røkke

røkke — CS2 Stats

76561197980885365[U:1:20619637]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

813Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 Developing
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrøkkeFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning49
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42544Last 10042%Win rateWWLLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6
Aggression6.0
Utility5.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning4.9
Utility5.9
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time527ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 547ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — sanctum 9–1
132Biggest win — cache
3Longest win streak
W2Current streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 29% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD2882029%-0.03
nukeB1991047%-0.02
overpassA169756%-0.01
ancientC145936%-0.04
anubisS75271%-0.01
cacheA53260%0.00
sanctumA53260%0.07
cache_b2020%0.01
mirage1010%-0.02
poseidon1010%-0.09
rooftop1010%-0.02
vertigo1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 28). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

154Matches
51%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
81.9ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1587%1.3114.3
Mirage1450%1.0415.4
Ancient1450%1.0615.3
Nuke1275%2.3717.7
Anubis1127%0.9314.6
Dust21136%1.0414.2
Train250%1.1218.0
Vertigo1100%1.8613.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
29.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.2%Spray accuracy
68.8%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
553msReaction time
27.6%T opening success
38.7%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
12.04HE damage / grenade
7.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.5747% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–9-0.0614%26 Aug
cache13–20.0112%26 Aug
inferno10–13-0.088%26 Aug
cache5–13-0.0726%26 Aug
cache7–13-0.0213%4 Aug
cache13–8-0.0213%4 Aug
nuke13–100.0016%4 Aug
inferno13–100.0310%4 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0624%2 Aug
cache13–20.1225%2 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0615%21 May
nuke9–13-0.0320%21 May
anubis15–15-0.029%21 May
ancient13–11-0.059%21 May
nuke8–13-0.0111%10 May
overpass8–13-0.057%10 May
nuke13–40.0324%10 May
mirage1–13-0.0222%21 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0435%21 Apr
sanctum6–9-0.099%18 Apr
inferno6–9-0.0115%18 Apr
inferno8–8-0.0428%18 Apr
inferno9–40.1233%18 Apr
sanctum9–70.0513%18 Apr
overpass3–9-0.0121%18 Apr
sanctum9–50.1414%17 Apr
inferno3–9-0.1819%10 Apr
inferno9–40.0712%10 Apr
sanctum9–10.2919%10 Apr
poseidon7–9-0.093%10 Apr
overpass9–70.0418%10 Apr
sanctum7–9-0.0413%5 Apr
overpass4–13-0.0826%5 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0011%5 Apr
ancient13–11-0.1122%5 Apr
inferno2–13-0.050%5 Apr
overpass13–70.0633%27 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0111%27 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0420%27 Mar
inferno6–130.0523%27 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0813%27 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0524%11 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0130%11 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0229%11 Mar
inferno13–5-0.0027%3 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0023%3 Mar
nuke3–13-0.078%3 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0325%1 Mar
anubis13–90.0215%1 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0513%1 Mar
overpass8–13-0.0911%1 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0112%25 Feb
inferno13–70.0531%22 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0719%22 Feb
ancient5–130.0228%18 Feb
overpass10–13-0.0127%18 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0312%11 Feb
nuke13–9-0.0020%11 Feb
overpass13–100.0022%11 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0515%11 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0627%5 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0518%5 Feb
overpass13–6-0.0113%5 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0130%5 Feb
inferno3–13-0.0815%28 Jan
anubis13–9-0.0223%28 Jan
anubis13–60.0024%28 Jan
nuke8–0-0.0122%28 Jan
cache_b8–130.0219%21 Jan
anubis16–14-0.0222%21 Jan
cache_b13–160.0114%21 Jan
overpass13–11-0.0118%18 Jan
ancient4–13-0.0228%18 Jan
ancient8–13-0.0120%17 Jan
overpass2–13-0.0631%17 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0323%17 Jan
nuke13–5-0.0536%17 Jan
inferno13–70.0514%17 Jan
inferno7–9-0.123%13 Jan
overpass8–80.0613%13 Jan
rooftop6–9-0.0224%13 Jan
nuke8–80.0618%13 Jan
vertigo6–9-0.1025%13 Jan
ancient13–40.0119%11 Jan
inferno13–16-0.0623%11 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0510%11 Jan
nuke8–13-0.0236%11 Jan
overpass16–14-0.0111%7 Jan
inferno1–13-0.1020%7 Jan
inferno13–9-0.0121%6 Jan
overpass13–9-0.013%6 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0611%6 Jan
nuke13–50.0119%3 Jan
nuke13–7-0.0119%3 Jan
ancient8–13-0.0518%3 Jan
overpass13–90.0424%3 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0213%3 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0711%2 Jan
nuke4–13-0.0510%2 Jan
nuke4–90.0020%23 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →