Noxxi

Noxxi — CS2 Stats

DE76561198012287956[U:1:52022228]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,331Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
3,549Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating15,532Purple band · top ~26.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,532 -2,254 14 Aug – 31 Oct · 10 days played
15,51917,786peak 17,78614 Aug31 Oct
17,786Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-08-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,254 below peak (17,786)
  • -360 over 30 days · steady
  • -2,254 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,468 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate37.8%45.7%46.8%9.0% short
Shot accuracy11.2%12.7%13.0%1.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.891.051.060.17 short
Match win rate41.4%45.7%46.3%4.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 8 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNoxxiFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER15,532 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning54
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–45Last 10055%Win rateLWWWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · −52ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility7.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.4
Utility7.4
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time494ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 494ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–10 · ancient, 13 Sept →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · mirage, 12 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · mirage, 1 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · mirage, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 26anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2618–869%-0.01
mirageB2512–1348%-0.01
ancientS1711–665%0.02
infernoB136–746%-0.01
cacheA95–456%-0.01
anubisD92–722%0.02
vertigo—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

69,315Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
3,797Matches
41.4%Match win rate
37.8%Headshot %
11.2%Shot accuracy
6,884MVPs
1,533Hours (in match)
3,530Bombs planted
732Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP15,283
AK-4714,041
MP73,479
P2501,609
FAMAS1,407

Lifetime map wins

5,856inferno
4,714dust2
2,340nuke
1,632cbble
1,196train
1,152vertigo
92lake
83safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

289Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
79.7ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24257%0.9514.5
Mirage3951%0.9314.0
Ancient3355%0.9214.2
Inferno2544%0.8712.9
Anubis1828%0.9014.3
Cache1050%0.8813.7
Nuke560%0.8614.2
Vertigo580%1.0112.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.3%Headshot accuracy
29.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.8%Spray accuracy
71.0%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
491msReaction time
49.4%T opening success
51.4%CT opening success
0.81Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
9.72HE damage / grenade
13.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.2802% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–130.0016%1 Nov →
ancient13–10-0.0111%1 Nov →
cache13–50.0915%31 Oct →
dust213–60.0221%31 Oct →
cache13–60.0218%3 Oct →
cache10–13-0.088%28 Sept →
mirage13–50.0315%28 Sept →
mirage15–19-0.0121%26 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.1211%26 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0011%26 Sept →
dust28–130.0113%26 Sept →
dust213–80.0115%20 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0521%20 Sept →
ancient13–70.0010%19 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.057%19 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0228%19 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0515%19 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0313%18 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0321%17 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0510%14 Sept →
dust213–100.0816%13 Sept →
ancient7–130.0116%13 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0214%13 Sept →
ancient13–100.1118%13 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0312%13 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0213%13 Sept →
cache18–22-0.009%13 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0510%13 Sept →
mirage13–70.0213%12 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0113%12 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0111%12 Sept →
mirage9–130.0732%12 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0524%11 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0621%11 Sept →
ancient13–50.0622%11 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0623%11 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0510%8 Sept →
dust213–70.049%8 Sept →
dust213–70.0416%6 Sept →
inferno13–70.0825%6 Sept →
anubis8–130.038%6 Sept →
anubis11–130.029%6 Sept →
dust27–13-0.1021%6 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.066%5 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0314%5 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0512%5 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.086%5 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0331%5 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0216%5 Sept →
mirage5–130.0511%5 Sept →
mirage13–100.0416%4 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0410%4 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0314%4 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.056%4 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0218%4 Sept →
dust213–10-0.018%4 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0113%4 Sept →
ancient16–130.0312%3 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0315%3 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0212%3 Sept →
anubis11–130.0122%3 Sept →
mirage13–40.0117%3 Sept →
ancient13–70.0216%2 Sept →
anubis13–100.0818%2 Sept →
dust213–60.0720%2 Sept →
anubis13–70.084%2 Sept →
anubis9–130.0123%1 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0413%1 Sept →
dust211–130.0519%1 Sept →
ancient13–50.0814%1 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0526%1 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.1112%1 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0118%1 Sept →
dust213–30.0524%1 Sept →
mirage13–110.058%1 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0214%1 Sept →
mirage10–130.0125%31 Aug →
dust28–130.0016%31 Aug →
ancient11–130.0412%31 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0115%31 Aug →
inferno13–30.0511%31 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0217%31 Aug →
ancient10–130.0313%31 Aug →
vertigo19–150.0312%31 Aug →
ancient13–60.0722%31 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0712%31 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0726%31 Aug →
inferno6–130.0021%31 Aug →
mirage13–70.0216%30 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0410%30 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0312%30 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.039%30 Aug →
cache13–110.0322%30 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0614%30 Aug →
ancient13–50.0428%30 Aug →
dust213–50.0418%30 Aug →
ancient13–100.0225%30 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0228%30 Aug →
inferno13–60.0319%15 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0211%14 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.