CruX!

CruX! — CS2 Stats

DE76561197996919826[U:1:36654098]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,554Tracked matches62%Win rate2022Tracked since
5,596Hours in CS54Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,373Purple band · top ~15% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,202 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,373 +1,165 1 Sept – 12 Nov · 18 days played
16,46518,495peak 18,4951 Sept12 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,202 +0 1 Sept – 27 Oct · 4 observations
1,2021,202peak 1,2021 Sept27 Oct
18,495Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,202Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-09-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,202
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 149 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 122 below peak (18,495)
  • +1,908 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,627 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate41.7%45.7%46.8%5.1% short
Shot accuracy5.9%12.7%13.0%7.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.051.060.08 short
Match win rate43.1%45.7%46.3%3.2% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 8 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCruX!FACEITLevel 7 · 1,202 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,373 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,202csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning35
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–41–4Last 10055%Win rateWLWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · −47ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility6.4
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 59% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning3.5
Utility6.4
Mechanics1.9
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact9.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time570ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–3 · boulder, 10 Oct →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 7–2 · mirage, 29 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 3 Nov →
13–0Biggest win · shelter, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2715–1256%-0.01
infernoA1610–663%-0.01
nukeB158–753%0.01
cacheS96–367%-0.03
anubisC73–443%-0.01
ancientD62–433%-0.02
vertigo—32–167%0.07
train—31–233%0.00
fachwerk—31–233%0.03
overpass—31–233%-0.00
italy—21–150%-0.00
office—22–0100%0.03
mirage—11–0100%-0.06
shelter—11–0100%0.11
boulder—11–0100%0.25
poseidon—10–10%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

128,590Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
7,518Matches
43.1%Match win rate
41.7%Headshot %
5.9%Shot accuracy
14,108MVPs
3,127Hours (in match)
10,245Bombs planted
1,954Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,883
AWP9,620
P908,082
MP77,891
Tec-96,008
FAMAS5,149

Lifetime map wins

22,611inferno
17,337dust2
12,928nuke
1,262vertigo
439train
267office
62ar_shoots
50italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,876Matches
49%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
76.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno52054%1.0515.4
Dust251947%0.9413.9
Nuke29659%1.1316.3
Anubis24343%0.9614.9
Ancient11038%0.9014.2
Mirage6329%0.8713.8
Overpass3754%0.9716.2
Cache3546%0.9814.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
58.6%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
573msReaction time
26.8%T opening success
38.7%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
11.7%Flash assists
7.49HE damage / grenade
8.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.7584% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–3-0.030%13 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.0711%13 Nov →
inferno13–8-0.0420%13 Nov →
nuke13–110.0320%13 Nov →
inferno13–70.0420%13 Nov →
anubis13–110.0415%12 Nov →
nuke16–140.0512%12 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.0813%9 Nov →
dust222–18-0.0412%9 Nov →
vertigo13–100.0517%9 Nov →
cache11–13-0.0811%9 Nov →
italy9–13-0.0416%8 Nov →
dust213–6-0.019%8 Nov →
dust216–13-0.028%8 Nov →
cache13–8-0.0219%7 Nov →
cache13–9-0.0518%7 Nov →
cache13–50.0114%7 Nov →
nuke2–13-0.037%7 Nov →
inferno2–9-0.1927%7 Nov →
train13–30.0729%6 Nov →
ancient13–110.0311%6 Nov →
ancient9–130.0415%4 Nov →
dust29–130.0712%4 Nov →
vertigo12–120.1330%3 Nov →
ancient5–13-0.0428%3 Nov →
train5–13-0.0417%3 Nov →
inferno6–13-0.0116%31 Oct →
inferno13–30.0726%30 Oct →
nuke12–160.019%30 Oct →
dust213–50.0823%30 Oct →
dust213–80.0115%30 Oct →
dust27–13-0.076%30 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.039%29 Oct →
inferno13–110.0313%29 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0621%29 Oct →
office13–8-0.0218%29 Oct →
mirage7–2-0.0633%29 Oct →
dust213–60.0517%29 Oct →
inferno13–110.0210%29 Oct →
dust29–130.0213%29 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0314%28 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0310%28 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0418%28 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0131%28 Oct →
dust213–7-0.086%28 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0310%26 Oct →
nuke13–60.0718%24 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0119%22 Oct →
inferno7–130.0321%22 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0214%22 Oct →
dust24–130.0316%21 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0226%18 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0113%18 Oct →
dust213–70.0226%17 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0718%17 Oct →
inferno16–120.0226%17 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0115%17 Oct →
dust213–70.037%17 Oct →
anubis13–20.1121%17 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0326%15 Oct →
anubis12–16-0.0316%15 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.040%15 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0422%14 Oct →
dust210–130.0112%13 Oct →
nuke13–40.0226%13 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0120%13 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0123%12 Oct →
fachwerk12–12-0.0013%12 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0116%11 Oct →
shelter13–00.1132%11 Oct →
boulder13–30.2516%10 Oct →
fachwerk13–30.0118%10 Oct →
fachwerk6–130.1015%10 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0515%10 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0311%10 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0410%9 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0314%9 Oct →
nuke13–40.1011%9 Oct →
cache1–13-0.0719%9 Oct →
inferno6–130.0420%9 Oct →
dust29–130.0316%9 Oct →
dust215–150.0216%9 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0432%9 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0420%6 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0417%6 Oct →
vertigo13–70.0312%5 Oct →
overpass5–13-0.0419%5 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0322%5 Oct →
nuke13–70.1228%2 Oct →
italy13–60.0417%2 Oct →
cache13–60.0113%1 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0417%1 Oct →
poseidon5–90.0025%1 Oct →
overpass9–60.0224%1 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0321%30 Sept →
office13–30.0818%30 Sept →
overpass10–130.0213%30 Sept →
cache13–110.0213%30 Sept →
train12–12-0.0218%30 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0327%28 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.