Kapybara

Kapybara — CS2 Stats

76561197995189596[U:1:34923868]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,163Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating19,299Top 50% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#95772 of 259939 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,142 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,299 +667 8 Sept – 30 Oct · 17 days played
17,34019,299peak 19,2998 Sept30 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,142 +0 8 Sept – 27 Sept · 3 observations
2,1422,142peak 2,1428 Sept27 Sept
19,299Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,142Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-09-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,142
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 358 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-08
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-08

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,299
  • +1,558 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 701 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKapybaraFACEITLevel 9 · 2,142 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,299 · Purple bandPEAK ELO2,142csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning67
Utility78

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–49Last 10051%Win rateLLWWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.5pp headshot accuracy · −51ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility7.8
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.7
Utility7.8
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time498ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 538ms → last ⅓ avg 498ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 7–0 · inferno, 16 Sept →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · nuke, 7 Oct →
344msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 1 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 7 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
9–16In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 65% over 26dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2617–965%0.01
infernoB2411–1346%0.01
ancientA2212–1055%0.01
anubisB136–746%0.01
dust2D82–625%-0.01
cacheC52–340%0.06
mirage—21–150%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,582Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
86.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke26355%1.2117.1
Ancient20851%1.1716.9
Inferno15049%1.1616.3
Anubis13855%1.1416.1
Dust210545%1.0616.4
Overpass5535%1.1217.1
Mirage3639%1.1317.3
Train2966%1.2917.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
84.4%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
496msReaction time
50.0%T opening success
60.8%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
15.0%Flash assists
9.62HE damage / grenade
15.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke17–190.0115%31 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.057%31 Oct →
nuke13–90.0322%30 Oct →
ancient13–110.0724%30 Oct →
inferno13–50.0418%30 Oct →
anubis13–30.0511%30 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0713%29 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0217%25 Oct →
ancient13–50.0523%25 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0016%24 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0615%24 Oct →
cache5–130.0530%24 Oct →
cache13–110.0318%24 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0218%24 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0321%24 Oct →
mirage13–30.0610%23 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0914%23 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0228%22 Oct →
inferno13–60.0730%22 Oct →
nuke13–70.0115%22 Oct →
ancient10–130.0313%20 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0225%18 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0018%18 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0617%17 Oct →
ancient11–130.0718%17 Oct →
nuke13–110.0414%17 Oct →
ancient13–70.0819%16 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0214%16 Oct →
dust213–100.0816%16 Oct →
nuke13–110.0517%16 Oct →
nuke16–12-0.0113%15 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0021%15 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0529%14 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0420%14 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0116%11 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.078%11 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0215%11 Oct →
nuke13–100.0311%10 Oct →
anubis13–50.0324%10 Oct →
ancient13–50.0120%10 Oct →
dust211–130.0117%9 Oct →
cache11–130.0517%9 Oct →
anubis13–80.0614%7 Oct →
nuke13–10.0436%7 Oct →
inferno11–130.0315%7 Oct →
nuke13–20.0921%6 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0613%6 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0314%4 Oct →
ancient13–50.0615%4 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0910%1 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0319%1 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0012%1 Oct →
nuke13–60.0416%1 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.059%30 Sept →
ancient14–160.0315%30 Sept →
inferno13–90.0614%30 Sept →
dust210–130.0214%29 Sept →
inferno10–130.0614%29 Sept →
ancient13–80.0415%29 Sept →
anubis11–130.0417%27 Sept →
nuke13–90.0113%27 Sept →
nuke17–190.0311%26 Sept →
nuke16–140.0111%26 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0319%26 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0615%25 Sept →
anubis13–100.0920%25 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0016%25 Sept →
cache11–130.0625%25 Sept →
inferno13–90.0416%24 Sept →
nuke13–70.009%24 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0514%24 Sept →
mirage7–130.0014%24 Sept →
inferno13–10.0116%23 Sept →
ancient13–70.0614%23 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0315%23 Sept →
inferno17–190.0517%22 Sept →
nuke13–30.0213%21 Sept →
anubis13–90.0414%21 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0212%20 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0513%20 Sept →
inferno13–70.0119%20 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0022%17 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.047%17 Sept →
inferno13–100.0220%17 Sept →
nuke13–100.049%17 Sept →
cache13–110.0928%16 Sept →
inferno7–00.1733%16 Sept →
nuke13–30.1030%16 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0428%16 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0114%16 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.045%15 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0422%15 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0324%14 Sept →
ancient6–130.0019%13 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.047%13 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0110%13 Sept →
inferno19–160.0217%12 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0111%12 Sept →
inferno13–80.0121%12 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0311%12 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.