reflexive 🎥 — CS2 Stats

GB76561198008554978[U:1:48289250]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,718Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport

Premier CS Rating28,073Top 5% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2297 of 239032 tracked

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 28,073 → 28,073

0Faceit ELO · 2,127 → 2,127

+11Tracked matches · now 2,718

−5.7ppWin rate · 59.3% → 53.6%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 25 days played since 2 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,073 +2,388 28 Jul – 10 Sept · 9 days played

Faceit ELO: 2,127 +0 3 Sept – 10 Sept · 3 observations

28,184Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,127Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

25Days played since 2026-07-02

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,127
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 373 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 28,073
+891 over 30 days · improving
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,927 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-09-03
Pink band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78

Positioning43

Utility80

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61–30–9Last 10061%Win rateLWTLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–2–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.06
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 560ms

Last 10

6–3–1 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 594ms

Last 20

11–7–2 · 55% win rate
Avg rating 0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.8 against its own average).

Aim7.8

Utility8.0

Positioning4.3

Opening Duels1.1

Clutch3.6

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 80 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8

Positioning4.3

Utility8.0

Mechanics5.1

Opening Duels0.8

Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time570ms−56ms

first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms

Headshot accuracy17.7%+0.6%

first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.32Best match rating · 9–1 · poseidon, 21 Jul →

33%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · inferno, 22 Jul →

344msFastest reaction time · 0–3 · dust2, 2 Jul →

13–0Biggest win · inferno, 30 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

5–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

poseidonBest map · 83% over 18debrisWeakest map · 38% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	20	10–10	50%	0.04
poseidon	S	18	15–3	83%	0.11
cache	A	16	10–6	63%	0.03
inferno	S	12	10–2	83%	0.03
mirage	C	10	4–6	40%	0.00
debris	C	8	3–5	38%	0.02
anubis	S	6	4–2	67%	0.01
ancient	—	4	3–1	75%	0.01
nuke	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.01
eldorado	—	2	1–1	50%	0.14
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,631Matches

54%Win rate

1.17Avg K/D

77.8ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	57	56%	1.17	15.5
Mirage	49	45%	1.16	15.8
Inferno	24	50%	0.99	14.6
Ancient	17	65%	1.08	15.7
Anubis	15	67%	1.20	16.4
Overpass	7	71%	1.25	16.3
Cache	6	100%	1.48	17.7
Nuke	5	80%	1.48	18.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy

37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.0%Spray accuracy

73.1%Counter-strafing

9.5°Preaim

553msReaction time

27.6%T opening success

36.4%CT opening success

0.75Enemies flashed / flash

9.5%Flash assists

8.31HE damage / grenade

23.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.6306% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	8–13	-0.06	27%	19 Sept →
poseidon	9–5	0.20	17%	11 Sept →
debris	8–8	0.01	21%	11 Sept →
mirage	2–13	0.03	18%	10 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.10	24%	10 Sept →
dust2	13–4	0.18	19%	10 Sept →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	20%	10 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.04	14%	10 Sept →
anubis	13–10	-0.08	5%	10 Sept →
dust2	13–3	0.05	10%	10 Sept →
inferno	13–2	0.17	14%	10 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	25%	9 Sept →
cache	13–7	0.03	23%	8 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.05	25%	27 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.11	12%	27 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	19%	27 Aug →
train	13–2	0.05	20%	24 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	23%	24 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.02	17%	24 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.03	15%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.05	19%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.09	20%	20 Aug →
debris	9–6	-0.03	7%	17 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.00	13%	17 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.05	17%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.08	13%	17 Aug →
poseidon	9–6	0.03	31%	17 Aug →
poseidon	9–4	-0.02	19%	17 Aug →
poseidon	9–7	0.04	14%	17 Aug →
debris	5–9	-0.15	18%	17 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.02	15%	17 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.00	9%	14 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	23%	14 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.07	32%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.06	24%	31 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	29%	31 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.02	26%	31 Jul →
poseidon	9–2	0.31	32%	31 Jul →
poseidon	9–5	0.11	14%	31 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.10	17%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–4	-0.03	25%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.04	7%	30 Jul →
vertigo	6–13	-0.03	20%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–0	0.02	15%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.03	21%	29 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.12	19%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.05	20%	29 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.01	17%	28 Jul →
nuke	0–13	-0.04	31%	27 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.09	10%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.03	17%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.06	16%	22 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.02	14%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.04	13%	22 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	33%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.16	23%	21 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.05	15%	21 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.14	20%	21 Jul →
poseidon	4–9	-0.10	16%	21 Jul →
poseidon	9–5	0.03	28%	21 Jul →
poseidon	9–1	0.32	17%	21 Jul →
poseidon	9–1	0.18	33%	21 Jul →
debris	8–8	0.11	7%	21 Jul →
poseidon	9–4	0.22	24%	21 Jul →
poseidon	9–0	0.26	25%	21 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	12%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.06	16%	12 Jul →
anubis	16–13	0.04	21%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.08	24%	12 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.06	24%	12 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.04	15%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.04	9%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	17%	12 Jul →
debris	9–7	0.12	15%	12 Jul →
poseidon	8–8	0.03	21%	10 Jul →
eldorado	8–8	0.03	15%	10 Jul →
poseidon	9–3	0.13	10%	9 Jul →
debris	8–8	0.04	23%	9 Jul →
poseidon	8–8	-0.04	4%	9 Jul →
debris	9–4	0.05	10%	9 Jul →
eldorado	9–5	0.25	27%	9 Jul →
debris	3–9	-0.02	13%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.09	13%	9 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.08	13%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.02	24%	9 Jul →
mirage	2–5	-0.04	17%	9 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	12%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	16%	3 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.01	24%	3 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	25%	3 Jul →
poseidon	9–4	-0.00	28%	3 Jul →
poseidon	9–2	0.04	31%	2 Jul →
poseidon	9–4	0.22	20%	2 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	19%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.06	24%	2 Jul →
dust2	0–3	-0.14	0%	2 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.02	9%	2 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.05	20%	2 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.04	9%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.07	12%	2 Jul →