t r a i n s

t r a i n s — CS2 Stats

CA76561197985270821[U:1:25005093]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,061Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,972Hours in CS39Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating11,444Blue band · top ~47.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2 · 808 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−176Premier CS Rating · 11,620 → 11,444
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 16 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,444 -1,081 16 Jul22 Sept · 27 days played
9,78713,343peak 13,34316 Jul22 Sept
13,343Peak Premier in tracked matches
808Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-07-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 808
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 93 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,899 below peak (13,343)
  • +1,338 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,556 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,544), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate42.2%41.3%41.9%meets
Shot accuracy8.2%12.7%12.2%4.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.910.950.980.07 short
Match win rate40.8%42.5%43.3%2.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGt r a i n sFACEITLevel 2 · 808 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER11,444 · Blue bandPEAK ELO808csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning46
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44515Last 10044%Win rateWLLTWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.9pp headshot accuracy · +43ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 720ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 642ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim4.6
Utility6.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch5.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning4.6
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact6.2

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time612ms−80ms
first ⅓ avg 691ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy13.5%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 13.5% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–8 · inferno, 9 Aug
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · cache, 2 Aug
477msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 16 Sept
13–1Biggest win · cache, 14 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 15nukeWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C26111542%-0.02
ancientC167944%0.01
infernoS1510567%0.01
cacheC135838%-0.02
mirageC104640%-0.03
nukeD92722%-0.02
anubisD82625%-0.06
overpass220100%-0.03
train110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,512Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
3,098Matches
40.8%Match win rate
42.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
8.2%Shot accuracy
4,956MVPs
1,452Hours (in match)
3,980Bombs planted
807Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,702
MP93,121
MAC-102,081
FAMAS1,724
XM10141,238
P2501,111

Lifetime map wins

7,749dust2
6,034inferno
1,684nuke
608train
385vertigo
207office
121cbble
68assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

128Matches
41%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
70.8ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2143%1.0715.2
Anubis2035%0.9414.2
Dust22055%0.9013.7
Inferno1844%1.0116.2
Nuke1547%0.7913.6
Mirage1127%0.8011.6
Cache729%0.7311.6
Overpass667%0.9815.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
73.8%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
610msReaction time
20.5%T opening success
45.0%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
6.22HE damage / grenade
17.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.12° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.0869% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.0016%22 Sept
anubis4–13-0.1111%22 Sept
cache8–13-0.0512%22 Sept
ancient15–150.0721%17 Sept
dust213–11-0.0113%17 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0020%16 Sept
ancient13–70.038%14 Sept
cache13–10.0414%14 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0310%11 Sept
inferno7–130.0017%11 Sept
cache7–13-0.066%9 Sept
dust28–13-0.045%9 Sept
inferno13–70.0319%9 Sept
dust213–8-0.075%9 Sept
inferno13–80.039%9 Sept
dust25–13-0.0416%9 Sept
dust210–13-0.0210%8 Sept
cache13–40.0415%8 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0719%8 Sept
anubis4–13-0.078%4 Sept
anubis15–15-0.0716%2 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0315%2 Sept
ancient13–100.0017%2 Sept
dust213–8-0.0421%2 Sept
dust213–50.0516%2 Sept
cache8–13-0.0217%2 Sept
ancient13–110.058%2 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0314%1 Sept
dust211–130.037%1 Sept
overpass13–11-0.056%1 Sept
ancient13–110.029%1 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0314%1 Sept
inferno9–10.0231%1 Sept
ancient10–130.0613%31 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0211%31 Aug
dust213–8-0.0212%31 Aug
dust27–13-0.0811%30 Aug
train13–40.0115%26 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0411%26 Aug
overpass13–10.0017%26 Aug
dust213–9-0.0015%20 Aug
ancient6–130.059%20 Aug
dust213–100.0118%20 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0222%15 Aug
dust26–13-0.0113%15 Aug
inferno13–70.0330%14 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0523%14 Aug
cache9–13-0.075%14 Aug
ancient13–70.0124%14 Aug
dust214–16-0.0322%13 Aug
cache13–9-0.0025%13 Aug
inferno19–17-0.0515%13 Aug
dust213–10-0.0115%13 Aug
ancient13–70.028%13 Aug
inferno13–40.0611%13 Aug
mirage11–130.0021%12 Aug
mirage2–13-0.1211%12 Aug
dust213–5-0.0014%12 Aug
dust28–13-0.0614%12 Aug
mirage10–130.0211%12 Aug
mirage13–100.039%11 Aug
cache11–13-0.0028%11 Aug
anubis9–13-0.087%11 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0311%11 Aug
cache9–130.0318%11 Aug
ancient7–130.0113%9 Aug
anubis11–13-0.069%9 Aug
inferno13–80.0913%9 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0017%9 Aug
inferno13–16-0.029%8 Aug
inferno13–60.0410%8 Aug
cache4–13-0.0922%8 Aug
cache6–13-0.056%8 Aug
dust24–13-0.0913%7 Aug
dust21–13-0.0420%7 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0616%7 Aug
dust29–13-0.0013%7 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0521%6 Aug
dust210–130.0217%6 Aug
nuke8–130.0022%5 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0515%5 Aug
dust213–60.0517%4 Aug
cache13–11-0.0631%2 Aug
dust215–15-0.0615%31 Jul
anubis13–6-0.029%31 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0213%30 Jul
mirage7–13-0.046%30 Jul
cache13–2-0.0111%30 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0411%30 Jul
dust27–13-0.013%29 Jul
dust215–15-0.0111%23 Jul
nuke12–120.0115%23 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0412%21 Jul
nuke6–13-0.049%21 Jul
nuke9–13-0.048%21 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0621%20 Jul
anubis16–14-0.047%20 Jul
inferno13–50.038%16 Jul
nuke13–20.0218%16 Jul
mirage16–13-0.047%16 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →