Gigs_ — CS2 Stats

76561198011828765[U:1:51563037]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

918Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,530Pink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#8862 of 22328 tracked

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66

Positioning51

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–41–4Last 10055%Win rateWWWLWWTWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6

Aggression5.4

Utility5.8

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels1.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6

Positioning5.1

Utility5.8

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time598ms−13ms

first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms

Headshot accuracy14.8%−0.5%

first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–4

13–0Biggest win — inferno

8Longest win streak

W3Current streak

5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 25anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	25	16–9	64%	-0.00
inferno	A	23	13–10	57%	-0.00
ancient	B	17	8–9	47%	-0.01
cache	A	10	6–4	60%	-0.01
overpass	A	10	6–4	60%	-0.01
nuke	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.04
anubis	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.03
dust2	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy

34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.5%Spray accuracy

79.3%Counter-strafing

10.1°Preaim

613msReaction time

26.7%T opening success

47.9%CT opening success

0.73Enemies flashed / flash

11.3%Flash assists

12.29HE damage / grenade

3.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.4933 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.7228% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–10	-0.02	12%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.00	20%	13 Aug →
inferno	9–6	0.03	29%	13 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	11%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	16%	9 Aug →
cache	3–0	-0.00	13%	9 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.04	25%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	15%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	25%	5 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.00	19%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.00	25%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.04	17%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–4	-0.01	12%	30 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	11%	29 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	18%	29 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.06	11%	18 Jul →
anubis	0–13	-0.05	0%	18 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.08	14%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.06	19%	14 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	11%	2 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	10%	2 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	5%	2 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	8%	18 May →
mirage	13–8	0.03	17%	18 May →
cache	10–13	-0.01	15%	1 May →
cache	12–12	-0.00	11%	1 May →
inferno	13–11	0.02	15%	29 Apr →
cache	12–12	-0.05	29%	29 Apr →
cache	13–11	-0.06	9%	29 Apr →
inferno	2–13	-0.00	18%	29 Apr →
cache	13–6	0.04	10%	29 Apr →
ancient	4–13	-0.10	11%	29 Apr →
nuke	13–4	-0.04	11%	29 Apr →
cache	13–7	0.06	20%	29 Apr →
cache	13–7	-0.02	26%	29 Apr →
inferno	13–9	0.02	14%	12 Apr →
ancient	13–6	0.08	15%	10 Apr →
nuke	13–8	0.01	11%	10 Apr →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	18%	9 Apr →
inferno	13–5	0.01	18%	9 Apr →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	15%	7 Apr →
overpass	1–13	-0.06	21%	7 Apr →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	15%	1 Apr →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	13%	31 Mar →
inferno	16–13	0.03	17%	17 Mar →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	10%	17 Mar →
anubis	4–13	-0.06	3%	17 Mar →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	11%	4 Mar →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	21%	4 Mar →
nuke	2–13	-0.09	16%	4 Feb →
ancient	5–13	-0.02	16%	4 Feb →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	21%	27 Jan →
mirage	13–3	0.07	25%	26 Jan →
mirage	13–8	0.00	10%	26 Jan →
ancient	13–11	0.02	11%	26 Jan →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	9%	26 Jan →
overpass	11–13	0.04	15%	26 Jan →
overpass	10–6	0.03	5%	26 Jan →
inferno	13–4	-0.06	10%	26 Jan →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	17%	26 Jan →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	21%	26 Jan →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	7%	25 Jan →
overpass	13–5	-0.04	13%	24 Jan →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	17%	24 Jan →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	15%	24 Jan →
ancient	13–7	0.12	9%	24 Jan →
overpass	5–13	-0.05	11%	24 Jan →
mirage	13–10	-0.06	13%	24 Jan →
inferno	16–13	-0.04	5%	24 Jan →
mirage	13–2	0.08	18%	24 Jan →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	10%	24 Jan →
mirage	14–16	-0.03	8%	24 Jan →
overpass	13–9	0.03	17%	24 Jan →
mirage	14–16	0.03	12%	22 Jan →
inferno	13–7	0.04	16%	19 Jan →
overpass	8–13	-0.01	9%	18 Jan →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	17%	15 Jan →
inferno	3–13	-0.09	25%	14 Jan →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	38%	14 Jan →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	15%	30 Dec →
overpass	13–8	0.02	19%	30 Dec →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	11%	29 Dec →
overpass	13–8	-0.03	20%	29 Dec →
inferno	13–0	0.05	15%	29 Dec →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	14%	29 Dec →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	29%	23 Dec →
ancient	13–8	-0.04	18%	23 Dec →
mirage	13–10	0.02	22%	17 Dec →
ancient	13–4	0.01	13%	17 Dec →
inferno	13–4	0.12	17%	17 Dec →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	10%	30 Nov →
overpass	5–0	0.03	9%	30 Nov →
mirage	13–1	0.06	20%	30 Nov →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	12%	28 Nov →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	7%	28 Nov →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	10%	28 Nov →
inferno	2–13	-0.05	14%	27 Nov →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	13%	27 Nov →
mirage	13–6	0.02	16%	26 Nov →
ancient	10–13	0.01	10%	13 Nov →