nIcy

nIcy — CS2 Stats

CH76561198011113956[U:1:50848228]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,667Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,306Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,614 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,614 → 1,614
+2Tracked matches · now 2,667
0.0ppWin rate · 60.0% → 60.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 26 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,893 +1,435 25 Jan3 Sept · 16 days played
18,27419,999peak 19,99925 Jan3 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,614 +0 3 Sept18 Sept · 3 observations
1,6141,614peak 1,6143 Sept18 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,614Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2025-11-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,614
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 137 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches4
Win rate25%
K/D0.51
Headshot %57%

Measured 16 Sep 202621 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate43.1%46.8%48.3%5.1% short
Shot accuracy16.4%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.831.061.070.24 short
Match win rate44.8%46.3%46.9%2.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnIcyFACEITLevel 8 · 1,614 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,614csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning41
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53452Last 10053%Win rateLWWLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +6.5pp headshot accuracy · +36ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim4.9
Utility5.4
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning4.1
Utility5.4
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact8.3

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time571ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–5 · anubis, 4 Apr
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–3 · inferno, 19 Jan
438msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · anubis, 2 Aug
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 5 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
914In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 73% over 11ancientWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB28151354%-0.02
mirageC1871139%-0.03
anubisS1712571%-0.01
dust2B158753%-0.05
overpassS118373%-0.00
ancientD61517%-0.04
cache32167%-0.02
nuke2020%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

120,199Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
6,545Matches
44.8%Match win rate
43.1%Headshot %
16.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
15,322MVPs
3,548Hours (in match)
7,104Bombs planted
1,923Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4735,889
AWP10,585
P2504,924
Knife3,632
FAMAS2,649
MP91,997

Lifetime map wins

23,756dust2
22,047inferno
4,814train
3,706nuke
2,636vertigo
1,689cbble
264office
173dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,466Matches
50%Win rate
0.80Avg K/D
67.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno13252%0.7912.8
Anubis11250%0.7613.1
Mirage8944%0.7011.6
Overpass5549%0.9113.7
Ancient5332%0.6411.3
Dust25355%0.6611.2
Nuke3546%0.7711.0
Cache1346%0.6511.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
70.5%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
569msReaction time
18.3%T opening success
39.7%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
8.67HE damage / grenade
7.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.2899% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache1–13-0.0824%17 Sept
dust213–9-0.0130%15 Sept
anubis13–11-0.039%12 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0115%12 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0548%10 Sept
cache13–6-0.0327%28 Aug
inferno13–3-0.059%14 Aug
anubis13–90.0012%14 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0112%6 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0425%6 Aug
dust213–2-0.047%6 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0112%5 Aug
dust213–1-0.0228%5 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0213%2 Aug
mirage8–13-0.079%30 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0118%30 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0620%29 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0415%14 Jun
ancient4–13-0.074%29 May
mirage13–90.0121%28 May
overpass13–5-0.0110%25 May
ancient5–13-0.0521%25 May
anubis13–11-0.0219%2 May
inferno13–90.0210%2 May
cache13–100.0514%1 May
overpass13–11-0.0216%5 Apr
overpass5–13-0.0621%5 Apr
inferno16–13-0.0611%5 Apr
overpass16–13-0.049%5 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0519%4 Apr
anubis13–50.1621%4 Apr
anubis13–70.0019%4 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0514%3 Apr
dust211–13-0.0419%3 Apr
anubis15–15-0.0621%3 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0112%9 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0119%9 Mar
dust214–16-0.0710%26 Feb
dust26–13-0.133%26 Feb
dust213–11-0.0519%22 Feb
inferno13–4-0.0416%22 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0121%22 Feb
inferno13–6-0.028%22 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0311%22 Feb
anubis13–100.0417%22 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0511%21 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0129%21 Feb
dust213–8-0.0521%21 Feb
mirage0–2-0.120%21 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0722%21 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0413%20 Feb
overpass13–50.0223%20 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0326%20 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0326%16 Feb
inferno3–13-0.0619%16 Feb
inferno13–9-0.0320%16 Feb
overpass4–13-0.0622%16 Feb
anubis14–16-0.0418%14 Feb
dust26–13-0.078%14 Feb
overpass13–80.0715%14 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0218%13 Feb
inferno13–60.0512%13 Feb
dust213–10-0.0113%13 Feb
inferno9–130.0119%13 Feb
mirage15–15-0.048%11 Feb
dust213–7-0.0315%11 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0718%11 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0421%31 Jan
inferno13–80.0314%31 Jan
dust24–13-0.0311%31 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0410%31 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0113%31 Jan
ancient2–13-0.0817%25 Jan
inferno13–90.0120%25 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0435%25 Jan
inferno13–90.0118%25 Jan
overpass13–60.0515%24 Jan
anubis13–10-0.0419%24 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0114%24 Jan
inferno13–7-0.0316%24 Jan
anubis4–13-0.068%24 Jan
ancient10–130.0119%24 Jan
anubis13–50.0027%24 Jan
overpass13–60.0625%24 Jan
mirage13–70.0020%24 Jan
anubis13–4-0.0314%23 Jan
dust28–13-0.099%23 Jan
inferno11–130.0019%23 Jan
inferno14–160.0111%23 Jan
ancient13–16-0.0217%23 Jan
inferno3–13-0.0713%19 Jan
inferno3–3-0.0150%19 Jan
dust214–16-0.0320%19 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0713%19 Jan
overpass14–16-0.0214%15 Dec
inferno8–13-0.0421%13 Dec
dust213–7-0.0530%5 Dec
overpass13–110.0119%2 Dec
inferno13–50.0712%2 Dec
ancient19–17-0.0116%26 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →