MadMachine

MadMachine — CS2 Stats

DE76561197994674788[U:1:34409060]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,371Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,194Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,754Top 50% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#86649 of 252033 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,754 +2,390 31 Aug – 14 Oct · 30 days played
17,18620,118peak 20,11831 Aug14 Oct
20,316Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 364 below peak (20,118)
  • -19 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 246 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-23
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,110), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate42.7%44.8%45.7%3.0% short
Shot accuracy15.7%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.371.031.05above
Match win rate42.9%45.2%45.7%2.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMadMachineFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,754 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning76
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateLWWWWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −6.4pp headshot accuracy · −3ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility5.0
Positioning7.6
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 71% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 71% on T to 53% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning7.6
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels7.9
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time569ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 14 Oct →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · cache, 3 Oct →
438msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · dust2, 6 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 18 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 18anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2814–1450%0.00
cacheB2110–1148%0.00
dust2S1812–667%0.01
ancientC176–1135%0.01
mirageA85–363%0.02
anubisD51–420%-0.00
nuke—30–30%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

134,612Lifetime kills
1.37K/D · Top 10% of Level 6 players
5,549Matches
42.9%Match win rate
42.7%Headshot %
15.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
12,392MVPs
2,834Hours (in match)
7,456Bombs planted
1,544Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4755,337
AWP13,510
FAMAS3,043
P2502,946
MP92,494
UMP-452,119

Lifetime map wins

8,765dust2
7,672inferno
3,154nuke
2,282cbble
964train
893vertigo
485office
218lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

291Matches
51%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
76.6ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno4262%1.1815.6
Mirage3647%0.9614.1
Anubis3043%0.9514.1
Dust21753%1.0518.5
Nuke1560%1.2017.5
Ancient1533%0.8313.5
Vertigo714%0.8013.1
Overpass650%1.5817.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
85.1%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
572msReaction time
71.3%T opening success
53.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
7.52HE damage / grenade
6.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno1–13-0.078%15 Oct →
inferno6–1-0.050%15 Oct →
ancient13–80.0319%14 Oct →
dust213–90.0114%14 Oct →
ancient13–60.1110%14 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.093%14 Oct →
dust214–160.0414%12 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0210%11 Oct →
anubis8–130.0425%11 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.027%11 Oct →
inferno10–130.0119%8 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0216%8 Oct →
dust213–50.0425%8 Oct →
inferno5–120.0118%6 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0114%6 Oct →
dust213–70.0013%6 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.0824%4 Oct →
inferno5–130.1010%4 Oct →
inferno13–80.0316%3 Oct →
cache13–40.0719%3 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0218%3 Oct →
cache13–110.0532%3 Oct →
inferno13–70.0322%3 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.027%2 Oct →
inferno13–100.0313%1 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0320%1 Oct →
cache7–130.0424%30 Sept →
cache13–40.0319%29 Sept →
cache3–13-0.088%29 Sept →
cache13–60.0319%29 Sept →
inferno13–40.0414%27 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0030%26 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.056%26 Sept →
mirage13–80.0622%26 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0313%24 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0121%23 Sept →
mirage13–70.0616%23 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0920%22 Sept →
mirage13–70.0217%22 Sept →
inferno13–160.0516%22 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0413%21 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0114%21 Sept →
ancient11–130.0315%21 Sept →
mirage13–80.0310%20 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0126%20 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0119%20 Sept →
cache13–80.0511%19 Sept →
dust210–130.0416%19 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0220%18 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0017%18 Sept →
inferno13–20.027%18 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0221%18 Sept →
ancient8–130.054%18 Sept →
inferno7–130.0114%17 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.078%17 Sept →
dust213–110.0212%16 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0812%16 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0219%16 Sept →
inferno16–140.0120%16 Sept →
dust213–80.0627%16 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0327%14 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0721%10 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0223%10 Sept →
dust213–70.0420%10 Sept →
cache16–140.0212%10 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0123%9 Sept →
cache1–13-0.109%9 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0219%9 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0121%8 Sept →
inferno13–50.0721%8 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0120%8 Sept →
ancient1–130.0112%8 Sept →
cache8–130.0214%8 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0919%7 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0013%7 Sept →
inferno13–110.0811%7 Sept →
dust213–60.039%6 Sept →
cache13–110.0720%6 Sept →
anubis16–130.0417%6 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0316%6 Sept →
ancient13–90.1113%6 Sept →
ancient13–60.1126%5 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0212%4 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0612%4 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0127%4 Sept →
dust29–130.0424%4 Sept →
ancient13–80.0417%4 Sept →
inferno13–70.0116%4 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0117%3 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0210%3 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0215%3 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0712%2 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0016%2 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0212%1 Sept →
dust213–90.0010%1 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0116%1 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0118%31 Aug →
cache13–80.0420%31 Aug →
inferno11–130.0215%31 Aug →
cache10–130.028%31 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.