Mörkö

Mörkö — CS2 Stats

FI76561197984358422[U:1:24092694]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

477Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,859Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,068 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,859 -929 27 Jul – 2 Nov · 41 days played
17,44720,811peak 20,81127 Jul2 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,068 +0 1 Sept – 29 Oct · 4 observations
1,0681,068peak 1,0681 Sept29 Oct
20,864Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,068Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-07-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,068
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 133 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,952 below peak (20,811)
  • -150 over 30 days · steady
  • -1,155 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,141 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMörköFACEITLevel 5 · 1,068 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,859 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,068csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning67
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateWLLWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility3.5
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning6.7
Utility3.5
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time544ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 9 Oct →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · dust2, 11 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 9 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 17mirageWeakest map · 29% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD216–1529%-0.02
ancientS1712–571%-0.00
cacheC177–1041%-0.03
nukeA1710–759%-0.01
dust2C146–843%-0.02
infernoC125–742%-0.01
anubis—21–150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 21). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

100Matches
53%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
71.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage250%0.9414.0
Inferno1100%0.9313.0
Nuke10%1.6221.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
27.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.7%Spray accuracy
70.3%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
547msReaction time
43.1%T opening success
54.4%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
10.28HE damage / grenade
1.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3966 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–6-0.0517%2 Nov →
dust23–13-0.0517%30 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0118%30 Oct →
cache13–90.0221%30 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0515%29 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0020%29 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0212%28 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0116%28 Oct →
cache13–11-0.048%26 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0431%26 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0521%25 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.042%25 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0219%25 Oct →
ancient13–30.1128%24 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0112%24 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0312%23 Oct →
ancient13–50.1122%23 Oct →
mirage13–100.0516%23 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0418%23 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0418%22 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0724%21 Oct →
ancient13–80.0112%21 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0222%21 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0429%21 Oct →
mirage13–80.0016%21 Oct →
cache10–130.0321%19 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0117%19 Oct →
mirage11–130.0114%17 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0321%17 Oct →
inferno13–80.0627%16 Oct →
dust213–110.0224%16 Oct →
inferno11–130.0210%14 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0011%14 Oct →
cache9–2-0.060%14 Oct →
dust213–90.0717%12 Oct →
inferno13–80.0018%12 Oct →
ancient13–50.0323%12 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0544%11 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0716%11 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.058%10 Oct →
ancient12–16-0.0618%9 Oct →
nuke13–20.1228%9 Oct →
anubis8–130.0125%9 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0513%9 Oct →
nuke13–100.0418%9 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0215%9 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0223%9 Oct →
inferno13–60.0019%9 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.1031%9 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0722%8 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.0110%8 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0911%7 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0333%7 Oct →
mirage10–130.0417%6 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.058%6 Oct →
nuke11–130.0123%2 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0624%2 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0115%2 Oct →
nuke13–70.0214%2 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0519%1 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0218%1 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0020%30 Sept →
cache13–90.0236%29 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0413%29 Sept →
mirage9–130.0335%29 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0418%28 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0427%28 Sept →
anubis13–80.0717%26 Sept →
cache13–110.0326%26 Sept →
ancient11–130.0043%25 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0519%25 Sept →
mirage9–130.0126%25 Sept →
dust213–160.0429%25 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0432%21 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0326%21 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0222%21 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0428%18 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.136%30 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.069%30 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0222%29 Aug →
mirage13–50.0115%29 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.039%29 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0619%28 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0013%28 Aug →
ancient13–90.027%28 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0214%28 Aug →
nuke16–140.0019%27 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0420%27 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0521%27 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0117%6 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0511%6 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0318%5 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0038%5 Aug →
ancient13–50.0414%29 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.047%29 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0627%29 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0418%29 Jul →
cache9–130.0216%27 Jul →
dust28–130.0220%27 Jul →
ancient13–70.0426%27 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.