Aeeklez

Aeeklez — CS2 Stats

FR76561197993605863[U:1:33340135]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,103Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,809Top 50% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#98066 of 251944 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,809 +145 6 Aug – 9 Oct · 11 days played
17,92419,488peak 19,4886 Aug9 Oct
19,488Peak Premier in tracked matches
39Days played since 2026-06-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 679 below peak (19,488)
  • -679 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,191 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAeeklezFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,809 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning42
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–51–4Last 10045%Win rateLLWWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · +16ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Last 20

  • 7–11–2 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility3.8
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning4.2
Utility3.8
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact0.2

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time531ms−92ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 531ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%−5.7%
first ⅓ avg 27.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 9–6 · inferno, 31 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · shelter, 9 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 0–4 · train, 25 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · boulder, 23 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 50% over 14anubisWeakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B178–947%0.02
anubisD154–1127%0.01
infernoB147–750%0.02
nukeB136–746%0.02
cacheB115–645%0.04
trainC83–538%0.01
ancientB63–350%-0.02
boulder—43–175%0.00
mirage—30–30%0.02
shelter—33–0100%0.06
vertigo—31–233%-0.02
fachwerk—21–150%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

46Matches
52%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
87.0ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

12%1v1 clutch win
44%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno560%1.6522.4
Anubis333%1.4420.7
Nuke367%0.9415.3
Dust2250%1.3211.5
Vertigo1100%1.8815.0
Mirage1100%1.9019.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
76.2%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
541msReaction time
35.4%T opening success
38.9%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
0.8%Flash assists
7.36HE damage / grenade
6.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.3535% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–13-0.0120%11 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0526%11 Oct →
nuke13–70.1324%9 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0123%9 Oct →
mirage5–130.0033%9 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0511%6 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0021%3 Oct →
anubis13–70.0111%2 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0311%2 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0311%2 Oct →
cache13–70.2120%2 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0131%2 Oct →
dust27–130.0527%1 Oct →
train7–13-0.0033%1 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0132%1 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0317%30 Sept →
train0–4-0.070%25 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0521%23 Sept →
cache12–120.0117%23 Sept →
mirage12–120.0325%23 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0118%23 Sept →
train13–110.0113%19 Sept →
anubis7–130.0717%19 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0821%17 Sept →
cache6–80.0131%17 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0729%17 Sept →
dust21–110.0221%8 Sept →
cache13–60.1024%8 Sept →
ancient13–100.0123%5 Sept →
dust28–130.0121%31 Aug →
inferno9–60.2821%31 Aug →
nuke9–60.2621%31 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0327%27 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0117%22 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0340%22 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0216%22 Aug →
nuke13–30.0832%22 Aug →
boulder13–80.0117%14 Aug →
shelter13–70.0225%14 Aug →
anubis13–100.0025%13 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0620%13 Aug →
overpass13–7-0.1012%13 Aug →
inferno0–20.0550%10 Aug →
dust22–130.0644%10 Aug →
anubis6–130.0119%9 Aug →
shelter9–20.13100%9 Aug →
train3–00.1029%9 Aug →
nuke0–13-0.0341%9 Aug →
nuke1–13-0.0517%8 Aug →
vertigo7–13-0.0729%8 Aug →
boulder0–3-0.0838%8 Aug →
fachwerk13–4-0.0041%7 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0539%7 Aug →
anubis8–130.0822%6 Aug →
dust215–150.0024%6 Aug →
inferno13–110.0426%6 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0134%5 Aug →
cache10–130.0723%5 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0147%5 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0322%31 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0633%31 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0444%31 Jul →
vertigo9–130.0518%31 Jul →
inferno9–130.0330%27 Jul →
dust213–70.0825%27 Jul →
mirage5–130.0330%27 Jul →
inferno13–80.0120%25 Jul →
dust213–50.1726%25 Jul →
ancient11–130.0119%25 Jul →
anubis11–10-0.0027%25 Jul →
train4–13-0.0829%24 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0222%23 Jul →
train6–13-0.0421%23 Jul →
boulder13–20.0613%23 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0145%21 Jul →
inferno13–100.0612%21 Jul →
nuke13–50.0126%18 Jul →
cache10–130.0134%18 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0242%18 Jul →
anubis7–130.1216%18 Jul →
fachwerk11–13-0.0133%17 Jul →
vertigo8–8-0.0227%17 Jul →
shelter13–40.0219%17 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0720%17 Jul →
boulder13–60.0433%17 Jul →
train13–70.2226%15 Jul →
dust213–50.0325%11 Jul →
cache13–20.0840%11 Jul →
nuke10–130.0431%11 Jul →
dust213–30.0221%11 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0729%11 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0522%9 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0130%3 Jul →
nuke12–120.0331%3 Jul →
inferno13–60.0642%3 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0223%30 Jun →
anubis11–130.1033%30 Jun →
train7–13-0.0218%14 Jun →
cache9–130.0227%14 Jun →
dust213–70.0929%13 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.