Ackerman

Ackerman — CS2 Stats

JP76561198012174501[U:1:51908773]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,101Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,488 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,101 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 62 days played since 22 Dec 2023. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,674 +4,054 18 Mar6 May · 6 days played
16,62020,674peak 20,67418 Mar6 May
Faceit ELO: 2,488 +0 30 Aug19 Sept · 3 observations
2,4882,488peak 2,48830 Aug19 Sept
20,674Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,488Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
62Days played since 2023-12-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,488
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 12 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAckermanFACEITLevel 10 · 2,488 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,488csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning63
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51481Last 10051%Win rateWWWLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −7.8pp headshot accuracy · +57ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.0
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.3
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time620ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy25.6%+3.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 25.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–2 · anubis, 25 Jan
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · nuke, 11 Nov
406msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 15 Feb
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 6 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 14mirageWeakest map · 41% over 29
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC29121741%0.00
anubisB24131154%-0.00
nukeB157847%-0.00
dust2A148657%0.02
ancientA149564%0.00
overpass21150%-0.03
inferno1010%-0.04
vertigo110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 29). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,383Matches
58%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
75.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
19Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage43356%1.0915.0
Dust227165%1.0815.4
Anubis21961%1.0114.8
Nuke10965%1.1515.1
Ancient8463%0.9714.3
Overpass1681%1.1813.8
Train1346%0.9214.8
Inferno978%1.0218.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
607msReaction time
36.7%T opening success
60.3%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
5.78HE damage / grenade
13.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.7074% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–00.0217%6 Aug
nuke13–20.0132%13 Jul
dust213–50.1036%6 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0619%26 Apr
mirage13–70.0221%26 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0026%16 Apr
mirage16–140.0614%16 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0019%12 Mar
nuke13–40.0727%12 Mar
nuke15–19-0.0220%19 Feb
dust25–13-0.0925%19 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0015%10 Feb
dust28–13-0.0133%8 Feb
mirage11–130.0914%12 Jan
dust213–80.0432%10 Jan
ancient13–9-0.019%17 Nov
ancient10–130.0544%15 Nov
mirage13–90.0021%11 Nov
nuke0–3-0.06100%11 Nov
mirage13–16-0.0316%19 Oct
dust29–140.0233%12 Sept
nuke13–40.0925%12 Sept
overpass3–13-0.0935%12 Sept
dust213–30.1517%11 Sept
nuke13–60.0427%11 Sept
dust213–10-0.0410%27 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0832%1 Jul
mirage2–13-0.1023%1 Jul
anubis13–90.0332%30 Jun
dust213–60.0413%30 Jun
dust213–100.0429%30 Jun
dust213–70.0114%28 Jun
mirage13–40.0617%6 May
mirage5–13-0.0426%6 May
mirage13–20.0737%29 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0012%27 Apr
ancient13–70.1024%19 Apr
anubis4–130.0215%15 Feb
dust214–16-0.0120%8 Feb
mirage7–130.1332%5 Feb
inferno7–11-0.0415%25 Jan
anubis13–20.2137%25 Jan
vertigo13–100.0527%16 Dec
dust212–120.1221%8 Dec
ancient13–100.0921%30 Oct
mirage13–40.1418%30 Oct
anubis13–10-0.0112%29 Oct
dust213–7-0.0616%29 Oct
mirage13–160.0326%4 May
dust210–13-0.0328%4 May
ancient13–10-0.0214%18 Apr
ancient13–10.000%16 Apr
ancient13–10.000%16 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0727%8 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0925%7 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0819%6 Apr
anubis13–60.0248%6 Apr
nuke16–13-0.0115%6 Apr
nuke2–13-0.0324%3 Apr
anubis14–15-0.0219%2 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0326%2 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0412%1 Apr
overpass13–100.0219%18 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0215%9 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0411%18 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0417%18 Feb
mirage10–13-0.1019%18 Feb
anubis13–11-0.039%16 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0122%15 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0414%14 Feb
anubis16–130.0315%14 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0218%14 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0315%13 Feb
anubis13–30.0130%13 Feb
ancient10–13-0.1019%11 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0124%11 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0813%7 Feb
ancient13–110.0327%6 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0015%6 Feb
nuke13–50.0334%10 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0530%7 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0120%6 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0225%6 Jan
mirage2–13-0.0938%6 Jan
anubis13–100.0026%1 Jan
mirage13–70.0126%1 Jan
mirage13–40.0721%31 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0315%31 Dec
mirage6–13-0.0545%26 Dec
mirage13–50.0334%24 Dec
anubis13–90.0211%23 Dec
nuke13–50.0420%23 Dec
anubis13–50.0717%23 Dec
mirage12–160.0418%23 Dec
anubis10–13-0.0811%23 Dec
nuke5–130.0018%23 Dec
ancient4–13-0.0219%23 Dec
anubis11–130.0124%23 Dec
mirage13–70.0126%22 Dec
anubis8–13-0.0925%22 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →