d0n_spurgt

d0n_spurgt — CS2 Stats

DK76561198011254066[U:1:50988338]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,031Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,612 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,612 → 2,612
+6Tracked matches · now 3,031
0.0ppWin rate · 41.4% → 41.4%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 54 days played since 9 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,612 +0 13 Sept21 Sept · 2 observations
2,6122,612peak 2,61213 Sept21 Sept
2,612Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2026-02-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,612
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 388 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGd0n_spurgtFACEITLevel 10 · 2,612 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,612csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning55
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48493Last 10048%Win rateWLLWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.6pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility7.4
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.5
Utility7.4
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time560ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%+5.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 13–8 · ancient, 20 Jun
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–3 · inferno, 3 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 25 Aug
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 1 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB21101148%0.02
infernoA2112957%0.01
nukeB189950%0.04
cacheD92722%0.01
overpassS65183%0.06
mirageD51420%0.02
anubisC52340%0.03
vertigo41325%-0.03
dust23030%-0.03
poseidon32167%0.05
train32167%0.06
debris220100%0.19

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,941Matches
52%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
86.5ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke18262%1.4317.5
Ancient16050%1.2317.2
Anubis12946%1.3417.3
Inferno9946%1.1516.4
Overpass6849%1.3217.3
Vertigo6659%1.3017.8
Train1856%1.2715.0
Mirage1553%1.1916.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.5%Spray accuracy
88.2%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
556msReaction time
37.8%T opening success
41.1%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
7.30HE damage / grenade
19.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.8227% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–100.0511%18 Sept
vertigo5–13-0.0126%18 Sept
dust24–13-0.1014%18 Sept
ancient13–90.0010%9 Sept
ancient13–110.0110%2 Sept
inferno11–130.0117%25 Aug
inferno13–100.0329%19 Aug
cache2–13-0.0423%18 Aug
nuke13–20.0914%17 Aug
cache13–60.0120%14 Aug
dust28–130.0523%14 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0513%14 Aug
cache7–13-0.0314%14 Aug
nuke13–80.0319%14 Aug
inferno19–170.0918%12 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0326%12 Aug
ancient13–110.027%7 Aug
poseidon4–9-0.0816%6 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0129%5 Aug
mirage10–130.0825%4 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0313%4 Aug
debris9–50.1415%3 Aug
inferno9–30.0850%3 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0025%1 Aug
cache15–150.1327%27 Jul
nuke6–130.0322%27 Jul
inferno8–8-0.0813%27 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0122%21 Jul
nuke3–130.1415%21 Jul
nuke11–130.0217%20 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0326%20 Jul
inferno7–130.0029%20 Jul
ancient13–80.0123%17 Jul
nuke13–80.0721%17 Jul
train12–70.0525%17 Jul
poseidon9–50.1028%16 Jul
debris9–10.2433%16 Jul
cache10–130.0519%13 Jul
poseidon9–40.1326%12 Jul
vertigo9–6-0.0016%12 Jul
cache10–130.0015%8 Jul
anubis9–130.0120%1 Jul
inferno13–100.0321%1 Jul
overpass16–130.0313%1 Jul
ancient13–10.1325%1 Jul
overpass13–110.0213%29 Jun
nuke13–90.0723%25 Jun
ancient13–90.036%25 Jun
inferno11–130.0516%24 Jun
anubis10–130.1014%24 Jun
ancient13–80.2622%20 Jun
nuke13–160.1019%20 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0210%20 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0523%16 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0317%8 Jun
ancient16–140.0819%8 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0118%5 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0021%2 Jun
ancient7–13-0.058%1 Jun
anubis13–40.0927%30 May
nuke13–90.0316%30 May
inferno13–8-0.0110%26 May
nuke10–130.0836%22 May
train3–130.0733%22 May
vertigo3–13-0.0323%22 May
inferno13–7-0.0212%22 May
cache11–13-0.0125%21 May
nuke16–14-0.0120%20 May
nuke9–130.069%20 May
nuke13–20.0421%18 May
inferno13–110.0013%14 May
ancient13–80.0617%14 May
ancient10–130.0416%11 May
ancient14–160.0210%8 May
inferno13–11-0.0117%8 May
inferno11–130.0215%8 May
cache13–10-0.007%1 May
cache9–13-0.0210%29 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0420%27 Apr
overpass13–100.0915%17 Apr
vertigo7–13-0.0714%17 Apr
dust26–13-0.0511%17 Apr
ancient6–130.029%17 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0119%15 Apr
train13–20.0818%15 Apr
overpass13–40.1018%15 Apr
inferno13–9-0.028%15 Apr
inferno13–80.0610%10 Apr
mirage7–130.0431%10 Apr
overpass13–10.148%9 Apr
ancient4–13-0.017%9 Apr
ancient3–13-0.1222%6 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0112%6 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0117%6 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0314%6 Apr
inferno6–130.0120%23 Feb
nuke13–100.035%19 Feb
nuke17–190.0114%19 Feb
inferno19–16-0.0412%10 Feb
nuke19–160.0117%9 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →