Mulumon

Mulumon — CS2 Stats

FI76561197998402080[U:1:38136352]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

324Tracked matches37%Win rate2021Tracked since
852Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 26 Jun 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,345 -1,440 26 Jun7 Mar · 7 days played
11,34514,420peak 14,42026 Jun7 Mar
14,420Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2024-06-26

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate30.3%43.8%44.8%14.5% short
Shot accuracy15.8%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.021.021.04meets
Match win rate44.8%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMulumonFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning55
Utility26

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45514Last 10045%Win rateWLLWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · −59ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility2.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 633ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning5.5
Utility2.6
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time641ms+51ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 641ms
Headshot accuracy10.2%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 8.8% → last ⅓ avg 10.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–7 · nuke, 1 Jul
36%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · mirage, 7 Mar
422msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · nuke, 26 Feb
13–1Biggest win · train, 7 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 25% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisD2051525%-0.02
ancientC1881044%-0.02
nukeB157847%0.01
dust2B126650%0.00
infernoA95456%0.03
mirageC73443%-0.04
vertigoS64267%-0.04
overpass31233%0.03
office32167%-0.02
train21150%-0.08
mills21150%-0.02
italy110100%-0.04
cache1010%-0.04
thera110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

39,077Lifetime kills
1.02K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,114Matches
44.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
30.3%Headshot %
15.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
3,947MVPs
852Hours (in match)
2,819Bombs planted
464Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-474,570
P902,704
AWP2,393
SG 5532,027
AUG2,006
Tec-91,275

Lifetime map wins

4,640cbble
1,800dust2
1,418inferno
1,197nuke
423office
392train
346vertigo
120lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

83Matches
40%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
78.1ADR
28%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1947%1.0815.2
Ancient1644%1.0314.6
Anubis1233%0.9012.6
Nuke1040%0.9012.8
Overpass1030%1.0314.7
Mirage743%1.1415.6
Dust2520%1.0323.2
Vertigo250%1.1011.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.9%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.1%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
633msReaction time
39.2%T opening success
52.2%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
11.01HE damage / grenade
1.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.936% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4348 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.2068% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
italy13–10-0.0420%22 May
cache3–13-0.049%22 May
overpass11–13-0.015%22 May
ancient13–11-0.052%22 May
dust24–13-0.017%22 May
ancient4–13-0.037%25 Feb
anubis13–80.0513%18 Feb
nuke10–130.106%14 Feb
anubis16–19-0.0311%11 Feb
ancient13–6-0.026%6 Feb
dust223–250.0616%28 Jan
ancient13–160.015%6 Nov
overpass11–13-0.025%6 Nov
inferno13–70.078%24 Sept
inferno7–130.0217%10 Sept
mirage13–70.036%10 Sept
inferno5–13-0.037%3 Sept
dust214–160.009%2 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0012%2 Apr
ancient6–13-0.009%26 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0216%26 Mar
nuke13–70.044%19 Mar
inferno13–90.036%19 Mar
mirage5–13-0.150%7 Mar
train6–13-0.1125%7 Mar
train13–1-0.060%7 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0936%7 Mar
anubis0–13-0.099%26 Feb
nuke13–7-0.047%26 Feb
ancient13–110.0119%14 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0310%14 Feb
inferno13–50.0113%14 Feb
dust210–130.0414%14 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0514%14 Feb
anubis13–70.0216%12 Feb
ancient3–13-0.0712%12 Feb
anubis4–13-0.039%12 Feb
inferno13–40.0912%12 Feb
anubis13–70.063%12 Feb
ancient13–40.0013%11 Feb
inferno5–12-0.019%11 Feb
ancient6–130.012%11 Feb
dust213–9-0.019%11 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0115%11 Feb
nuke13–7-0.0616%10 Feb
anubis12–160.0213%10 Feb
anubis1–8-0.0414%10 Feb
mirage15–15-0.0111%10 Feb
mirage13–4-0.0213%10 Feb
anubis9–13-0.035%4 Feb
nuke6–130.017%4 Feb
nuke5–13-0.025%3 Feb
anubis4–13-0.069%3 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0324%3 Feb
nuke13–100.047%22 Oct
anubis7–130.018%22 Oct
ancient13–50.0511%22 Oct
anubis2–13-0.093%15 Oct
ancient10–130.0213%15 Oct
anubis1–13-0.1011%10 Oct
anubis7–13-0.0510%2 Oct
inferno7–13-0.022%2 Oct
nuke4–13-0.028%18 Sept
ancient20–220.0011%18 Sept
ancient13–5-0.0213%9 Sept
inferno13–50.108%9 Sept
anubis13–50.087%4 Sept
dust213–40.0311%1 Sept
vertigo13–5-0.0511%12 Aug
office13–40.0616%26 Jul
thera13–30.077%24 Jul
office13–9-0.125%24 Jul
dust213–30.0111%23 Jul
office12–120.0010%23 Jul
dust215–150.0010%16 Jul
vertigo10–13-0.0915%16 Jul
overpass9–10.1014%16 Jul
ancient13–8-0.013%14 Jul
vertigo13–11-0.039%14 Jul
vertigo13–5-0.057%14 Jul
anubis11–130.024%14 Jul
anubis6–13-0.042%14 Jul
dust213–50.039%14 Jul
nuke13–100.125%13 Jul
anubis13–110.029%12 Jul
vertigo13–110.029%12 Jul
dust213–4-0.0115%12 Jul
dust213–7-0.0117%1 Jul
ancient10–13-0.077%1 Jul
nuke13–70.145%1 Jul
ancient13–30.0010%1 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0111%1 Jul
anubis11–130.026%1 Jul
dust29–13-0.0813%1 Jul
mirage13–60.028%28 Jun
ancient3–13-0.110%26 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0614%26 Jun
vertigo14–16-0.016%26 Jun
mills7–13-0.114%26 Jun
mills13–100.089%26 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →