Pzy❃ — CS2 Stats

NO76561198004309440[U:1:44043712]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,363Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,753 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning66

Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–49–10Last 10041%Win rateLWWLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1

Aggression7.9

Utility4.0

Positioning6.6

Opening Duels3.7

Clutch3.4

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning6.6

Utility4.0

Mechanics8.5

Opening Duels3.7

Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time585ms−30ms

first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms

Headshot accuracy26.3%+2.5%

first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 26.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — nuke 12–12

13–0Biggest win — nuke

5Longest win streak

10–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 55% over 11dust2Weakest map · 23% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	B	24	12–12	50%	0.05
mirage	D	18	6–12	33%	0.03
inferno	C	17	7–10	41%	0.01
dust2	D	13	3–10	23%	0.02
ancient	B	12	6–6	50%	0.02
cache	A	11	6–5	55%	0.03
anubis	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.00
warden	—	2	1–1	50%	0.06
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,319Matches

54%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

83.0ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	160	44%	1.08	16.8
Inferno	147	56%	1.18	17.4
Nuke	146	62%	1.21	17.7
Mirage	126	53%	1.10	16.3
Anubis	103	52%	1.05	15.1
Dust2	47	64%	1.12	17.5
Overpass	28	43%	1.28	19.0
Train	19	58%	1.01	14.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.4%Headshot accuracy

34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.2%Spray accuracy

88.4%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

580msReaction time

46.7%T opening success

43.3%CT opening success

0.45Enemies flashed / flash

7.2%Flash assists

4.70HE damage / grenade

4.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4547 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	9–13	0.03	29%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.16	30%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	21%	15 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.00	26%	15 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.03	26%	15 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.01	30%	15 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.04	25%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.08	25%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.02	34%	14 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	28%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.16	31%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.11	17%	7 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	34%	7 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.02	23%	6 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.04	28%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.05	36%	25 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.00	18%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.04	31%	25 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.00	27%	25 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	33%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.15	24%	24 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.06	22%	23 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	19%	20 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.00	18%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.07	27%	8 Jul →
dust2	0–9	-0.07	40%	7 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.03	33%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.03	18%	5 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.03	33%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.03	24%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	31%	9 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.07	16%	9 Jun →
ancient	13–16	-0.03	11%	9 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.11	33%	4 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.01	33%	3 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.09	24%	3 Jun →
nuke	12–12	0.20	38%	27 May →
nuke	5–13	0.01	20%	27 May →
ancient	13–7	0.05	20%	26 May →
ancient	13–8	0.03	22%	26 May →
inferno	16–14	0.01	19%	26 May →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	21%	26 May →
ancient	7–13	0.05	15%	23 May →
inferno	0–6	-0.05	20%	20 May →
cache	12–2	0.07	17%	20 May →
nuke	7–13	0.05	23%	20 May →
mirage	0–11	-0.07	13%	18 May →
cache	4–13	0.05	10%	18 May →
dust2	2–0	0.00	0%	18 May →
inferno	12–12	0.02	31%	18 May →
mirage	9–13	0.00	13%	18 May →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	22%	18 May →
inferno	3–13	-0.05	16%	18 May →
inferno	13–9	0.06	22%	13 May →
cache	5–13	0.07	25%	13 May →
ancient	12–12	0.09	16%	13 May →
inferno	11–13	0.05	22%	13 May →
mirage	13–10	0.19	30%	12 May →
nuke	13–2	0.00	28%	12 May →
cache	13–4	0.04	19%	12 May →
nuke	13–6	0.14	21%	12 May →
inferno	5–1	0.04	38%	12 May →
dust2	4–13	0.01	38%	11 May →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	36%	11 May →
cache	13–7	0.02	17%	4 May →
mirage	5–13	0.04	28%	4 May →
nuke	4–13	0.04	27%	2 May →
cache	13–8	0.05	19%	29 Apr →
cache	12–12	-0.02	13%	29 Apr →
cache	13–3	0.01	36%	29 Apr →
inferno	16–14	0.00	12%	26 Apr →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	24%	25 Apr →
vertigo	12–12	0.05	29%	23 Apr →
nuke	13–8	0.13	34%	23 Apr →
nuke	9–13	0.01	17%	23 Apr →
mirage	12–12	-0.04	33%	21 Apr →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	21%	17 Apr →
nuke	13–0	0.08	38%	17 Apr →
dust2	10–13	0.04	26%	11 Apr →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	26%	11 Apr →
inferno	13–7	0.09	38%	9 Apr →
dust2	7–13	0.04	28%	7 Apr →
nuke	13–10	0.13	19%	6 Apr →
inferno	3–13	0.03	32%	3 Apr →
nuke	4–13	0.00	22%	3 Apr →
nuke	16–13	0.07	21%	25 Mar →
nuke	13–11	0.05	29%	23 Mar →
warden	10–13	0.01	27%	20 Mar →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	16%	20 Mar →
inferno	10–13	0.05	31%	19 Mar →
mirage	0–13	-0.09	0%	18 Mar →
ancient	12–12	-0.01	24%	14 Mar →
mirage	3–13	-0.09	12%	14 Mar →
dust2	1–13	-0.00	20%	14 Mar →
nuke	12–16	0.00	19%	11 Mar →
nuke	10–13	0.04	26%	8 Mar →
warden	13–6	0.10	20%	8 Mar →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	28%	8 Mar →
nuke	15–15	0.04	20%	7 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.13	24%	6 Mar →