.҂𝕤𝕟𝕖[ⱥ]✘ — CS2 Stats

DE76561197987957662[U:1:27691934]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,083Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport

Premier CS Rating9,780Light Blue band · top ~55.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#166967 of 232221 tracked

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 15 days played since 5 Sep 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,780 +150 16 Sept – 18 Sept · 3 days played

10,104Peak Premier in tracked matches

15Days played since 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

103 below peak (9,883)
Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 220 to go
Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66

Positioning37

Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38–54–8Last 10038%Win rateWWWWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · +39ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

5–0 · 100% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

6–4 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

11–8–1 · 55% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 576ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.6

Utility4.7

Positioning3.7

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6

Positioning3.7

Utility4.7

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels1.7

Win Impact7.4

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time573ms+14ms

first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms

Headshot accuracy16.5%−0.4%

first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 11 Sept →

30%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · dust2, 8 Sept →

344msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 12 Sept →

13–1Biggest win · ancient, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

W5Current streak

10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 43% over 7dust2Weakest map · 36% over 56

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	56	20–36	36%	-0.04
cache	C	17	7–10	41%	-0.02
inferno	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.04
anubis	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.03
ancient	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.04
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.03
nuke	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.03
mirage	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 56). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

169Matches

47%Win rate

0.79Avg K/D

62.7ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	4	50%	0.93	11.0
Dust2	3	67%	0.48	10.3
Anubis	1	0%	1.00	15.0
Ancient	1	100%	1.38	11.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy

30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.7%Spray accuracy

79.4%Counter-strafing

7.3°Preaim

582msReaction time

43.2%T opening success

30.6%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

1.3%Flash assists

7.89HE damage / grenade

6.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 30.5914% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 56 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
overpass	13–6	-0.05	11%	19 Sept →
cache	13–8	-0.01	10%	19 Sept →
ancient	13–1	0.06	11%	19 Sept →
overpass	13–11	0.00	19%	19 Sept →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	26%	19 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	11%	19 Sept →
dust2	13–6	-0.05	7%	18 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	23%	18 Sept →
dust2	11–13	-0.09	15%	18 Sept →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	14%	18 Sept →
inferno	13–4	0.02	26%	18 Sept →
cache	13–8	-0.02	0%	18 Sept →
nuke	11–13	0.00	23%	18 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.09	18%	18 Sept →
dust2	12–12	-0.08	14%	17 Sept →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	16%	17 Sept →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	13%	17 Sept →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	12%	17 Sept →
inferno	13–4	-0.03	15%	17 Sept →
dust2	13–4	0.04	17%	17 Sept →
dust2	12–12	-0.06	20%	16 Sept →
dust2	13–9	-0.05	8%	16 Sept →
cache	13–9	-0.00	16%	16 Sept →
dust2	13–1	0.00	19%	16 Sept →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	24%	16 Sept →
anubis	13–11	0.06	24%	15 Sept →
dust2	10–13	0.03	28%	15 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	8%	15 Sept →
dust2	13–10	-0.07	18%	15 Sept →
cache	5–13	-0.05	16%	15 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.00	25%	15 Sept →
dust2	12–12	0.01	25%	14 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	10%	14 Sept →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	23%	14 Sept →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	17%	14 Sept →
cache	13–8	-0.01	13%	14 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.00	16%	14 Sept →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	27%	13 Sept →
dust2	13–8	-0.06	22%	13 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.10	19%	13 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	15%	13 Sept →
anubis	5–13	-0.08	18%	12 Sept →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	10%	12 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	12%	12 Sept →
anubis	13–3	-0.01	24%	12 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.09	16%	12 Sept →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	0%	12 Sept →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	0%	12 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	21%	12 Sept →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	19%	12 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.08	4%	12 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	15%	11 Sept →
dust2	13–4	0.01	20%	11 Sept →
cache	12–12	-0.02	11%	11 Sept →
dust2	13–2	0.13	19%	11 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.10	11%	11 Sept →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	29%	11 Sept →
cache	11–13	-0.02	15%	11 Sept →
anubis	3–13	-0.07	0%	11 Sept →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	11%	11 Sept →
dust2	11–0	0.01	15%	11 Sept →
ancient	7–13	-0.09	6%	10 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.08	17%	10 Sept →
cache	5–13	-0.01	15%	10 Sept →
anubis	13–2	-0.02	19%	10 Sept →
cache	13–6	0.02	14%	10 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	5%	10 Sept →
dust2	12–12	-0.05	15%	10 Sept →
dust2	13–4	0.00	18%	9 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.03	16%	9 Sept →
dust2	12–12	0.04	17%	9 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.05	19%	9 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.01	11%	9 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	16%	8 Sept →
cache	5–13	-0.07	8%	8 Sept →
anubis	8–13	-0.10	16%	8 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	27%	8 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.09	17%	8 Sept →
dust2	6–13	-0.08	8%	8 Sept →
dust2	13–5	0.00	6%	8 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	30%	8 Sept →
dust2	13–10	-0.07	27%	7 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.08	10%	7 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	27%	7 Sept →
mirage	12–12	-0.03	22%	7 Sept →
inferno	13–5	-0.05	21%	7 Sept →
cache	13–11	-0.07	9%	7 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.02	15%	7 Sept →
cache	5–13	-0.10	30%	6 Sept →
nuke	8–13	-0.06	8%	6 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.08	22%	6 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	20%	6 Sept →
cache	7–6	0.05	16%	6 Sept →
cache	6–13	0.02	26%	6 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	17%	6 Sept →
inferno	8–13	-0.10	0%	5 Sept →
cache	12–12	0.02	3%	5 Sept →
dust2	13–3	0.03	28%	5 Sept →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	7%	5 Sept →
dust2	7–13	0.05	23%	5 Sept →