Nemeses

Nemeses — CS2 Stats

76561197998803307[U:1:38537579]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

461Tracked matches38%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating1.9 LearningSupport
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 3,893 +481 13 Mar – 6 Jun · 9 days played
3,3503,901peak 3,90113 Mar6 Jun
4,070Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2025-03-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim14
Positioning25
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39–56–5Last 10039%Win rateLLWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · −70ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Last 20

  • 6–13–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 665ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim1.4
Utility3.0
Positioning2.5
Opening Duels0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 66% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 10% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 674ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim1.4
Positioning2.5
Utility3.0
Mechanics2.2
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact1.0

Composite 1.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.06−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.06
Reaction time661ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 721ms → last ⅓ avg 661ms
Headshot accuracy12.2%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 11.5% → last ⅓ avg 12.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 5 May →
25%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · inferno, 2 Nov →
500msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · vertigo, 20 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 17 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 55% over 11infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B168–850%-0.04
nukeC156–940%-0.03
mirageD134–931%-0.05
ancientC114–736%-0.05
anubisA116–555%-0.01
overpassD72–529%-0.04
infernoD71–614%-0.03
trainB63–350%-0.04
vertigo—43–175%-0.02
cache—20–20%-0.10
jura—21–150%-0.05
palacio—11–0100%-0.05
grail—10–10%-0.07
agency—10–10%-0.06
basalt—10–10%-0.05
whistle—10–10%-0.28
palais—10–10%-0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.5%Headshot accuracy
23.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
26.4%Spray accuracy
59.9%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
674msReaction time
9.7%T opening success
36.7%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
6.68HE damage / grenade
3.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.5029% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4341 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 9.7221% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo9–13-0.0723%6 Nov →
cache10–13-0.1218%6 Nov →
nuke13–2-0.0413%22 Oct →
cache8–13-0.070%22 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.078%22 Oct →
dust210–13-0.1124%22 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0512%21 Oct →
dust213–9-0.044%20 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0210%20 Oct →
vertigo13–4-0.0714%20 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0214%19 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.029%19 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0416%18 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0917%18 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.054%18 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.114%17 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.058%19 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0320%28 Mar →
overpass7–13-0.089%28 Mar →
nuke7–13-0.086%17 Mar →
anubis13–30.0217%17 Mar →
overpass13–4-0.0411%15 Mar →
mirage5–13-0.058%15 Mar →
inferno16–13-0.0710%14 Jan →
dust213–70.0216%14 Jan →
ancient14–16-0.1010%11 Jan →
ancient7–13-0.0220%28 Nov →
nuke6–13-0.075%28 Nov →
dust25–13-0.114%27 Nov →
nuke5–0-0.0420%27 Nov →
ancient13–11-0.0610%26 Nov →
mirage11–13-0.0617%13 Nov →
dust213–5-0.0721%13 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0412%6 Nov →
nuke13–90.048%6 Nov →
dust213–10.0316%6 Nov →
ancient13–11-0.049%6 Nov →
palacio13–11-0.0518%2 Nov →
mirage13–7-0.0815%2 Nov →
inferno12–12-0.0425%2 Nov →
dust213–8-0.0717%22 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0015%22 Oct →
overpass4–13-0.096%22 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0514%30 Sept →
dust24–0-0.0017%30 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.065%30 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.025%30 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.019%25 Sept →
inferno12–120.0617%25 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.073%25 Sept →
jura11–13-0.067%27 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.088%6 Jun →
anubis13–40.0210%6 Jun →
anubis16–12-0.0011%5 Jun →
ancient5–13-0.0811%5 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0116%27 May →
train13–40.006%27 May →
overpass13–40.0210%27 May →
nuke13–60.017%27 May →
anubis13–40.087%27 May →
dust28–13-0.0714%22 May →
nuke1–13-0.0918%22 May →
anubis10–130.0413%22 May →
anubis9–13-0.054%10 May →
jura13–11-0.0513%8 May →
grail9–13-0.077%7 May →
agency4–13-0.068%7 May →
overpass8–13-0.0610%5 May →
inferno11–13-0.0118%5 May →
mirage13–70.0810%5 May →
anubis7–13-0.0715%15 Apr →
nuke10–130.023%15 Apr →
train8–13-0.088%10 Apr →
inferno9–13-0.0325%10 Apr →
anubis13–110.0215%10 Apr →
dust210–13-0.039%10 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.119%9 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.057%25 Mar →
basalt11–13-0.0512%23 Mar →
nuke8–13-0.0316%23 Mar →
train13–7-0.0120%23 Mar →
train5–13-0.087%18 Mar →
whistle2–9-0.284%18 Mar →
palais5–9-0.1713%18 Mar →
vertigo9–70.029%18 Mar →
inferno5–9-0.067%18 Mar →
mirage13–0-0.027%17 Mar →
nuke4–13-0.056%17 Mar →
vertigo13–60.068%17 Mar →
dust213–10.0121%17 Mar →
inferno15–15-0.0410%16 Mar →
overpass0–13-0.0913%16 Mar →
dust213–110.0310%14 Mar →
train3–13-0.087%14 Mar →
nuke12–160.049%13 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0611%12 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0513%12 Mar →
nuke13–80.0219%12 Mar →
overpass12–120.0413%12 Mar →
train13–20.0116%12 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.