0
Overpass1100%1.1218.0
Nuke1100%1.6016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
71.0%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
572msReaction time
51.7%T opening success
33.1%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
9.26HE damage / grenade
5.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.0606% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.0320%13 Sept
dust29–130.0015%13 Sept
dust213–70.0219%13 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0414%12 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0023%12 Sept
anubis2–13-0.039%12 Sept
mirage10–13-0.069%12 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0524%12 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0412%12 Sept
inferno13–70.0219%12 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0135%12 Sept
cache13–7-0.0414%11 Sept
cache15–15-0.0417%10 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0512%10 Sept
dust26–13-0.0124%10 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0216%10 Sept
mirage13–100.0225%10 Sept
nuke8–13-0.076%9 Sept
dust213–110.0316%9 Sept
ancient4–130.0015%7 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0019%7 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0029%7 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0028%7 Sept
cache13–80.0511%6 Sept
nuke13–90.0426%6 Sept
mirage13–100.0122%6 Sept
ancient6–20.0211%6 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0628%6 Sept
dust213–7-0.0326%6 Sept
cache13–60.0124%6 Sept
cache15–150.0210%6 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0015%6 Sept
nuke13–110.0119%6 Sept
mirage3–13-0.1220%6 Sept
dust213–60.0338%6 Sept
mirage13–100.0215%6 Sept
dust213–10.0429%6 Sept
dust25–13-0.0524%5 Sept
inferno11–130.068%5 Sept
mirage13–110.0215%5 Sept
dust23–13-0.0216%5 Sept
mirage13–50.0926%5 Sept
nuke9–130.0215%5 Sept
anubis4–13-0.070%5 Sept
dust216–14-0.0410%5 Sept
cache3–13-0.0855%5 Sept
cache6–13-0.0513%1 Sept
cache13–6-0.0319%1 Sept
inferno13–110.0822%1 Sept
dust26–13-0.0518%1 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0446%1 Sept
anubis13–100.0419%1 Sept
cache3–13-0.0324%31 Aug
cache13–11-0.0719%31 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0317%31 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0219%31 Aug
mirage8–130.0221%31 Aug
mirage13–70.0326%31 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0611%31 Aug
dust23–13-0.0426%31 Aug
dust215–15-0.0216%31 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0018%31 Aug
nuke10–130.0122%31 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0432%31 Aug
dust213–90.0233%31 Aug
cache13–6-0.0521%28 Aug
inferno13–110.0126%27 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0744%27 Aug
dust213–30.1233%27 Aug
cache10–130.0418%27 Aug
mirage10–130.0216%26 Aug
dust27–130.0120%25 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0226%25 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0815%25 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0123%25 Aug
ancient13–100.0018%25 Aug
inferno13–80.0011%25 Aug
mirage13–160.0119%25 Aug
dust27–130.0439%25 Aug
anubis5–130.0313%24 Aug
dust213–90.0731%24 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0215%24 Aug
mirage7–10.0243%24 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0417%24 Aug
inferno13–30.1021%24 Aug
cache13–40.0722%24 Aug
mirage15–150.0627%24 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0422%24 Aug
dust27–130.0529%24 Aug
cache13–6-0.0431%16 Jul
dust210–13-0.0324%16 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0814%15 Jul
cache9–13-0.0516%12 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0532%12 Jul
cache11–13-0.0429%9 Jul
cache8–13-0.0427%8 Jul
dust213–30.0541%8 Jul
cache4–130.0123%19 May
cache1–13-0.0131%1 May
cache13–70.0529%29 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →