ImDennis

ImDennis — CS2 Stats

DE76561198000637214[U:1:40371486]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

411Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,824Hours in CS87Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,629Purple band · top ~25.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+313Premier CS Rating · 15,316 → 15,629

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,629 +2,016 25 Oct – 2 Nov · 8 days played
13,61316,662peak 16,66225 Oct2 Nov
17,294Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2025-01-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,033 below peak (16,662)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,371 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate33.2%44.8%45.7%12.5% short
Shot accuracy17.3%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.861.031.050.19 short
Match win rate34.7%45.2%45.7%11.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGImDennisFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER15,629 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning36
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–53–4Last 10043%Win rateLWWLWTLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Last 20

  • 7–11–2 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility4.8
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch1.0

Strong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 42% on T to 23% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning3.6
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time638ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 708ms → last ⅓ avg 638ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 16–13 · train, 3 Feb →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · train, 15 Feb →
391msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 31 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 4 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–15In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 12anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D227–1532%-0.04
ancientB126–650%-0.06
mirageS128–467%-0.04
nukeD113–827%-0.06
trainC114–736%-0.02
overpassS96–367%-0.04
anubisD61–517%-0.07
infernoB63–350%-0.04
office—42–250%-0.04
cache—31–233%-0.02
agency—10–10%-0.03
palacio—10–10%-0.02
vertigo—11–0100%-0.01
basalt—11–0100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

66,369Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
3,979Matches
34.7%Match win rate
33.2%Headshot %
17.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
4,883MVPs
1,527Hours (in match)
3,227Bombs planted
542Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

13,692dust2
2,505inferno
1,920nuke
1,100train
907vertigo
693cbble
100office
83dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

216Matches
44%Win rate
0.63Avg K/D
55.6ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2333%0.447.0
Cache20%0.8617.0
Overpass10%0.5511.0
Mirage1100%0.759.0
Anubis10%0.509.0
Ancient10%0.5811.0
Nuke10%0.6111.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
30.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.1%Spray accuracy
84.8%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
642msReaction time
41.9%T opening success
22.8%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
7.92HE damage / grenade
4.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 22.8401% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–13-0.1313%2 Nov →
mirage13–7-0.0529%2 Nov →
dust213–6-0.0423%2 Nov →
nuke11–13-0.0424%2 Nov →
mirage13–8-0.0520%2 Nov →
cache15–15-0.0224%31 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.1123%31 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0622%31 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.1011%31 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0817%31 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.110%31 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0432%31 Oct →
dust213–30.0219%30 Oct →
train12–12-0.0118%29 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0819%29 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0629%29 Oct →
office13–6-0.0418%29 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0129%28 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0216%28 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0523%27 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0614%27 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0626%26 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.1011%25 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0235%24 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0416%24 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0523%24 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0830%24 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0316%24 Oct →
inferno13–110.0139%24 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0519%24 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0622%24 Oct →
dust213–80.0037%7 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0612%4 Oct →
mirage13–1-0.0625%4 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0626%27 Sept →
dust213–16-0.074%25 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0519%25 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0421%2 Feb →
overpass10–13-0.0630%10 Jan →
train9–13-0.0440%27 Dec →
dust211–13-0.0644%27 Dec →
anubis9–13-0.0840%2 Dec →
overpass13–10-0.0537%22 Nov →
dust22–13-0.0526%22 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0341%21 Nov →
train10–13-0.0336%15 Nov →
dust213–8-0.0217%15 Nov →
overpass13–20.0519%15 Nov →
nuke14–16-0.0615%15 Nov →
ancient13–10-0.0316%6 Nov →
overpass13–10-0.0713%24 Oct →
nuke13–1-0.0132%24 Oct →
office11–13-0.0518%18 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0315%18 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0527%17 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.1016%17 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0038%13 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0410%12 Oct →
train11–13-0.0813%12 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0725%12 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.090%12 Oct →
mirage13–60.0125%12 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0317%12 Oct →
agency9–13-0.0330%12 Oct →
overpass11–13-0.0413%11 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0717%11 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0617%11 Oct →
overpass13–11-0.019%10 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.045%10 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0225%10 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0826%10 Oct →
palacio12–12-0.0214%8 Oct →
office13–50.0013%8 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0723%8 Oct →
vertigo13–10-0.0129%6 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0516%6 Oct →
cache14–16-0.0130%14 Mar →
basalt7–3-0.0417%14 Mar →
train10–13-0.0639%2 Mar →
office7–13-0.0715%2 Mar →
dust213–70.0431%2 Mar →
train0–6-0.0110%24 Feb →
dust21–13-0.0922%24 Feb →
overpass13–8-0.0453%23 Feb →
train13–50.0560%15 Feb →
ancient11–13-0.0813%12 Feb →
mirage13–60.0135%12 Feb →
overpass7–13-0.1012%12 Feb →
train7–13-0.0442%12 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0317%12 Feb →
train16–130.0716%3 Feb →
train13–10-0.0720%2 Feb →
ancient3–13-0.0210%1 Feb →
dust212–12-0.0616%31 Jan →
overpass13–9-0.0129%31 Jan →
inferno13–100.0219%31 Jan →
train13–7-0.0111%31 Jan →
mirage13–2-0.0319%31 Jan →
anubis10–13-0.0421%31 Jan →
dust213–16-0.0121%30 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.