phell9n

phell9n — CS2 Stats

SE76561197983298632[U:1:23032904]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

720Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,070Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,519Purple band · top ~14.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#97670 of 239185 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 18,519 → 18,519
+2Tracked matches · now 720
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 13 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,519 -221 18 Mar16 Sept · 3 days played
18,51918,740peak 18,74018 Mar16 Sept
18,740Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-02-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 221 below peak (18,740)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,481 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-16
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2
Win rate100%
K/D1.06
Headshot %54%

Measured 16 Sep 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches11
Win rate64%
K/D0.90
Headshot %52%

Measured 28 Aug 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,045), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate50.3%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy18.9%12.0%12.5%above
Kill/death ratio0.941.021.030.10 short
Match win rate43.3%44.7%45.2%1.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGphell9nFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,519 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning44
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5149Last 10051%Win rateWWLWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.5pp headshot accuracy · −28ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility5.6
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning4.4
Utility5.6
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time578ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 23 Apr
33%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · nuke, 17 Mar
406msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · nuke, 15 Apr
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 23 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
912In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 65% over 23ancientWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA24141058%-0.02
dust2S2315865%-0.01
mirageB1991047%-0.03
ancientD134931%-0.02
nukeA85363%-0.02
cache41325%0.00
overpass41325%-0.02
anubis31233%-0.03
cache_b21150%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

67,725Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
2,902Matches
43.3%Match win rate
50.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
18.9%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 5 players
5,393MVPs
1,448Hours (in match)
3,149Bombs planted
671Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,404
AWP4,104
SG 5532,708
AUG2,507
FAMAS1,741

Lifetime map wins

6,884inferno
4,232dust2
1,616train
1,297nuke
494cbble
193vertigo
129lake
105shorttrain

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

936Matches
50%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
74.7%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
570msReaction time
20.5%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
10.03HE damage / grenade
8.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.5334% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno22–20-0.0217%21 Sept
mirage13–100.0124%21 Sept
cache13–16-0.0020%8 Sept
dust213–8-0.0323%8 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0512%8 Sept
dust213–70.0118%7 Sept
cache13–80.0321%7 Sept
inferno12–16-0.0517%7 Sept
dust213–80.0519%7 Sept
inferno22–20-0.0216%3 Sept
mirage9–13-0.027%3 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0223%18 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0512%18 Aug
cache14–16-0.0113%18 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0614%17 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0614%17 Aug
overpass7–13-0.049%17 Aug
dust213–90.0030%17 Aug
ancient4–13-0.016%11 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0625%11 Aug
dust214–16-0.0222%11 Aug
ancient7–130.0018%10 Aug
inferno13–110.0613%10 Aug
mirage7–130.0314%10 Aug
inferno13–30.0524%10 Aug
dust24–13-0.0124%23 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0214%23 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0221%23 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0316%22 May
overpass13–30.0921%22 May
nuke13–10-0.0312%22 May
dust213–3-0.0220%22 May
inferno11–13-0.0326%22 May
cache13–160.0027%22 May
dust213–8-0.0114%14 May
dust211–13-0.0315%12 May
inferno10–130.0318%12 May
mirage3–13-0.0913%12 May
dust213–10.1029%23 Apr
nuke9–130.0029%23 Apr
inferno13–30.1722%23 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0327%23 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0228%20 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0324%20 Apr
inferno2–9-0.1618%20 Apr
dust210–13-0.0216%15 Apr
dust213–10-0.0118%15 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0417%15 Apr
nuke5–13-0.1015%15 Apr
inferno8–13-0.1015%19 Mar
dust29–13-0.0515%19 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0419%19 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0730%19 Mar
inferno13–50.0730%18 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0133%17 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0228%17 Mar
overpass2–13-0.0927%17 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0418%13 Mar
ancient13–90.0116%13 Mar
dust22–13-0.0623%13 Mar
mirage2–13-0.1213%13 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0310%12 Mar
cache_b11–130.0016%12 Mar
inferno16–14-0.0316%12 Mar
inferno13–8-0.089%10 Mar
dust213–11-0.0917%10 Mar
nuke13–60.0217%10 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0319%10 Mar
mirage13–20.0518%10 Mar
anubis13–9-0.0129%4 Mar
ancient2–13-0.0431%4 Mar
mirage13–1-0.0411%4 Mar
inferno13–4-0.0315%3 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0121%3 Mar
ancient16–14-0.0217%3 Mar
dust213–90.0511%26 Feb
ancient20–22-0.0313%26 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0529%26 Feb
mirage16–19-0.0523%24 Feb
dust213–90.0120%24 Feb
cache_b13–90.0014%20 Feb
dust213–60.0330%20 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0813%20 Feb
dust211–13-0.0020%20 Feb
dust219–16-0.0324%20 Feb
ancient10–30.0315%19 Feb
inferno13–70.0210%19 Feb
anubis3–13-0.0616%19 Feb
inferno11–13-0.018%19 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0122%19 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0715%18 Feb
inferno13–60.0222%18 Feb
dust213–80.0318%18 Feb
mirage1–13-0.0810%17 Feb
dust213–11-0.0315%17 Feb
ancient5–130.0220%17 Feb
dust26–13-0.0219%16 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0321%16 Feb
inferno7–13-0.044%16 Feb
ancient16–19-0.0614%13 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →