J0nssi

J0nssi — CS2 Stats

FI76561197983264376[U:1:22998648]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

701Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,743Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,350Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#59374 of 232373 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,846 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 20 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,350 -127 20 Apr17 Sept · 23 days played
21,34824,163peak 24,16320 Apr17 Sept
24,251Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,846Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-04-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,846
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 155 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,813 below peak (24,163)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,650 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches1922−3
Win rate42%50%−8pp
K/D1.080.81+0.28
Headshot %47%47%+0pp

Measured 12 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,320), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.4%48.3%51.0%5.5% short
Shot accuracy13.9%13.2%13.7%meets
Kill/death ratio1.141.071.09above
Match win rate44.8%46.9%48.4%3.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJ0nssiFACEITLevel 9 · 1,846 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,350 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,846csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning53
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49474Last 10049%Win rateLWLLWLLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 271 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility7.2
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.3
Utility7.2
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time589ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 8 Jul
39%Best headshot accuracy · 9–4 · inferno, 15 Aug
469msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · anubis, 6 Sept
13–0Biggest win · cache, 29 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
47In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 62% over 13nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B27131448%-0.00
cacheB157847%0.03
infernoC156940%-0.00
anubisA138562%0.00
ancientA127558%0.02
nukeC83538%0.01
mirageC73443%-0.01
office110100%-0.01
train110100%0.00
overpass1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

119,877Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
5,146Matches
44.8%Match win rate
45.4%Headshot %
13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
12,417MVPs
2,227Hours (in match)
6,595Bombs planted
1,210Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4739,927
AWP15,416
P2504,341
FAMAS2,288
Tec-91,483

Lifetime map wins

13,319dust2
6,415inferno
3,500nuke
3,090train
1,439cbble
656vertigo
242aztec
218dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

865Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
79.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5652%1.1115.2
Dust24549%1.1116.9
Anubis4457%1.0216.3
Inferno3060%1.1015.0
Nuke2264%1.2016.3
Mirage2241%1.0215.0
Cache1540%0.9914.6
Overpass1242%0.9317.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
579msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
58.9%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
13.47HE damage / grenade
13.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.6545% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–130.0417%17 Sept
cache13–30.0829%17 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0717%14 Sept
nuke6–9-0.0214%13 Sept
inferno9–70.0713%13 Sept
inferno7–90.1128%13 Sept
cache6–130.0614%13 Sept
anubis15–150.0513%13 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0015%13 Sept
dust212–16-0.0324%11 Sept
cache13–60.1121%10 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0714%10 Sept
dust213–10-0.0013%9 Sept
office13–10-0.018%7 Sept
anubis13–100.0111%6 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0116%6 Sept
anubis8–130.0114%4 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0130%30 Aug
dust213–70.0630%30 Aug
anubis9–130.0317%30 Aug
cache8–130.0217%30 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0536%29 Aug
dust26–13-0.0122%29 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0715%28 Aug
anubis13–70.0515%27 Aug
ancient13–60.0818%26 Aug
dust213–8-0.0112%25 Aug
anubis13–40.0520%24 Aug
dust28–13-0.0329%23 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0213%23 Aug
cache14–160.0220%23 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0023%20 Aug
mirage16–120.0413%16 Aug
dust213–50.0818%16 Aug
cache7–13-0.0317%15 Aug
inferno9–40.0839%15 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1110%15 Aug
dust213–50.1729%8 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0019%4 Jul
dust216–130.0121%4 Jul
dust23–13-0.0223%2 Jul
dust213–110.0214%1 Jul
mirage13–100.0220%25 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0012%24 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0123%19 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0115%19 Jun
anubis5–13-0.079%19 Jun
ancient4–130.0718%17 Jun
anubis2–13-0.110%13 Jun
cache6–13-0.0519%9 Jun
cache13–80.0324%9 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0518%2 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0029%2 Jun
train13–60.0015%23 May
inferno13–70.0020%23 May
cache10–130.0619%22 May
cache13–40.0123%22 May
overpass6–13-0.0215%20 May
dust213–10-0.0526%20 May
ancient13–70.0219%19 May
cache13–50.0520%19 May
ancient13–10-0.0017%9 May
inferno13–110.0112%9 May
dust213–60.0333%8 May
cache13–50.0414%8 May
dust28–13-0.0423%2 May
ancient9–13-0.0214%2 May
dust24–13-0.0324%1 May
nuke3–13-0.078%1 May
mirage1–13-0.0931%1 May
ancient13–80.0916%1 May
dust213–10-0.0421%1 May
cache12–12-0.0325%1 May
dust25–13-0.0613%29 Apr
cache7–130.0320%29 Apr
cache13–00.1228%29 Apr
dust25–130.0124%29 Apr
nuke13–80.0420%29 Apr
dust215–15-0.0515%28 Apr
dust23–13-0.0325%28 Apr
dust26–13-0.0221%28 Apr
ancient16–120.0219%27 Apr
nuke16–120.0119%27 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0115%27 Apr
anubis13–80.0419%27 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0221%27 Apr
inferno13–10-0.049%27 Apr
dust213–10-0.0010%26 Apr
dust213–90.0019%25 Apr
nuke13–40.1318%24 Apr
mirage16–130.0415%21 Apr
ancient13–30.0013%21 Apr
dust27–13-0.058%21 Apr
dust216–120.0023%21 Apr
ancient13–80.0225%21 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0219%20 Apr
inferno13–80.0034%20 Apr
dust211–130.0310%20 Apr
anubis13–50.0524%20 Apr
inferno8–80.0218%20 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →