Melo

Melo — CS2 Stats

HK76561198005169226[U:1:44903498]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

505Tracked matches70%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,855Hours in CS80Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,988Top 25% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#42187 of 252620 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−45Premier CS Rating · 23,033 → 22,988

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,988 +1,078 2 Sept – 17 Oct · 16 days played
20,00023,236peak 23,2362 Sept17 Oct
23,751Peak Premier in tracked matches
22Days played since 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 248 below peak (23,236)
  • +2,295 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,012 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,126), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate53.7%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy13.2%13.0%13.2%meets
Kill/death ratio1.081.061.07meets
Match win rate45.6%46.3%46.9%1.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMeloFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,988 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning44
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT61–35–4Last 10061%Win rateLLWWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −3.5pp headshot accuracy · −39ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility6.1
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.4
Utility6.1
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time519ms−0ms
first ⅓ avg 519ms → last ⅓ avg 519ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 9 Oct →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · nuke, 15 Oct →
383msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 15 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 4 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 10anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S3022–873%0.02
nukeB189–950%-0.00
mirageS128–467%0.00
anubisD124–833%-0.02
infernoS108–280%0.01
ancientA106–460%0.03
cacheB84–450%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

102,423Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
3,919Matches
45.6%Match win rate
53.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
13.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
13,917MVPs
2,097Hours (in match)
3,769Bombs planted
2,192Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4741,567
AWP9,828
SSG 083,111
P2502,160
Knife996

Lifetime map wins

26,590dust2
2,793inferno
1,259nuke
414cbble
393train
110vertigo
84office
15italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

184Matches
54%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
75.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24856%1.3716.1
Inferno1953%0.9615.2
Ancient1856%1.0515.9
Mirage1839%1.0814.9
Nuke1377%1.5215.4
Anubis1040%0.8812.9
Cache2100%1.2012.5
Overpass1100%4.7519.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
519msReaction time
39.5%T opening success
38.1%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
13.05HE damage / grenade
8.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.5182% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.1311%17 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0312%17 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0112%17 Oct →
inferno16–13-0.0521%17 Oct →
inferno13–100.0520%15 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.058%15 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0612%15 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0214%15 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0415%15 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0622%15 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0419%15 Oct →
nuke13–10.0126%15 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0018%15 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0321%15 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0114%15 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0711%15 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0319%15 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0714%15 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0324%15 Oct →
cache13–30.1618%15 Oct →
nuke13–40.0238%15 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0311%14 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0716%14 Oct →
mirage13–30.0224%14 Oct →
anubis13–40.0517%14 Oct →
nuke8–2-0.0933%14 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0425%14 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0520%14 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0220%14 Oct →
ancient13–110.0721%14 Oct →
dust213–70.1217%14 Oct →
ancient10–130.1121%14 Oct →
dust214–160.1423%14 Oct →
nuke13–40.1019%14 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0019%14 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0614%14 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0110%14 Oct →
cache8–130.0118%14 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0723%12 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0621%12 Oct →
mirage16–130.0723%12 Oct →
inferno13–40.0128%11 Oct →
cache13–8-0.034%11 Oct →
ancient13–80.0418%10 Oct →
inferno13–10.0816%9 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0017%9 Oct →
ancient13–10.1810%9 Oct →
dust216–120.0314%9 Oct →
dust213–1-0.004%6 Oct →
dust213–110.0228%6 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0326%5 Oct →
nuke16–140.0410%4 Oct →
cache13–90.0916%4 Oct →
mirage13–10.0731%4 Oct →
dust213–10.0827%4 Oct →
mirage13–00.0717%4 Oct →
nuke14–160.0718%4 Oct →
dust215–150.0813%4 Oct →
nuke13–60.1028%4 Oct →
mirage4–130.1023%4 Oct →
nuke13–90.0116%4 Oct →
dust213–7-0.079%3 Oct →
dust213–50.0318%3 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0324%2 Oct →
dust213–40.0021%2 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0625%1 Oct →
dust213–40.0917%1 Oct →
dust213–70.0424%1 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.033%29 Sept →
inferno8–130.0011%29 Sept →
dust213–50.0116%28 Sept →
dust213–1-0.0115%27 Sept →
dust212–12-0.079%24 Sept →
inferno13–60.0624%24 Sept →
dust213–100.0016%16 Sept →
anubis10–130.0119%16 Sept →
nuke8–130.0115%16 Sept →
nuke9–130.0019%16 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.1019%16 Sept →
anubis14–160.0620%16 Sept →
inferno13–50.0615%16 Sept →
dust28–130.0322%15 Sept →
anubis13–60.0523%15 Sept →
cache0–13-0.000%15 Sept →
dust21–130.0333%15 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.057%15 Sept →
dust213–100.0616%15 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0522%15 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.056%15 Sept →
dust213–90.0126%15 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0424%15 Sept →
mirage13–60.0621%15 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0117%15 Sept →
cache13–100.0317%5 Sept →
dust213–70.1217%3 Sept →
dust212–120.0216%2 Sept →
dust213–90.0618%2 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0416%2 Sept →
nuke1–6-0.089%2 Sept →
ancient13–60.0424%2 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.