Paddo

Paddo — CS2 Stats

NL76561197982471162[U:1:22205434]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,482Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,461Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating21,496Top 50% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#60256 of 247858 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,736 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,496 -2,910 3 Jun – 30 Sept · 10 days played
19,89524,406peak 24,4063 Jun30 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,736 +0 2 Sept – 3 Sept · 2 observations
1,7361,736peak 1,7362 Sept3 Sept
24,523Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,736Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-06-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,736
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 15 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,910 below peak (24,406)
  • -1,073 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,504 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches43——
Win rate63%——
K/D1.23——
Headshot %41%——

Measured 1 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,327), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate39.0%48.2%50.9%12.0% short
Shot accuracy17.6%13.3%13.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.001.071.090.08 short
Match win rate39.9%46.9%48.4%8.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPaddoFACEITLevel 9 · 1,736 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,496 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,736csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning53
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateLWWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +2.9pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 15–5 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility6.6
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.3
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time574ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy14.3%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 11–1 · anubis, 26 Sept →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · anubis, 6 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 19 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 24 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
12–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 74% over 19ancientWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB209–1145%0.01
nukeA1912–763%0.02
anubisS1914–574%0.01
infernoB157–847%-0.02
dust2A127–558%-0.03
ancientC94–544%0.00
mirage—40–40%-0.05
overpass—21–150%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

104,101Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
5,278Matches
39.9%Match win rate
39.0%Headshot %
17.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
8,715MVPs
2,174Hours (in match)
4,294Bombs planted
1,309Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4739,265
FAMAS2,244
P2502,025
AWP1,943
MP91,824

Lifetime map wins

10,851nuke
7,761dust2
7,748inferno
781vertigo
718train
484cbble
80office
62lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

576Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
73.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno8454%1.0114.7
Anubis7756%1.0414.8
Nuke6568%1.3016.4
Ancient4553%0.9814.7
Dust23531%0.8413.5
Mirage2931%0.9814.4
Overpass1650%1.1915.8
Cache1547%1.0214.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.5%Headshot accuracy
44.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.3%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
573msReaction time
39.2%T opening success
43.2%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
12.3%Flash assists
8.90HE damage / grenade
10.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.5061% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.1641% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–130.0118%30 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0315%30 Sept →
nuke13–70.1113%28 Sept →
anubis11–10.1516%26 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0219%25 Sept →
cache13–50.0523%23 Sept →
dust213–60.0414%23 Sept →
nuke12–16-0.0416%20 Sept →
nuke16–120.0713%19 Sept →
nuke13–70.0410%17 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0318%17 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0619%17 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0913%17 Sept →
inferno13–110.0316%15 Sept →
anubis13–80.1113%15 Sept →
cache13–90.079%13 Sept →
anubis10–130.035%13 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0211%13 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0112%12 Sept →
anubis13–90.0012%12 Sept →
inferno13–70.0719%12 Sept →
ancient13–50.0822%12 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0413%12 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0113%12 Sept →
ancient13–2-0.0614%12 Sept →
cache14–160.0414%10 Sept →
inferno14–160.0117%10 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0120%4 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0614%30 Aug →
cache13–100.069%30 Aug →
cache13–20.037%29 Aug →
anubis8–130.039%29 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0216%29 Aug →
ancient10–130.0113%29 Aug →
nuke13–50.0916%27 Aug →
anubis13–70.0212%27 Aug →
anubis13–50.014%24 Aug →
anubis13–10.0917%24 Aug →
dust29–130.0313%21 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0013%19 Aug →
dust213–20.0126%19 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0115%17 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0412%16 Aug →
cache10–130.0221%16 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.1014%11 Aug →
cache8–13-0.058%10 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0712%10 Aug →
cache2–7-0.0618%6 Aug →
ancient4–130.0616%2 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0110%2 Aug →
nuke13–110.0613%2 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0318%31 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0717%31 Jul →
cache13–110.0111%26 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0337%25 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0120%25 Jul →
cache13–90.1017%22 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0024%22 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0224%17 Jul →
cache13–80.0114%17 Jul →
cache15–150.0615%13 Jul →
ancient13–90.0316%13 Jul →
nuke13–10.0824%13 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0610%13 Jul →
cache2–13-0.0232%13 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.039%10 Jul →
nuke13–40.1522%10 Jul →
dust23–13-0.109%6 Jul →
anubis13–60.0244%6 Jul →
anubis16–14-0.0320%6 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0733%6 Jul →
dust216–13-0.0317%2 Jul →
nuke13–110.0614%26 Jun →
nuke2–13-0.1019%25 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0614%22 Jun →
anubis13–60.0423%22 Jun →
nuke16–130.0612%21 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0527%21 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.1019%21 Jun →
cache13–110.0017%21 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0432%20 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0411%18 Jun →
mirage1–13-0.079%18 Jun →
dust23–13-0.068%18 Jun →
anubis14–160.0416%17 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.0310%14 Jun →
inferno13–90.0310%14 Jun →
inferno8–130.0012%13 Jun →
inferno16–140.0015%8 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0013%8 Jun →
nuke13–30.005%8 Jun →
anubis13–80.0221%6 Jun →
overpass14–160.0113%6 Jun →
dust213–8-0.0513%6 Jun →
cache9–130.0630%6 Jun →
anubis13–80.0211%6 Jun →
nuke8–13-0.0211%3 Jun →
overpass13–70.0510%3 Jun →
inferno0–6-0.070%1 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0111%1 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.