HaugeN

HaugeN — CS2 Stats

NO76561197993138650[U:1:32872922]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,227Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
12,006Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 4,227 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 14 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,636 +942 15 Feb29 Jun · 24 days played
26,49928,781peak 28,78115 Feb29 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,763 +0 9 Sept22 Sept · 3 observations
2,7632,763peak 2,7639 Sept22 Sept
28,965Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,763Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-02-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,763
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 237 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches8
Win rate38%
K/D1.38
Headshot %43%

Measured 28 Aug 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHaugeNPEAK ELO2,763csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning69
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49483Last 10049%Win rateWLLLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · −82ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 464ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 467ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility3.3
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 67% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 67% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning6.9
Utility3.3
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time506ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 543ms → last ⅓ avg 506ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–11 · ancient, 13 Mar
83%Best headshot accuracy · 4–1 · mirage, 17 Feb
344msFastest reaction time · 4–1 · mirage, 17 Feb
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 29 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
1310In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 78% over 9mirageWeakest map · 23% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2251723%-0.01
ancientB189950%0.01
dust2A1810856%0.00
nukeA149564%0.03
overpassB115645%0.02
cacheS97278%0.02
infernoB63350%0.02
anubis21150%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

447,830Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
11,336Matches
49.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
40.1%Headshot %
19.1%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of tracked players
37,266MVPs
8,694Hours (in match)
17,260Bombs planted
4,218Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47140,384
AWP125,646
Glock-1814,101
P2509,931
Knife6,880
SSG 085,289
FAMAS2,904

Lifetime map wins

18,392inferno
17,710dust2
15,905nuke
10,631train
6,363cbble
2,464vertigo
215office
121dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,709Matches
51%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
82.6ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient24351%1.2618.1
Mirage23846%1.2118.0
Nuke20158%1.2917.6
Dust220152%1.2918.0
Anubis13547%1.1918.0
Inferno7643%1.1117.0
Train7260%1.2717.9
Overpass5357%1.1715.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy
40.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
50.6%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
501msReaction time
36.1%T opening success
67.1%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
10.30HE damage / grenade
1.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4409 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.1165% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–70.0924%18 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0138%16 Aug
cache11–130.0223%16 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0418%1 Aug
inferno16–120.0718%27 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0129%27 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0133%26 Jul
inferno10–130.0427%24 Jul
nuke11–130.0529%24 Jul
cache13–20.0322%24 Jul
cache13–70.0730%17 Jul
ancient13–70.0324%13 Jul
dust210–130.067%13 Jul
cache13–70.0523%2 Jul
overpass13–80.1024%29 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0239%29 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0210%20 Jun
nuke13–30.0518%13 Jun
overpass13–100.0426%13 Jun
dust26–13-0.0422%13 Jun
dust213–90.0525%7 Jun
ancient16–140.0227%7 Jun
ancient19–17-0.0118%22 May
overpass4–130.0833%15 May
nuke15–150.0830%15 May
mirage13–11-0.016%2 May
ancient10–13-0.0016%2 May
nuke13–60.0322%2 May
cache13–11-0.0120%1 May
cache12–12-0.0418%1 May
cache13–8-0.0316%1 May
cache13–4-0.0317%1 May
mirage11–13-0.0315%29 Apr
overpass0–13-0.0912%29 Apr
dust213–110.0126%29 Apr
nuke13–70.0219%28 Apr
dust213–110.0418%28 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0421%26 Apr
ancient7–130.0619%24 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0113%23 Apr
dust213–50.0418%23 Apr
nuke13–100.1222%23 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0713%23 Apr
dust213–50.0523%21 Apr
ancient9–130.0110%18 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0129%18 Apr
nuke13–100.0417%18 Apr
overpass13–100.0717%17 Apr
ancient15–15-0.0413%17 Apr
mirage5–13-0.047%14 Apr
nuke13–90.0024%11 Apr
overpass13–16-0.0320%11 Apr
ancient13–110.0432%11 Apr
ancient14–160.0339%3 Apr
dust213–9-0.0123%3 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0519%3 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0314%3 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0823%3 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0915%3 Apr
dust213–110.0519%2 Apr
overpass13–60.0221%2 Apr
mirage13–100.0533%2 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0122%2 Apr
dust211–130.0325%29 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0415%29 Mar
ancient13–10.0022%29 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0410%28 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0030%28 Mar
ancient11–130.0223%17 Mar
overpass13–5-0.0014%16 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0514%14 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0319%14 Mar
overpass9–130.0129%13 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0233%13 Mar
dust29–130.0022%13 Mar
anubis13–9-0.0112%13 Mar
ancient13–110.1227%13 Mar
dust25–13-0.0618%7 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0425%7 Mar
dust27–13-0.0727%7 Mar
dust214–16-0.0311%6 Mar
mirage13–70.0336%6 Mar
nuke13–20.0115%6 Mar
overpass13–16-0.0118%21 Feb
inferno6–130.0222%21 Feb
inferno13–16-0.0220%18 Feb
dust216–14-0.0023%18 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0115%17 Feb
overpass8–130.0011%17 Feb
dust20–13-0.0623%17 Feb
mirage4–10.0983%17 Feb
ancient13–80.0817%16 Feb
dust213–8-0.0018%16 Feb
inferno13–40.0415%15 Feb
nuke13–30.0526%15 Feb
mirage9–130.0422%15 Feb
dust213–110.0018%15 Feb
nuke13–60.0512%15 Feb
mirage7–130.0644%15 Feb
mirage11–130.0034%14 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2.5K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →