ale

ale — CS2 Stats

76561197995532039[U:1:35266311]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,994Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating26,337Top 10% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10338 of 251515 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,541 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 26,337 → 26,337
0Faceit ELO · 2,541 → 2,541
+81Tracked matches · now 2,994
+3.3ppWin rate · 53.3% → 56.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,337 +1,458 2 Apr – 20 Sept · 11 days played
24,87926,337peak 26,3372 Apr20 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,541 +0 3 Sept – 20 Sept · 2 observations
2,5412,541peak 2,5413 Sept20 Sept
26,895Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,541Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-03-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,541
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 459 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,337
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,663 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGaleFACEITLevel 10 · 2,541 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,337 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,541csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning62
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–39–2Last 10059%Win rateLWWWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +4.2pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 476ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility7.0
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.2
Utility7.0
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time498ms−61ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 498ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 10 May →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 11 Apr →
352msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · anubis, 6 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 8 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 77% over 13cacheWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS1913–668%0.04
ancientA1710–759%0.03
mirageB157–847%0.00
anubisS1310–377%0.02
dust2A127–558%0.02
cacheB115–645%0.00
infernoB63–350%0.01
overpassS64–267%-0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,364Matches
52%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
79.2ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke26961%1.2216.4
Ancient25846%1.0315.4
Anubis22857%1.1516.2
Mirage18246%1.0714.9
Inferno15950%1.1015.7
Dust212848%1.0514.8
Train5652%1.0214.5
Overpass4144%1.1117.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
488msReaction time
34.6%T opening success
60.0%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
12.0%Flash assists
8.39HE damage / grenade
10.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.5709% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–13-0.0421%6 Oct →
nuke13–50.1225%5 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0113%4 Oct →
ancient13–80.0315%2 Oct →
mirage9–130.0013%2 Oct →
ancient13–40.1019%2 Oct →
nuke13–80.0829%30 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0518%28 Sept →
ancient13–50.0823%26 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0216%26 Sept →
dust213–90.0127%26 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0212%15 Sept →
dust213–160.0415%14 Sept →
ancient10–130.0419%9 Sept →
dust213–10.0814%8 Sept →
inferno13–60.0417%8 Sept →
anubis13–80.037%8 Sept →
ancient4–130.0111%6 Sept →
anubis13–110.0414%6 Sept →
dust213–30.0214%4 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0215%3 Sept →
ancient9–130.0123%2 Sept →
nuke13–30.0420%30 Aug →
inferno11–130.0329%26 Aug →
anubis13–110.0913%24 Aug →
cache13–90.047%22 Aug →
cache13–8-0.039%18 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0538%16 Aug →
cache14–16-0.0326%5 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0228%5 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0411%6 Jun →
overpass13–100.0931%6 Jun →
mirage10–130.0623%6 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0417%6 Jun →
ancient13–8-0.0214%6 Jun →
dust27–130.036%6 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0117%6 Jun →
ancient13–30.1228%6 Jun →
dust212–16-0.0317%6 Jun →
anubis13–90.0825%6 Jun →
ancient13–70.0934%6 Jun →
cache13–10.0617%16 May →
mirage10–130.0320%16 May →
anubis13–110.0117%10 May →
inferno16–14-0.0117%10 May →
cache13–30.139%10 May →
cache5–13-0.0211%10 May →
mirage13–11-0.0317%5 May →
nuke8–13-0.0216%5 May →
ancient16–140.0510%5 May →
ancient10–13-0.0014%28 Apr →
overpass13–16-0.088%26 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0011%26 Apr →
dust213–5-0.0617%26 Apr →
cache13–9-0.0221%26 Apr →
mirage13–9-0.0022%26 Apr →
cache4–13-0.0222%26 Apr →
anubis13–7-0.0419%26 Apr →
ancient13–4-0.0418%25 Apr →
overpass13–7-0.063%25 Apr →
overpass10–13-0.0121%25 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0121%25 Apr →
anubis13–70.0211%24 Apr →
nuke13–40.1127%23 Apr →
dust215–150.0710%22 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.0213%21 Apr →
inferno12–160.0320%18 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0027%18 Apr →
ancient8–130.0513%18 Apr →
nuke11–130.0627%18 Apr →
dust213–7-0.0125%14 Apr →
overpass13–8-0.0211%11 Apr →
nuke15–150.0031%11 Apr →
mirage13–20.1138%11 Apr →
dust213–30.1030%11 Apr →
nuke11–130.0424%6 Apr →
nuke13–70.0112%5 Apr →
mirage4–130.0426%5 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.0524%5 Apr →
nuke13–10.0417%4 Apr →
vertigo4–13-0.0411%4 Apr →
ancient13–90.0423%4 Apr →
nuke13–30.0332%4 Apr →
overpass9–20.0428%4 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0521%4 Apr →
nuke10–130.0414%2 Apr →
dust213–50.0315%2 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0028%2 Apr →
anubis13–90.0618%2 Apr →
anubis13–100.0217%1 Apr →
nuke10–130.0527%1 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0113%31 Mar →
nuke13–20.1137%29 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.0320%24 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0116%22 Mar →
inferno13–110.0213%22 Mar →
nuke19–17-0.0119%18 Mar →
nuke13–90.0118%18 Mar →
nuke13–60.0720%18 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0114%18 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.