illift

illift — CS2 Stats

HM76561197982459281[U:1:22193553]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

1,160Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,173Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1Tracked matches · now 1,160
0.0ppWin rate · 62.1% → 62.1%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 18 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

48Days played since 2026-06-18

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches120−19
Win rate0%60%−60pp
K/D0.490.91−0.42
Headshot %51%54%−3pp

Measured 18 Sep 202623 Sep 2026; previous 8 Sep 2026 → 18 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,070), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate48.7%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy14.9%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.831.051.060.23 short
Match win rate47.0%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGilliftFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning50
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55378Last 10055%Win rateLLWWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −7.4pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.5
Utility5.3
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning5.0
Utility5.3
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time594ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 10 Sept
58%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · anubis, 2 Sept
398msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 3 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 14 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 8ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S30201067%-0.01
infernoA27171063%0.00
cacheD1651131%0.01
ancientD82625%-0.04
mirageS86275%-0.02
anubisC73443%-0.02
nuke32167%0.03
overpass1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

59,722Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
3,480Matches
47.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
48.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
14.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
7,115MVPs
2,031Hours (in match)
4,417Bombs planted
813Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,659
AWP1,870
FAMAS1,405
MAC-101,388
Knife1,245
MP71,183

Lifetime map wins

11,104inferno
5,660train
4,765dust2
3,405nuke
1,015cbble
746vertigo
62dust
26italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,371Matches
51%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
66.5ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23773%0.9113.8
Inferno3158%0.9813.4
Mirage1464%0.8212.1
Ancient1436%0.8011.7
Anubis850%0.6910.8
Nuke838%0.9713.4
Train450%0.6011.8
Cache425%0.9814.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
30.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
69.6%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
597msReaction time
31.6%T opening success
49.7%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
8.81HE damage / grenade
6.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.5884% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–13-0.0214%21 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0616%17 Sept
dust213–9-0.0419%15 Sept
inferno13–70.1322%15 Sept
dust213–100.0129%14 Sept
dust213–10.0221%14 Sept
dust213–10-0.018%13 Sept
inferno13–80.0318%13 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0511%11 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0326%11 Sept
dust210–13-0.0221%11 Sept
dust213–160.0033%11 Sept
mirage16–12-0.0725%10 Sept
mirage10–30.0231%10 Sept
nuke13–50.1730%10 Sept
inferno6–130.0430%10 Sept
dust26–13-0.0226%9 Sept
dust219–17-0.0425%8 Sept
cache13–80.0420%6 Sept
dust213–9-0.1219%6 Sept
anubis12–12-0.0320%5 Sept
inferno13–20.0121%5 Sept
dust211–13-0.0628%4 Sept
anubis4–130.0323%3 Sept
dust213–110.0334%3 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0858%2 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0017%31 Aug
dust211–13-0.0218%30 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0212%29 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0629%29 Aug
dust26–13-0.0717%28 Aug
cache13–6-0.0318%28 Aug
cache12–120.0633%28 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0324%24 Aug
dust213–10-0.0436%24 Aug
cache11–13-0.0015%24 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0518%23 Aug
dust213–40.0520%22 Aug
inferno9–00.1750%22 Aug
inferno13–50.0313%22 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0316%21 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0325%20 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0512%19 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0519%19 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0429%18 Aug
dust213–11-0.0019%18 Aug
cache13–80.0023%15 Aug
dust213–90.0715%14 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0320%14 Aug
cache3–80.0016%14 Aug
anubis11–13-0.1225%6 Aug
inferno13–60.0121%31 Jul
mirage12–120.0223%31 Jul
inferno13–100.0420%30 Jul
dust213–9-0.0326%28 Jul
cache8–13-0.0524%28 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0220%28 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0724%27 Jul
anubis13–70.0218%26 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0414%26 Jul
inferno13–110.027%26 Jul
mirage13–90.0017%25 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0512%25 Jul
inferno13–70.0318%25 Jul
dust213–110.0215%25 Jul
inferno11–130.0711%24 Jul
cache6–13-0.0219%24 Jul
mirage13–50.0317%24 Jul
cache13–40.0631%24 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0412%23 Jul
dust23–130.0017%23 Jul
dust213–20.0318%22 Jul
dust213–80.0513%22 Jul
inferno13–80.0115%21 Jul
dust210–13-0.0119%20 Jul
inferno11–130.0117%20 Jul
dust219–16-0.0121%20 Jul
inferno13–60.0422%20 Jul
cache12–12-0.0131%20 Jul
inferno13–70.0024%17 Jul
cache12–12-0.0230%16 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0723%13 Jul
anubis13–20.0633%13 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0724%13 Jul
cache9–13-0.0215%13 Jul
dust213–10-0.095%6 Jul
dust213–100.0115%6 Jul
cache10–130.1121%4 Jul
dust213–100.1120%4 Jul
overpass9–130.0130%4 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0530%3 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0842%27 Jun
cache13–50.0523%27 Jun
dust29–130.0218%27 Jun
inferno2–13-0.110%27 Jun
dust213–4-0.0312%27 Jun
cache11–13-0.0220%24 Jun
inferno1–12-0.0318%24 Jun
cache6–13-0.0314%18 Jun
dust212–120.0531%18 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →