Quentings

Quentings — CS2 Stats

76561198012153738[U:1:51888010]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

670Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,772Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,688Blue band · top ~40.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−338Premier CS Rating · 13,026 → 12,688
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 20 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,688 +593 20 Apr20 Sept · 36 days played
4,98213,344peak 13,34420 Apr20 Sept
13,351Peak Premier in tracked matches
45Days played since 2026-04-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 656 below peak (13,344)
  • +3,268 over 30 days · improving
  • +7,706 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 2,312 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate35.7%42.7%43.8%8.1% short
Shot accuracy18.9%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.000.991.02meets
Match win rate46.9%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGQuentingsFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,688 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning45
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44542Last 10044%Win rateLWLWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.3pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 747ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 676ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility3.1
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch0.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 646ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning4.5
Utility3.1
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time651ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 674ms → last ⅓ avg 651ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 26 Apr
29%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 23 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 9–1 · inferno, 26 Aug
12–1Biggest win · inferno, 10 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 17anubisWeakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS1711665%-0.01
anubisD1751229%0.00
dust2C156940%-0.01
ancientC145936%-0.01
cacheC125742%-0.04
nukeB126650%-0.01
mirageB126650%0.00
overpass1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,786Lifetime kills
1.00K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
2,767Matches
46.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
35.7%Headshot %
18.9%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 4 players
5,446MVPs
1,070Hours (in match)
3,105Bombs planted
460Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

12,135inferno
4,111dust2
1,125nuke
978train
582cbble
368vertigo
184italy
172office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

62Matches
55%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
67.0ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

21%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1650%0.9513.3
Ancient1567%0.8913.6
Anubis850%0.9111.1
Dust2850%0.8316.0
Mirage333%0.6911.0
Overpass3100%0.9515.3
Cache3100%0.7515.7
Train20%0.5811.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
41.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
70.7%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
646msReaction time
31.4%T opening success
32.2%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
7.40HE damage / grenade
2.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4348 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.4186% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–130.0411%20 Sept
cache13–100.0111%19 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0715%17 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0123%16 Sept
ancient13–110.0312%15 Sept
ancient11–130.0511%14 Sept
dust25–130.0120%13 Sept
nuke16–13-0.0013%13 Sept
mirage6–0-0.0113%13 Sept
dust213–8-0.0621%12 Sept
inferno12–1-0.0023%10 Sept
anubis13–110.0115%10 Sept
ancient13–80.0310%10 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0312%9 Sept
nuke13–70.0223%9 Sept
nuke13–100.0719%8 Sept
cache5–13-0.1014%3 Sept
dust25–13-0.0519%3 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0317%31 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0120%31 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0215%31 Aug
inferno13–60.0221%31 Aug
inferno13–100.0522%29 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0710%29 Aug
dust213–40.0610%28 Aug
mirage13–60.0623%28 Aug
dust22–13-0.0616%26 Aug
inferno9–1-0.0217%26 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0411%26 Aug
cache13–6-0.0413%25 Aug
mirage8–130.1014%25 Aug
inferno13–110.0111%24 Aug
inferno9–12-0.0213%23 Aug
dust213–60.0829%23 Aug
dust24–130.0111%23 Aug
dust213–9-0.0318%20 Aug
nuke13–70.0414%20 Aug
anubis11–130.0114%18 Aug
cache13–3-0.007%3 Aug
inferno3–130.0113%31 Jul
dust28–13-0.0714%31 Jul
ancient6–130.0420%31 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0217%30 Jul
anubis13–100.008%30 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0710%29 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0416%26 Jul
mirage13–110.0525%24 Jul
cache16–14-0.0112%24 Jul
dust213–7-0.0616%22 Jul
mirage11–130.0716%22 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0122%19 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0120%19 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0423%19 Jul
cache8–13-0.0214%19 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0122%19 Jul
inferno13–110.0120%19 Jul
inferno13–80.0015%19 Jul
overpass2–8-0.1014%22 Jun
dust29–13-0.0320%22 Jun
anubis11–13-0.014%19 Jun
mirage13–3-0.095%19 Jun
dust28–130.0119%19 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0417%19 Jun
mirage6–130.0414%19 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0317%18 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0416%18 Jun
dust27–13-0.028%18 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0614%14 Jun
ancient13–90.0211%13 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0314%13 Jun
dust213–110.0118%13 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0117%3 Jun
cache12–12-0.0818%31 May
cache13–3-0.014%31 May
cache8–13-0.0515%31 May
anubis13–10-0.0013%30 May
anubis14–160.0114%30 May
ancient7–13-0.0213%30 May
anubis13–100.0319%29 May
nuke14–160.0115%29 May
ancient7–13-0.0517%24 May
anubis3–130.0310%24 May
inferno13–10-0.0211%24 May
dust26–130.0316%13 May
inferno10–13-0.0514%13 May
ancient2–13-0.096%1 May
cache10–13-0.0618%1 May
cache9–13-0.027%1 May
cache4–13-0.0811%1 May
anubis13–30.1220%26 Apr
ancient7–130.016%26 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0618%26 Apr
ancient13–40.0316%25 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0224%25 Apr
anubis8–130.0220%25 Apr
ancient15–15-0.0315%25 Apr
inferno11–13-0.009%21 Apr
inferno7–13-0.060%20 Apr
anubis3–8-0.0122%20 Apr
anubis7–130.0119%20 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →