Schuster

Schuster — CS2 Stats

SE76561197984358650[U:1:24092922]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

639Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating27,796Top 5% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3580 of 261676 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Nov 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 639 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,796 +1,926 28 Nov – 11 Nov · 25 days played
22,42827,796peak 27,79628 Nov11 Nov
27,796Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,345Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2025-11-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 27,796
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,204 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSchusterFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER27,796 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,345csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning68
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–37–3Last 10060%Win rateWLLLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.5pp headshot accuracy · −94ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility6.8
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.8
Utility6.8
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time573ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy22.4%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 8 Apr →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 15–15 · dust2, 29 Apr →
445msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 3 May →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 2 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 86% over 7anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2820–871%0.02
dust2B2713–1448%0.03
mirageA2113–862%0.01
cacheS76–186%0.02
anubisD50–50%-0.02
overpassD51–420%-0.01
inferno—44–0100%0.03
train—33–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

676Matches
63%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
83.0ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
40Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23868%1.2117.1
Ancient3861%1.3215.6
Mirage2339%1.0215.9
Inferno1681%1.1717.4
Cache1573%1.0413.7
Anubis1560%1.1616.2
Overpass520%0.8915.6
Nuke425%0.7613.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
41.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.9%Spray accuracy
86.1%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
574msReaction time
34.8%T opening success
53.8%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
12.57HE damage / grenade
13.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.7617% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–50.0725%5 Oct →
dust210–130.0120%9 Sept →
dust211–130.0317%7 Sept →
anubis6–130.0221%29 Aug →
inferno13–70.0218%29 Aug →
ancient13–40.0520%29 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0026%28 Aug →
ancient13–50.1321%28 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0312%25 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0624%25 Aug →
cache13–110.0021%2 Aug →
ancient13–110.0325%23 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0419%23 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0629%20 Jul →
dust213–110.0831%20 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0236%19 Jul →
dust213–110.0217%19 Jul →
mirage22–190.0220%19 Jul →
ancient1–12-0.0317%7 Jul →
cache13–70.0636%7 Jul →
ancient13–100.1025%18 Jun →
mirage11–130.0121%18 Jun →
dust216–130.0421%18 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.0324%18 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0619%18 Jun →
dust26–20.1117%17 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0016%17 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0720%17 Jun →
mirage13–50.0418%16 Jun →
dust213–50.0624%16 Jun →
ancient16–140.0218%16 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0231%15 Jun →
ancient13–80.0332%15 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0125%7 Jun →
inferno16–130.0427%7 Jun →
ancient13–90.0634%2 Jun →
anubis10–130.0113%2 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0322%2 Jun →
ancient13–80.0011%15 May →
mirage13–70.0722%15 May →
ancient13–70.0310%15 May →
mirage13–5-0.0520%15 May →
dust26–13-0.0125%15 May →
inferno13–60.0029%13 May →
dust26–13-0.0413%13 May →
mirage13–110.0930%13 May →
dust213–90.0532%13 May →
anubis3–13-0.0229%13 May →
mirage13–90.0833%3 May →
ancient13–60.0924%3 May →
dust213–70.0437%3 May →
overpass13–50.1111%3 May →
dust213–40.0925%2 May →
dust27–130.0716%2 May →
inferno13–20.0524%2 May →
ancient13–80.0917%1 May →
mirage14–16-0.0214%1 May →
dust211–130.0625%1 May →
mirage9–130.0017%1 May →
ancient3–13-0.0811%1 May →
dust213–80.0232%30 Apr →
mirage13–4-0.0327%30 Apr →
cache13–70.0225%30 Apr →
ancient13–100.0514%30 Apr →
mirage13–80.0814%30 Apr →
mirage13–80.0723%29 Apr →
dust215–150.0141%29 Apr →
cache13–40.0115%28 Apr →
ancient13–40.0225%21 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0221%19 Apr →
overpass4–13-0.0329%19 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0521%12 Apr →
overpass4–13-0.0220%12 Apr →
mirage13–60.0228%12 Apr →
dust213–60.1521%8 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0310%8 Apr →
ancient13–80.0419%8 Apr →
ancient15–15-0.0318%8 Apr →
dust27–130.0330%6 Apr →
anubis4–13-0.0512%6 Apr →
ancient13–40.0418%31 Mar →
mirage15–150.0518%30 Mar →
ancient13–20.0629%30 Mar →
mirage13–4-0.0022%30 Mar →
dust213–2-0.087%30 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0420%30 Mar →
dust27–130.0318%24 Mar →
ancient13–5-0.0116%18 Jan →
train13–40.1026%3 Dec →
train13–6-0.0120%3 Dec →
train13–70.0527%3 Dec →
ancient3–130.0326%2 Dec →
overpass1–13-0.120%2 Dec →
mirage13–50.0323%1 Dec →
overpass14–16-0.0118%30 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0131%30 Nov →
ancient13–40.0222%30 Nov →
ancient11–13-0.0415%30 Nov →
dust213–100.0818%28 Nov →
ancient13–80.0328%28 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.