requal

requal — CS2 Stats

76561198006126381[U:1:45860653]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,600Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,809Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#72436 of 260015 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,492 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,809 +2,244 6 Sept – 29 Oct · 23 days played
16,90521,165peak 21,1656 Sept29 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,492 +0 29 Aug – 31 Aug · 2 observations
1,4921,492peak 1,49229 Aug31 Aug
21,503Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,492Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-08-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,492
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 39 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 356 below peak (21,165)
  • +3,565 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,191 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrequalFACEITLevel 6 · 1,492 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,809 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,492csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning57
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–47–5Last 10048%Win rateLWLTLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · +15ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 694ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 676ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 668ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim5.1
Utility7.3
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 658ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning5.7
Utility7.3
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time675ms+21ms
first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 675ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%+4.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 9–4 · nuke, 1 Oct →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · dust2, 5 Oct →
453msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 23 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 5 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2112–957%-0.01
dust2B2010–1050%-0.01
infernoB1910–953%-0.01
nukeC94–544%0.00
mirageS96–367%0.03
anubisD82–625%0.01
ancientD62–433%-0.01
office—42–250%0.02
vertigo—40–40%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

945Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
80.9ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20156%1.0316.0
Inferno16753%1.0315.1
Dust214447%1.0716.4
Anubis10043%1.0316.2
Nuke7156%1.0916.0
Ancient4838%0.9815.2
Cache4450%1.2316.0
Train1275%1.0614.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.6%Spray accuracy
75.7%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
658msReaction time
52.8%T opening success
39.8%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
12.83HE damage / grenade
15.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.7837% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0619%31 Oct →
office13–110.0114%30 Oct →
cache1–9-0.0233%30 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0524%29 Oct →
cache12–16-0.0021%29 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0122%27 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0530%26 Oct →
ancient13–50.0425%26 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0432%12 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0620%10 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0126%10 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.0919%10 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.069%10 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0427%8 Oct →
inferno13–60.0714%8 Oct →
dust213–90.0325%8 Oct →
mirage13–110.0412%7 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0221%7 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0427%6 Oct →
cache13–80.0431%6 Oct →
inferno13–90.0423%6 Oct →
dust210–0-0.030%6 Oct →
cache13–100.0521%6 Oct →
inferno13–50.0413%6 Oct →
dust213–2-0.0519%6 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0316%5 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0310%5 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0222%5 Oct →
mirage13–100.1019%5 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0213%5 Oct →
cache13–50.0227%5 Oct →
dust213–10.0642%5 Oct →
dust215–150.009%4 Oct →
ancient13–100.0521%4 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0610%4 Oct →
dust216–130.0335%2 Oct →
cache13–60.0029%2 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0217%2 Oct →
cache13–80.0021%2 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0613%2 Oct →
vertigo4–9-0.1238%1 Oct →
nuke9–40.1119%1 Oct →
inferno9–50.0118%1 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0222%30 Sept →
mirage13–110.0214%30 Sept →
mirage13–110.0520%30 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0818%30 Sept →
ancient11–130.0412%27 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.010%27 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0420%26 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0110%24 Sept →
anubis15–150.1017%24 Sept →
mirage12–120.0323%21 Sept →
nuke13–110.0626%21 Sept →
vertigo6–130.0312%20 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0914%20 Sept →
cache10–130.0113%20 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0413%19 Sept →
dust22–13-0.1010%17 Sept →
vertigo7–130.0412%16 Sept →
cache13–30.078%16 Sept →
inferno11–130.0818%16 Sept →
anubis13–80.0414%16 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0415%14 Sept →
nuke7–130.0118%14 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0719%13 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0712%13 Sept →
mirage13–50.0321%13 Sept →
mirage13–100.0230%13 Sept →
nuke13–50.0124%11 Sept →
anubis9–130.0819%9 Sept →
inferno11–130.019%9 Sept →
dust213–100.0622%8 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0426%8 Sept →
mirage11–130.0315%8 Sept →
office1–13-0.0330%8 Sept →
office12–120.0819%8 Sept →
cache9–13-0.067%6 Sept →
inferno13–90.019%6 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0020%2 Sept →
office13–30.035%2 Sept →
cache5–13-0.108%30 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0116%29 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0117%29 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0321%28 Aug →
dust211–130.0711%25 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0116%25 Aug →
dust22–130.014%25 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0214%23 Aug →
vertigo3–13-0.0710%23 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0714%20 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0017%20 Aug →
inferno14–16-0.049%18 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0421%18 Aug →
anubis13–60.0414%18 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0320%17 Aug →
nuke13–50.0426%17 Aug →
dust213–60.0022%17 Aug →
inferno19–17-0.0312%16 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0116%13 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.