nØrd

nØrd — CS2 Stats

DE76561198001201322[U:1:40935594]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,338Tracked matches31%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,033Hours in CS39Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating16,811Purple band · top ~21.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,575 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+370Premier CS Rating · 16,441 → 16,811

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,811 -5,118 1 Aug – 31 Oct · 40 days played
16,24222,649peak 22,6491 Aug31 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,575 +0 30 Aug – 5 Oct · 7 observations
1,5751,575peak 1,57530 Aug5 Oct
22,649Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,575Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-08-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,575
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 176 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,838 below peak (22,649)
  • -5,105 over 30 days · declining
  • -5,118 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,189 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches15360+93
Win rate20%27%−6pp
K/D0.660.85−0.19
Headshot %58%57%+0pp

Measured 5 Oct 2026 → 31 Oct 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 5 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate47.3%48.2%50.9%3.7% short
Shot accuracy10.9%13.2%13.7%2.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.071.09meets
Match win rate42.4%46.9%48.4%6.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnØrdFACEITLevel 9 · 1,575 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER16,811 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,575csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning41
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42–57–1Last 10042%Win rateWLLLLWWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.07 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +100ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 689ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 658ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.8
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.1
Utility6.8
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time596ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–4 · eldorado, 24 Oct →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · inferno, 27 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · anubis, 22 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 21 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 8mirageWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisD155–1033%-0.02
mirageD144–1029%-0.00
infernoD144–1029%-0.01
cacheB147–750%-0.01
dust2C125–742%0.01
ancientC104–640%-0.01
eldoradoA106–460%0.04
nukeS86–275%0.00
train—10–10%-0.05
poseidon—10–10%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

117,802Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
5,537Matches
42.4%Match win rate
47.3%Headshot %
10.9%Shot accuracy
12,374MVPs
2,424Hours (in match)
6,375Bombs planted
1,193Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4736,965
AWP10,287
P2503,333
MP92,729
FAMAS2,186

Lifetime map wins

6,958dust2
5,105inferno
2,570nuke
1,937train
672vertigo
125office
78dust
57italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

351Matches
53%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
78.6ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust26851%1.0715.5
Mirage6746%1.0714.4
Anubis5866%1.2917.6
Ancient5461%1.1216.2
Inferno3549%1.0814.1
Nuke2560%1.2517.1
Train1729%1.1717.2
Vertigo933%1.1714.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
588msReaction time
20.9%T opening success
40.3%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
12.26HE damage / grenade
8.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.8754% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–9-0.0114%31 Oct →
mirage7–130.0413%30 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0421%30 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0643%29 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0814%28 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0914%28 Oct →
cache13–20.0420%28 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.0225%27 Oct →
inferno12–120.0348%27 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0117%27 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0417%27 Oct →
cache4–130.0520%27 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0229%26 Oct →
anubis13–40.0221%25 Oct →
nuke13–100.0021%25 Oct →
inferno9–130.0317%25 Oct →
dust213–80.1424%24 Oct →
eldorado9–40.2926%24 Oct →
cache13–70.0217%24 Oct →
inferno5–130.0021%24 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0016%23 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0123%21 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0218%21 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0410%21 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0031%19 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0825%19 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0526%18 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0713%18 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0013%18 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.1013%18 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.018%17 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0044%17 Oct →
mirage13–60.1311%17 Oct →
dust25–4-0.030%17 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.058%16 Oct →
dust210–130.0414%15 Oct →
ancient7–130.0221%14 Oct →
mirage13–40.0515%14 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0718%13 Oct →
dust27–130.0419%13 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0319%12 Oct →
cache5–130.0122%12 Oct →
nuke13–20.0835%12 Oct →
anubis1–8-0.0320%11 Oct →
cache6–13-0.1013%11 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0919%11 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0317%11 Oct →
cache13–10-0.039%11 Oct →
dust220–220.0123%11 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0221%10 Oct →
cache13–70.0718%10 Oct →
nuke13–110.0434%9 Oct →
mirage13–40.0637%9 Oct →
cache5–130.0120%9 Oct →
ancient13–20.1127%9 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0710%8 Oct →
mirage3–130.0111%8 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.030%7 Oct →
train1–13-0.0525%7 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0533%7 Oct →
eldorado9–60.0813%4 Oct →
cache5–130.0113%4 Oct →
dust213–30.0936%3 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0119%23 Sept →
inferno13–40.0335%23 Sept →
mirage14–160.0213%23 Sept →
eldorado9–4-0.103%23 Sept →
eldorado9–70.1238%23 Sept →
eldorado9–30.0613%22 Sept →
anubis3–130.0128%22 Sept →
inferno13–70.0616%22 Sept →
anubis9–130.017%14 Sept →
eldorado4–9-0.0311%14 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0010%12 Sept →
inferno13–80.0023%9 Sept →
poseidon6–9-0.0128%7 Sept →
eldorado7–90.0443%7 Sept →
nuke4–130.0342%7 Sept →
anubis2–130.0419%7 Sept →
overpass13–110.1118%2 Sept →
eldorado5–9-0.0414%1 Sept →
anubis13–40.0435%1 Sept →
cache5–13-0.1425%22 Aug →
dust213–100.0315%21 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0326%21 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.103%21 Aug →
inferno13–10.0921%21 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0321%21 Aug →
eldorado3–9-0.157%13 Aug →
eldorado9–60.1623%13 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0822%13 Aug →
nuke13–70.0113%6 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0417%6 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0414%6 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0110%1 Aug →
anubis13–4-0.049%1 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0415%1 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0411%1 Aug →
cache13–11-0.049%1 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0210%1 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.