XüF

XüF — CS2 Stats

DE76561197969727765[U:1:9462037]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

575Tracked matches32%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 29 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,751 +752 28 Jun5 Jul · 4 days played
14,99915,751peak 15,75128 Jun5 Jul
15,860Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-05-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGXüFFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning35
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44497Last 10044%Win rateLWLLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +6.9pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+4 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility3.8
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch8.0

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning3.5
Utility3.8
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time572ms−103ms
first ⅓ avg 675ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–5 · overpass, 28 Jun
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · dust2, 10 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · anubis, 4 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 28 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
62In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 10infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B34161847%-0.01
cacheB1991047%-0.04
ancientD113827%-0.01
mirageA106460%-0.01
anubisA95456%-0.01
infernoD71614%-0.01
nukeD62433%0.00
overpass32167%-0.01
vertigo1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

88Matches
56%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
79.7ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

60%1v1 clutch win
50%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1560%1.2316.4
Vertigo1164%1.2417.2
Mirage850%1.3517.4
Anubis743%1.1915.7
Nuke560%1.0514.0
Ancient367%1.0815.3
Overpass10%1.1820.0
Cache1100%0.7213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.4%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
568msReaction time
37.8%T opening success
26.4%CT opening success
0.27Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
11.53HE damage / grenade
3.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2723 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.7624% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0313%14 Sept
dust213–110.0117%14 Sept
dust27–130.0026%13 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0333%12 Sept
inferno10–130.0117%12 Sept
dust25–13-0.0317%12 Sept
anubis13–3-0.0117%12 Sept
dust25–13-0.0510%12 Sept
dust213–80.0038%10 Sept
mirage13–3-0.078%10 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0126%10 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0520%8 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0811%7 Sept
dust213–5-0.0311%7 Sept
vertigo1–13-0.086%7 Sept
overpass5–13-0.097%7 Sept
dust25–13-0.0321%6 Sept
cache7–6-0.0413%6 Sept
cache6–13-0.0710%6 Sept
ancient7–13-0.054%6 Sept
nuke13–60.0521%6 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0217%5 Sept
cache12–12-0.0226%5 Sept
dust213–3-0.0520%5 Sept
dust24–13-0.0126%5 Sept
ancient12–12-0.057%4 Sept
cache9–13-0.1013%4 Sept
anubis13–3-0.0216%4 Sept
dust28–13-0.0724%3 Sept
cache8–13-0.0133%1 Sept
dust213–4-0.0012%1 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0331%1 Sept
dust24–13-0.0828%16 Aug
dust22–8-0.0322%16 Aug
mirage7–13-0.1018%16 Aug
dust213–30.0017%16 Aug
cache13–7-0.0716%16 Aug
mirage13–50.0418%16 Aug
ancient5–130.047%13 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0015%13 Jul
ancient12–20.0224%10 Jul
mirage13–70.0032%6 Jul
cache13–110.0029%5 Jul
dust212–160.0412%5 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0413%5 Jul
cache6–13-0.0510%1 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0323%1 Jul
nuke8–130.0332%1 Jul
overpass13–6-0.0610%1 Jul
ancient15–15-0.029%30 Jun
mirage16–130.0815%30 Jun
dust25–13-0.0216%29 Jun
dust210–13-0.0631%29 Jun
dust213–80.0119%29 Jun
dust213–100.0213%28 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0213%28 Jun
mirage13–00.0220%28 Jun
nuke13–40.028%28 Jun
inferno15–150.0422%28 Jun
anubis13–50.0418%28 Jun
cache13–80.0621%28 Jun
overpass13–50.1128%28 Jun
ancient13–100.0220%28 Jun
cache13–6-0.0419%27 Jun
ancient10–13-0.039%27 Jun
cache6–13-0.043%21 Jun
cache13–8-0.062%21 Jun
dust210–130.0922%21 Jun
nuke15–15-0.0832%18 Jun
inferno5–9-0.0713%18 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0211%18 Jun
dust213–10-0.0416%12 Jun
dust211–13-0.029%12 Jun
anubis11–130.029%12 Jun
cache5–13-0.0122%12 Jun
mirage3–13-0.058%12 Jun
mirage9–130.0015%12 Jun
dust24–13-0.0618%9 Jun
dust210–130.0614%9 Jun
cache13–9-0.0720%9 Jun
cache0–3-0.100%9 Jun
dust210–13-0.0315%8 Jun
dust213–11-0.0416%8 Jun
dust210–13-0.0712%8 Jun
mirage13–11-0.027%5 Jun
cache12–12-0.079%5 Jun
dust213–6-0.0210%1 Jun
anubis13–100.0114%1 Jun
dust213–90.0622%31 May
nuke12–120.019%31 May
cache8–130.0314%31 May
ancient6–130.0214%31 May
cache13–6-0.0227%31 May
anubis13–20.0114%31 May
dust23–1-0.0033%31 May
dust213–50.1023%30 May
cache13–90.0216%30 May
ancient6–13-0.048%30 May
dust213–00.0213%30 May
dust213–8-0.048%29 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →