™GhosT

™GhosT — CS2 Stats

RE76561197998752848[U:1:38487120]Steam profile ↗

545Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,743Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,108Purple band · top ~28% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12017 of 18838 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate53.2%48.1%above
Shot accuracy15.4%12.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.311.08above
Match win rate51.8%46.5%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Pink band player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG™GhosTPREMIER15,108 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning49
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52426Last 10052%Win rateLLWLLLTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4
Aggression6.1
Utility6.7
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.9
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time528ms−106ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — mirage 1–4
130Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA36211558%0.03
dust2C23101343%0.01
infernoB147750%0.03
anubisD93633%-0.00
ancientA85363%0.04
nukeA53260%-0.02
cache42250%0.03
train110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,457Lifetime kills
1.31K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
2,020Matches
51.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
53.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
15.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
7,286MVPs
1,463Hours (in match)
2,741Bombs planted
685Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

8,209dust2
3,399inferno
1,603nuke
799train
351vertigo
187lake
147cbble
105dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

28Matches
61%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
95.9ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
546msReaction time
40.4%T opening success
34.1%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
7.81HE damage / grenade
26.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.0665% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–13-0.0314%28 Aug
mirage9–130.0613%28 Aug
mirage13–70.1915%28 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0430%28 Aug
mirage7–130.0614%24 Aug
inferno9–130.0614%24 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0320%24 Aug
dust213–100.0620%24 Aug
dust21–13-0.066%24 Aug
anubis13–70.0023%23 Aug
dust213–10-0.0021%23 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0615%23 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0527%22 Aug
mirage12–12-0.049%22 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0322%22 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0516%17 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0312%17 Aug
mirage13–80.0427%16 Aug
nuke16–130.0315%16 Aug
mirage13–100.0134%15 Aug
inferno13–60.1226%15 Aug
mirage13–100.0326%15 Aug
anubis13–30.0625%15 Aug
mirage1–40.2156%15 Aug
dust211–130.0514%15 Aug
dust27–13-0.069%15 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0425%15 Aug
inferno13–70.0124%14 Aug
inferno13–90.0615%12 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0321%11 Aug
dust21–13-0.080%9 Aug
mirage13–100.0521%9 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0721%9 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0113%8 Aug
cache13–110.1120%4 Aug
mirage8–130.0029%3 Aug
dust26–130.0528%3 Aug
inferno13–70.0515%3 Aug
mirage13–20.0010%2 Aug
dust22–130.0225%2 Aug
inferno6–130.0424%30 Jul
mirage13–100.0516%27 Jul
ancient13–10.1626%27 Jul
mirage13–50.0713%27 Jul
cache13–70.0634%27 Jul
dust213–7-0.0426%27 Jul
inferno13–60.0314%26 Jul
mirage15–150.0023%25 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0030%25 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0020%25 Jul
dust213–40.0835%25 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0018%23 Jul
mirage14–160.0518%22 Jul
mirage13–90.0519%22 Jul
ancient13–60.0413%21 Jul
dust213–8-0.0319%20 Jul
mirage13–40.0317%20 Jul
ancient16–130.0417%20 Jul
mirage13–30.1117%20 Jul
dust23–13-0.0618%20 Jul
mirage13–00.0926%20 Jul
dust23–130.0717%19 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0314%19 Jul
dust213–5-0.0224%19 Jul
ancient9–130.0418%19 Jul
mirage16–140.0417%18 Jul
dust212–160.0125%17 Jul
dust25–13-0.0318%16 Jul
dust213–110.0224%16 Jul
cache15–150.0018%14 Jul
inferno13–20.1219%14 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0129%13 Jul
train13–60.0228%13 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0221%13 Jul
cache15–15-0.0313%12 Jul
mirage13–110.0318%12 Jul
dust211–130.0115%12 Jul
mirage13–50.0213%8 Jul
dust213–70.0119%8 Jul
anubis13–80.0330%8 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0318%6 Jul
anubis7–130.0128%6 Jul
mirage11–130.0119%6 Jul
dust22–13-0.0219%5 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0510%3 Jul
mirage13–80.0757%2 Jul
nuke7–40.0022%2 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0225%2 Jul
inferno13–90.039%30 Jun
mirage13–20.0825%25 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0619%24 Jun
dust213–90.1320%24 Jun
mirage6–130.0121%24 Jun
dust24–70.1019%24 Jun
inferno5–130.0532%23 Jun
mirage13–70.0215%22 Jun
dust213–50.0714%22 Jun
anubis6–130.0121%20 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0611%20 Jun
ancient13–30.1027%20 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →