Bladesway

Bladesway — CS2 Stats

NZ76561197993547381[U:1:33281653]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,894Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,846Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,107Purple band · top ~28% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,253 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Nov 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,107 -2,403 2 Sept – 9 Nov · 20 days played
14,65117,510peak 17,5102 Sept9 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,253 +0 2 Sept – 30 Oct · 3 observations
1,2531,253peak 1,2532 Sept30 Oct
17,510Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,253Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-09-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,253
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 98 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,403 below peak (17,510)
  • -1,065 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,893 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate66.8%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy6.8%11.2%12.0%5.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.390.991.02above
Match win rate29.2%43.9%44.7%15.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBladeswayFACEITLevel 4 · 1,253 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,107 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,253csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning42
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD59–38–3Last 10059%Win rateWLLLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +3.4pp headshot accuracy · +24ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 678ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.3 against its own average).

Aim4.7
Utility7.1
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 61% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning4.2
Utility7.1
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time578ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 8–4 · rush_001, 17 Oct →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 3–7 · rush_001, 26 Oct →
273msFastest reaction time · 5–1 · rush_001, 17 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 14 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
13–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 12anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA169–756%0.02
dust2C167–944%-0.02
infernoB157–847%-0.02
nukeS1210–283%-0.01
rush_001B126–650%-0.00
ancientA106–460%-0.02
cacheS97–278%-0.03
anubisC52–340%-0.04
vertigo—22–0100%0.01
train—22–0100%0.01
overpass—11–0100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

411,195Lifetime kills
1.39K/D · Top 10% of Level 4 players
14,267Matches
29.2%Match win rate
66.8%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 4 players
6.8%Shot accuracy
11,076MVPs
6,846Hours (in match)
5,635Bombs planted
2,631Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47172,930
AWP30,247
SSG 084,503
P2504,083

Lifetime map wins

14,264dust2
7,968inferno
5,268nuke
3,872vertigo
2,765train
644office
629cbble
226italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

152Matches
38%Win rate
0.71Avg K/D
59.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5739%0.7410.6
Dust22839%0.7611.4
Inferno2157%0.7510.8
Nuke1136%0.669.4
Ancient933%0.8410.0
Overpass250%0.467.5
Anubis20%0.366.5
Cache10%0.7821.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
77.0%Counter-strafing
13.5°Preaim
597msReaction time
35.9%T opening success
38.4%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
9.96HE damage / grenade
17.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.5053° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–90.0120%14 Nov →
ancient2–13-0.0630%10 Nov →
dust25–130.0023%10 Nov →
anubis8–13-0.0523%9 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0520%9 Nov →
inferno13–20.0116%8 Nov →
vertigo13–40.0916%8 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0517%8 Nov →
dust212–16-0.0314%8 Nov →
cache11–13-0.0410%8 Nov →
mirage13–9-0.0216%7 Nov →
mirage13–6-0.0231%7 Nov →
cache13–6-0.025%7 Nov →
ancient13–11-0.0118%7 Nov →
ancient11–13-0.038%6 Nov →
inferno2–13-0.0515%6 Nov →
mirage4–130.0929%6 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0317%6 Nov →
nuke13–11-0.078%6 Nov →
dust213–7-0.009%3 Nov →
inferno3–13-0.017%2 Nov →
nuke13–70.0626%2 Nov →
nuke13–6-0.0018%2 Nov →
nuke16–14-0.0120%1 Nov →
nuke10–13-0.038%1 Nov →
cache13–11-0.0412%1 Nov →
ancient13–4-0.0128%1 Nov →
inferno13–30.0019%1 Nov →
mirage1–00.000%31 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0411%31 Oct →
inferno12–12-0.0913%30 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0017%30 Oct →
train13–10-0.0721%30 Oct →
overpass13–5-0.0416%30 Oct →
nuke13–40.0311%29 Oct →
cache12–12-0.0727%29 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0820%28 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0826%28 Oct →
vertigo13–11-0.0621%28 Oct →
rush_0015–10.1027%28 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0217%26 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0016%26 Oct →
rush_0013–70.1067%26 Oct →
inferno13–60.0222%26 Oct →
inferno13–60.0017%25 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0818%25 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0821%25 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0533%25 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0315%25 Oct →
dust213–6-0.077%24 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0413%24 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0317%23 Oct →
inferno13–40.0315%23 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0324%23 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0619%23 Oct →
dust210–13-0.076%23 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0512%23 Oct →
cache13–90.0321%22 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0311%22 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.053%22 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0814%21 Oct →
dust213–11-0.037%21 Oct →
rush_0017–8-0.0811%21 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0426%20 Oct →
nuke13–40.0823%20 Oct →
rush_0018–7-0.067%20 Oct →
rush_0014–00.130%20 Oct →
mirage16–130.0818%19 Oct →
inferno3–130.0114%19 Oct →
rush_0015–8-0.0210%19 Oct →
rush_0010–4-0.2113%19 Oct →
inferno13–110.0011%19 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0222%19 Oct →
ancient13–110.0210%18 Oct →
train13–30.0818%18 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.039%18 Oct →
mirage13–70.0111%18 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0919%18 Oct →
anubis13–90.0221%18 Oct →
dust213–50.0919%18 Oct →
mirage13–1-0.0614%18 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0620%17 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0813%17 Oct →
rush_0018–40.1450%17 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0316%17 Oct →
dust213–10-0.007%17 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0021%17 Oct →
cache13–50.0125%17 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0424%17 Oct →
dust213–50.1419%17 Oct →
rush_0018–7-0.100%17 Oct →
mirage13–20.0614%17 Oct →
rush_0015–10.0720%17 Oct →
rush_0014–8-0.0215%16 Oct →
rush_0012–6-0.0633%16 Oct →
mirage4–130.0132%16 Oct →
mirage6–130.0512%16 Oct →
mirage11–130.0315%16 Oct →
mirage13–110.0511%14 Oct →
nuke13–00.0619%14 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.