TibiC

TibiC — CS2 Stats

RO76561197998974026[U:1:38708298]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

510Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 510 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,881 +8,443 17 Nov – 19 Mar · 6 days played
11,43019,881peak 19,88117 Nov19 Mar
19,881Peak Premier in tracked matches
59Days played since 2023-09-27

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning57
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39–59–2Last 10039%Win rateLWLWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.0
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.7
Utility4.0
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time562ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 18 Dec →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 18 Dec →
406msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · dust2, 31 May →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 31 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
4–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 27% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC259–1636%-0.01
mirageD226–1627%-0.01
ancientD217–1433%-0.00
infernoB136–746%0.00
dust2S118–373%0.02
nuke—42–250%-0.00
cache—20–20%0.01
train—11–0100%0.03
vertigo—10–10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 22). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,032Matches
58%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
86.2ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
26Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust29060%1.3217.4
Ancient7442%1.0016.5
Anubis7443%1.1115.2
Mirage6344%1.0216.9
Inferno3543%1.1317.2
Cache850%1.0817.5
Nuke667%1.0619.0
Overpass450%1.5318.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.3%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
562msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
9.94HE damage / grenade
3.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.4298 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.796% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–13-0.0216%25 Aug →
anubis13–20.0529%16 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0518%14 Jul →
inferno13–60.0313%4 Jun →
dust213–100.0524%3 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.0325%2 Jun →
ancient13–10.0819%31 May →
dust210–130.0221%31 May →
anubis7–13-0.0311%26 May →
ancient3–13-0.0513%24 May →
inferno13–50.0435%22 May →
inferno11–13-0.0211%22 May →
anubis13–60.0920%17 May →
dust213–80.0223%3 May →
mirage13–10-0.037%2 May →
cache11–130.0517%30 Apr →
dust213–90.0019%29 Apr →
inferno6–130.0014%27 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0410%24 Apr →
dust213–7-0.0215%17 Apr →
mirage3–13-0.0321%6 Apr →
dust213–60.0637%18 Jan →
inferno6–13-0.0119%9 Jan →
nuke13–9-0.009%7 Jan →
mirage4–13-0.0615%7 Jan →
ancient5–13-0.039%7 Jan →
nuke15–150.0117%7 Jan →
dust213–7-0.0419%7 Jan →
mirage6–130.0131%24 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.048%25 Sept →
mirage13–70.0120%25 Sept →
dust27–13-0.088%24 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0314%14 Jan →
dust29–00.0220%28 Dec →
inferno11–130.0411%27 Dec →
ancient12–12-0.0113%27 Dec →
anubis5–13-0.0914%19 Dec →
dust213–20.1737%18 Dec →
mirage6–13-0.0018%16 Dec →
train13–50.0314%15 Dec →
inferno7–130.0120%8 Nov →
dust23–130.0419%1 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.098%19 Mar →
mirage10–130.0917%15 Mar →
ancient16–140.0715%15 Mar →
anubis13–100.0526%10 Mar →
ancient6–130.0522%10 Mar →
ancient4–13-0.103%10 Mar →
anubis13–30.0214%10 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.0212%9 Mar →
inferno13–100.0420%9 Mar →
anubis7–13-0.126%9 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0319%9 Mar →
mirage13–100.0019%6 Mar →
ancient13–50.0210%5 Mar →
anubis13–160.0819%5 Mar →
ancient9–130.034%5 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0422%5 Mar →
ancient13–160.036%5 Mar →
ancient13–90.0421%4 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0917%4 Mar →
anubis13–9-0.0316%3 Mar →
mirage12–160.0119%2 Mar →
mirage13–7-0.0220%2 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.0126%2 Mar →
mirage14–160.0117%2 Mar →
anubis11–130.0115%1 Mar →
inferno19–22-0.0221%27 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0212%26 Feb →
mirage13–70.0619%26 Feb →
vertigo14–160.0226%26 Feb →
mirage17–190.0521%26 Feb →
ancient13–10-0.0122%26 Feb →
ancient8–130.0015%26 Feb →
mirage13–90.0213%23 Feb →
anubis8–13-0.0930%23 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0715%23 Feb →
ancient5–13-0.0619%23 Feb →
ancient13–11-0.0118%22 Feb →
anubis7–130.0214%22 Feb →
nuke13–100.0317%22 Feb →
anubis13–60.0914%22 Feb →
anubis13–16-0.0116%20 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0012%20 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0513%20 Feb →
ancient13–40.0220%19 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.049%21 Jan →
mirage18–22-0.0012%20 Dec →
anubis9–13-0.0519%7 Dec →
ancient5–13-0.0522%7 Dec →
anubis13–9-0.0122%29 Nov →
inferno16–140.005%20 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.057%20 Nov →
ancient10–130.0114%17 Nov →
anubis13–90.0223%2 Nov →
anubis11–130.0111%2 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.060%2 Nov →
ancient14–16-0.0118%13 Oct →
inferno13–10.0433%27 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0217%27 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.