SKHerrm4nn

SKHerrm4nn — CS2 Stats

DE76561198001119980[U:1:40854252]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,270Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,548Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,416Top 25% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#36183 of 239292 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,175 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,270 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 22 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,416 +1,425 23 May19 Sept · 22 days played
20,52324,793peak 24,79323 May19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,175 +0 1 Sept19 Sept · 3 observations
1,1751,175peak 1,1751 Sept19 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,175Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-05-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,175
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 26 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,377 below peak (24,793)
  • -80 over 30 days · steady
  • +2,764 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,584 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,280), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate60.9%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy14.7%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.831.051.060.23 short
Match win rate43.9%45.7%46.3%2.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSKHerrm4nnFACEITLevel 7 · 1,175 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER23,416 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,175csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning48
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47494Last 10047%Win rateLWLLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility6.0
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.8
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time651ms+30ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 651ms
Headshot accuracy22.4%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 24 Jul
40%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · ancient, 27 May
422msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 24 Aug
13–1Biggest win · cache, 31 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 58% over 24infernoWeakest map · 36% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA24141058%-0.01
infernoC2281436%-0.00
cacheC1981142%-0.03
anubisC125742%-0.02
nukeC73443%-0.03
mirageB63350%-0.00
overpassC52340%-0.01
dust2440100%0.01
debris1010%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

110,259Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
4,532Matches
43.9%Match win rate
60.9%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 7 players
14.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
9,322MVPs
6,892Hours (in match)
4,555Bombs planted
1,396Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

14,433inferno
5,626dust2
1,398train
1,382nuke
1,132vertigo
450cbble
35italy
34office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

667Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
65.7ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4149%0.8211.9
Anubis2442%0.8613.3
Inferno1753%0.9914.1
Mirage1533%0.649.4
Overpass1580%1.3115.1
Dust21155%0.9214.2
Cache967%1.0013.0
Nuke850%0.8512.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
84.5%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
636msReaction time
23.4%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
6.39HE damage / grenade
13.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.4205% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–130.0426%9 Sept
cache13–6-0.0220%9 Sept
cache10–13-0.0519%9 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0221%9 Sept
ancient11–130.0026%1 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0213%1 Sept
ancient16–14-0.0315%30 Aug
ancient13–60.0219%30 Aug
mirage16–140.0323%30 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0832%30 Aug
cache13–90.0318%28 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0331%28 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0325%28 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0321%28 Aug
inferno10–6-0.0626%25 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0316%24 Aug
cache7–13-0.0824%24 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0522%24 Aug
dust213–50.0121%24 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0236%24 Aug
mirage4–130.0118%9 Aug
cache15–15-0.0321%9 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0210%9 Aug
mirage13–50.0026%7 Aug
cache5–13-0.0422%7 Aug
cache13–90.0016%7 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0519%6 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0121%6 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0329%6 Aug
cache13–11-0.0129%6 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0324%31 Jul
cache13–10.0223%31 Jul
ancient13–70.0127%31 Jul
cache13–10-0.0315%31 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0319%30 Jul
cache11–13-0.0539%30 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0633%30 Jul
anubis12–3-0.0140%30 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0421%30 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0423%29 Jul
ancient13–50.0524%29 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0326%29 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0629%29 Jul
inferno10–130.0732%28 Jul
dust213–80.0325%28 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0120%26 Jul
cache16–13-0.0533%26 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0225%26 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0625%24 Jul
anubis13–40.1124%24 Jul
cache9–13-0.0423%24 Jul
ancient13–90.0113%24 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0926%24 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0621%23 Jul
cache3–13-0.0412%23 Jul
nuke13–90.0324%23 Jul
ancient16–120.0338%12 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0131%12 Jul
cache10–13-0.0724%11 Jul
inferno13–70.0722%11 Jul
cache14–16-0.0018%10 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0138%10 Jul
ancient13–110.0124%10 Jul
cache13–7-0.0317%10 Jul
inferno13–110.0219%9 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0421%9 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0128%9 Jul
cache6–13-0.0333%9 Jul
debris4–9-0.1120%9 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0418%8 Jul
cache1–13-0.0225%8 Jul
inferno13–70.0034%8 Jul
ancient13–100.0414%5 Jul
inferno11–130.0432%5 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0223%21 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0220%21 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0124%16 Jun
overpass3–13-0.0321%16 Jun
ancient13–10.0219%6 Jun
dust213–10.0122%6 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0212%6 Jun
ancient13–70.0326%6 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0440%6 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0219%29 May
anubis13–9-0.0321%29 May
ancient9–13-0.0521%29 May
ancient0–13-0.0627%29 May
overpass9–130.0121%27 May
ancient11–13-0.0040%27 May
ancient7–13-0.0829%25 May
overpass7–13-0.0313%25 May
inferno8–130.0022%25 May
mirage13–90.0120%23 May
overpass13–60.0113%23 May
dust213–100.0034%22 May
inferno10–130.0438%22 May
nuke9–13-0.0413%22 May
ancient5–13-0.1316%22 May
inferno16–120.0427%22 May
overpass13–100.0114%22 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →