jEWLEN

jEWLEN — CS2 Stats

76561197992957825[U:1:32692097]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

911Tracked matches50%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,860Top 50% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#87930 of 257841 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,081 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+549Premier CS Rating · 19,311 → 19,860

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,860 -4,333 6 Sept – 27 Oct · 28 days played
19,31124,193peak 24,1936 Sept27 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,081 +0 6 Sept – 24 Sept · 4 observations
1,0811,081peak 1,0816 Sept24 Sept
24,193Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,081Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-09-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,081
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 120 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,333 below peak (24,193)
  • -1,976 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 140 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjEWLENFACEITLevel 7 · 1,081 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,860 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,081csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning60
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateWLLLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −9.3pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility6.5
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 39% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning6.0
Utility6.5
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time502ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 534ms → last ⅓ avg 502ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–4 · debris, 18 Oct →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 8–0 · nuke, 21 Sept →
352msFastest reaction time · 8–8 · inferno, 7 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 14 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
11–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 69% over 16anubisWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2213–959%0.01
infernoS1611–569%0.02
mirageC167–944%-0.01
dust2D144–1029%-0.02
nukeB137–654%-0.01
ancientD102–820%0.00
anubisD81–713%-0.02
debris—11–0100%0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

459Matches
54%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
73.8ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1275%1.0513.9
Nuke1164%1.3215.7
Inferno1060%0.8511.6
Cache1080%1.1113.8
Ancient850%1.0716.4
Mirage771%1.0615.1
Dust2683%1.3914.8
Vertigo250%0.669.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
71.0%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
498msReaction time
57.6%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
13.17HE damage / grenade
12.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.1547% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–40.062%27 Oct →
dust210–13-0.077%26 Oct →
dust210–130.0115%26 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0411%26 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0314%23 Oct →
cache13–110.0216%23 Oct →
inferno13–100.0415%23 Oct →
inferno9–70.0843%23 Oct →
cache13–110.0317%23 Oct →
inferno13–30.055%23 Oct →
ancient6–130.0342%23 Oct →
anubis11–130.0119%19 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0137%19 Oct →
cache13–60.0918%19 Oct →
nuke13–110.038%19 Oct →
inferno4–00.0729%19 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0624%19 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0325%18 Oct →
debris9–40.1719%18 Oct →
nuke9–6-0.0118%18 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0223%18 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0316%18 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0030%17 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0011%17 Oct →
inferno16–130.0516%16 Oct →
ancient13–100.0717%16 Oct →
cache9–130.0723%16 Oct →
inferno13–40.0327%15 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0427%15 Oct →
nuke13–110.0020%15 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0518%15 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0328%15 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0620%14 Oct →
dust24–13-0.1020%14 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0021%14 Oct →
ancient13–10.0115%14 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.036%14 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0629%14 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0411%13 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0515%13 Oct →
mirage13–100.0628%13 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0511%13 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0515%11 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0119%11 Oct →
cache6–130.0342%11 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0228%11 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.055%9 Oct →
nuke4–130.0416%8 Oct →
anubis15–150.0122%7 Oct →
cache13–100.0319%7 Oct →
nuke13–60.0131%7 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0347%7 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0629%7 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0318%5 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0427%5 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0715%5 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0526%5 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0524%5 Oct →
ancient6–130.0620%5 Oct →
dust213–70.0418%30 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0423%30 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.0121%30 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0122%30 Sept →
cache13–80.0315%30 Sept →
cache16–120.0422%29 Sept →
inferno13–30.0724%29 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0418%29 Sept →
nuke10–130.0323%29 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0315%28 Sept →
mirage8–130.0113%28 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0318%28 Sept →
cache13–80.0229%28 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0217%28 Sept →
mirage16–130.0116%27 Sept →
cache13–70.0020%27 Sept →
ancient6–130.0510%25 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0220%24 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0317%24 Sept →
dust213–100.0624%24 Sept →
mirage8–130.0526%24 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0318%24 Sept →
cache3–130.0121%24 Sept →
inferno13–80.0621%23 Sept →
cache13–110.0616%23 Sept →
mirage10–130.0627%23 Sept →
dust210–130.0218%23 Sept →
mirage13–10.0213%23 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0719%23 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0121%22 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0227%22 Sept →
cache13–70.0433%21 Sept →
nuke8–00.0556%21 Sept →
inferno6–130.0526%21 Sept →
nuke12–16-0.0424%21 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0021%21 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0215%19 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0214%19 Sept →
cache10–13-0.029%19 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0614%19 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0817%18 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.