FRWR

FRWR — CS2 Stats

ES76561197987295623[U:1:27029895]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

866Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,293Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating26,453Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8859 of 220319 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 866 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 28 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,453 +3,444 28 Jun9 Sept · 23 days played
21,73026,453peak 26,45328 Jun9 Sept
26,476Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-06-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,453
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,547 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate41.0%46.8%48.3%7.3% short
Shot accuracy14.1%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.091.061.07meets
Match win rate50.3%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFRWRFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER26,453 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning60
Utility79

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62362Last 10062%Win rateWWLLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +6.9pp headshot accuracy · −56ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 20

  • 1451 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility7.9
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch2.6

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 79 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning6.0
Utility7.9
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time606ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 9 Jul
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · inferno, 1 Jul
422msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 5 Jul
13–0Biggest win · cache, 10 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 22mirageWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S30201067%0.04
ancientS2216673%0.02
infernoB1910953%0.02
nukeA116555%0.02
anubisA85363%0.04
mirageD62433%0.01
cache43175%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

92,750Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
5,186Matches
50.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
41.0%Headshot %
14.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
11,215MVPs
2,293Hours (in match)
6,310Bombs planted
1,488Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,962
AWP16,615
SSG 085,277
P903,223
HE Grenade2,533
MP72,207

Lifetime map wins

19,686dust2
9,868inferno
2,448cbble
969train
760vertigo
672nuke
238office
120assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

288Matches
57%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
90.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21953%1.0416.5
Anubis1369%1.4616.7
Inferno1164%1.5020.0
Mirage1050%0.9814.9
Ancient367%1.5218.3
Vertigo367%1.0610.0
Train250%1.2824.5
Nuke10%0.6111.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
609msReaction time
39.6%T opening success
58.1%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
15.77HE damage / grenade
17.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.5694% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust216–120.0629%8 Aug
ancient13–110.0117%6 Aug
mirage2–130.0116%4 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0525%31 Jul
ancient13–80.0311%31 Jul
dust213–80.0426%31 Jul
dust213–50.1313%30 Jul
inferno13–70.0418%29 Jul
dust213–60.1227%29 Jul
ancient13–40.0339%29 Jul
nuke13–60.1413%29 Jul
dust213–80.0321%29 Jul
anubis15–150.0612%28 Jul
mirage17–19-0.0110%28 Jul
nuke13–110.0115%23 Jul
dust213–90.1315%22 Jul
nuke13–90.0718%22 Jul
dust29–13-0.0315%22 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0210%22 Jul
mirage16–140.0424%21 Jul
nuke8–130.0120%21 Jul
inferno11–130.0423%20 Jul
inferno11–50.0132%20 Jul
dust213–3-0.0242%20 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0724%20 Jul
dust213–20.1119%20 Jul
ancient13–100.0314%20 Jul
cache13–90.0421%18 Jul
ancient11–130.0313%17 Jul
ancient13–80.0414%17 Jul
dust29–13-0.0319%17 Jul
inferno10–130.0814%17 Jul
ancient13–10.070%17 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0323%16 Jul
ancient14–160.019%16 Jul
anubis13–30.0829%16 Jul
mirage7–130.0114%15 Jul
nuke13–100.0120%15 Jul
dust210–130.0124%14 Jul
dust213–20.0215%14 Jul
ancient13–90.0423%14 Jul
ancient13–60.0722%13 Jul
dust29–130.0214%13 Jul
inferno15–150.0119%11 Jul
cache13–00.1838%10 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0629%10 Jul
dust213–80.0613%10 Jul
dust212–160.0633%9 Jul
nuke8–130.0111%9 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0325%9 Jul
dust213–70.2024%9 Jul
cache8–130.0231%7 Jul
cache13–70.1223%6 Jul
dust213–11-0.0013%6 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0219%6 Jul
dust23–2-0.0130%6 Jul
inferno13–20.1213%6 Jul
inferno13–60.0611%6 Jul
ancient8–10.0233%6 Jul
inferno13–40.1133%6 Jul
inferno13–30.0413%5 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0135%5 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0518%5 Jul
dust27–130.0016%5 Jul
ancient13–100.0120%5 Jul
dust213–60.0730%5 Jul
dust27–13-0.0216%3 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0220%3 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0415%3 Jul
dust26–130.0324%3 Jul
inferno16–130.0314%3 Jul
anubis7–130.0317%3 Jul
ancient13–60.0516%2 Jul
ancient0–13-0.0214%2 Jul
dust213–60.0324%2 Jul
anubis13–90.0422%2 Jul
ancient10–30.0922%2 Jul
mirage9–13-0.067%2 Jul
dust213–7-0.0320%2 Jul
inferno7–130.0022%2 Jul
ancient13–60.0713%2 Jul
dust211–130.0518%1 Jul
ancient13–90.0215%1 Jul
inferno13–90.0744%1 Jul
dust213–110.1218%1 Jul
ancient16–120.0315%1 Jul
dust213–30.0323%30 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0629%29 Jun
inferno13–100.0124%29 Jun
mirage13–40.0828%29 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0011%29 Jun
dust213–100.0915%29 Jun
dust26–13-0.0426%29 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0120%28 Jun
anubis13–50.1229%28 Jun
dust213–90.0120%28 Jun
ancient13–80.0111%28 Jun
nuke9–13-0.069%28 Jun
nuke8–00.1140%28 Jun
anubis13–80.0114%28 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →