deathr0w — CS2 Stats

76561197982775338[U:1:22509610]Steam profile ↗

1,645Tracked matches77%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,658Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3562 of 21238 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,098 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77

Positioning52

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateWWWLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.7

Aggression6.0

Utility5.5

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels1.6

Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7

Positioning5.2

Utility5.5

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels1.6

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time610ms+32ms

first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms

Headshot accuracy23.3%+2.9%

first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — boulder 13–7

13–2Biggest win — boulder

9Longest win streak

W3Current streak

13–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 38% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	27	17–10	63%	0.00
nuke	C	16	6–10	38%	-0.02
anubis	B	15	8–7	53%	0.00
inferno	C	14	6–8	43%	-0.01
mirage	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.01
cache	S	6	4–2	67%	-0.01
ancient	S	6	4–2	67%	-0.02
overpass	—	3	3–0	100%	-0.03
boulder	—	2	2–0	100%	0.07
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,017Matches

54%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

76.3ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

15%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	46	65%	1.16	17.5
Mirage	26	42%	0.93	15.9
Nuke	25	56%	0.89	14.0
Anubis	24	54%	0.99	16.7
Inferno	19	53%	0.89	14.9
Ancient	13	77%	1.00	15.4
Train	10	50%	1.07	17.4
Overpass	5	40%	0.82	14.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy

35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.2%Spray accuracy

82.2%Counter-strafing

9.7°Preaim

606msReaction time

39.6%T opening success

32.8%CT opening success

0.40Enemies flashed / flash

5.2%Flash assists

11.52HE damage / grenade

11.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4029 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.6011% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–10	-0.02	18%	27 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.04	26%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	22%	26 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	22%	23 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	24%	21 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.01	27%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.04	19%	20 Aug →
anubis	25–22	0.03	16%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	40%	20 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.05	29%	16 Aug →
anubis	19–17	-0.03	24%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	23%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.00	17%	9 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	48%	9 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.08	3%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.02	30%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.02	24%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.00	26%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.05	14%	7 Aug →
boulder	13–7	0.10	28%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.06	25%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.05	14%	3 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	0.03	24%	3 Aug →
boulder	13–2	0.04	20%	3 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	26%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.02	17%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.00	27%	29 Jul →
ancient	16–14	-0.02	16%	29 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	10%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.01	42%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.07	14%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.02	39%	23 Jul →
nuke	14–16	0.02	20%	22 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.00	31%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.10	25%	20 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.02	13%	20 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	16%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	30%	18 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.06	10%	18 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.06	21%	9 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.03	23%	8 Jul →
overpass	13–9	-0.02	22%	5 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	11%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.00	14%	5 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.03	17%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	17%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.05	14%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.02	10%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.03	29%	3 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	23%	2 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.06	28%	1 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.09	14%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	25%	1 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	24%	1 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.00	7%	29 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.09	27%	28 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.04	21%	28 Jun →
dust2	10–5	0.01	21%	28 Jun →
nuke	13–6	-0.05	5%	28 Jun →
anubis	16–14	0.02	20%	27 Jun →
ancient	2–0	-0.08	0%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.06	23%	27 Jun →
anubis	16–14	-0.01	17%	25 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.05	15%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	17%	24 Jun →
dust2	8–13	0.07	19%	23 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	19%	21 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	15%	21 Jun →
overpass	13–6	0.00	19%	21 Jun →
inferno	0–3	-0.07	0%	20 Jun →
dust2	5–13	0.01	20%	20 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.04	40%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.01	22%	19 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.02	38%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–16	-0.02	23%	12 Jun →
inferno	9–13	0.03	31%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	9%	7 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	20%	6 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	8%	6 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	24%	6 Jun →
overpass	13–11	-0.07	35%	6 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	22%	5 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	29%	4 Jun →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	11%	1 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.02	19%	30 May →
mirage	16–14	-0.01	19%	25 May →
anubis	11–13	0.02	16%	25 May →
ancient	13–2	0.03	14%	24 May →
nuke	13–10	-0.06	13%	24 May →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	19%	24 May →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	21%	18 May →
nuke	9–13	-0.11	18%	14 May →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	14%	14 May →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	27%	14 May →
nuke	11–13	0.00	27%	13 May →
nuke	12–16	-0.03	19%	12 May →
anubis	8–13	0.02	12%	11 May →
inferno	13–11	0.02	21%	11 May →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	18%	10 May →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	29%	10 May →