-=JaBoo=- — CS2 Stats

TR76561197980353107[U:1:20087379]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,713Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport

Premier CS Rating21,934Top 50% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#53499 of 241868 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,821 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 21,934 → 21,934

0Faceit ELO · 1,821 → 1,821

+3Tracked matches · now 1,713

0.0ppWin rate · 42.9% → 42.9%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 22 days played since 23 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,934 +3,442 23 Aug – 23 Sept · 21 days played

Faceit ELO: 1,821 +0 1 Sept – 23 Sept · 4 observations

23,723Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,821Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

22Days played since 2026-08-23

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,821
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 180 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01
Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

1,276 below peak (23,210)
+3,442 over 30 days · improving
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,066 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-14
Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim32

Positioning67

Utility78

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–43–9Last 10048%Win rateTWLLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–3–1 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

2–7–1 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

7–12–1 · 35% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 564ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim3.2

Utility7.8

Positioning6.7

Opening Duels5.0

Clutch3.2

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 55% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.2

Positioning6.7

Utility7.8

Mechanics1.2

Opening Duels5.7

Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time548ms+0ms

first ⅓ avg 548ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms

Headshot accuracy15.4%−0.4%

first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 12–0 · anubis, 11 Sept →

32%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · dust2, 27 Aug →

367msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · anubis, 31 Aug →

13–1Biggest win · ancient, 13 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak

5–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

22Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9dust2Weakest map · 25% over 24

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	D	24	6–18	25%	-0.00
cache	C	20	8–12	40%	0.01
inferno	B	20	10–10	50%	0.00
ancient	A	19	12–7	63%	0.01
anubis	S	9	7–2	78%	0.04
mirage	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.02
nuke	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.01
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

255Matches

56%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

76.7ADR

37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	18	39%	0.95	15.9
Inferno	14	50%	1.11	16.7
Mirage	9	44%	0.98	17.2
Ancient	8	62%	0.98	14.3
Overpass	6	67%	0.90	12.7
Anubis	4	100%	1.47	16.0
Cache	4	75%	1.09	15.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy

28.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.5%Spray accuracy

55.3%Counter-strafing

11.7°Preaim

546msReaction time

57.0%T opening success

48.2%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

13.4%Flash assists

13.44HE damage / grenade

17.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	15–15	-0.03	10%	23 Sept →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	16%	23 Sept →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	13%	23 Sept →
dust2	14–16	0.03	20%	22 Sept →
cache	10–13	-0.00	12%	22 Sept →
inferno	14–16	-0.00	13%	22 Sept →
anubis	14–16	0.01	13%	22 Sept →
inferno	11–0	0.07	16%	22 Sept →
cache	4–13	-0.02	19%	20 Sept →
cache	5–13	-0.02	15%	20 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.05	11%	20 Sept →
inferno	13–5	0.06	16%	20 Sept →
inferno	13–16	0.03	19%	16 Sept →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	16%	16 Sept →
ancient	13–5	0.02	11%	16 Sept →
ancient	13–6	0.01	6%	16 Sept →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	13%	15 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.01	27%	15 Sept →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	18%	15 Sept →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	24%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–6	0.03	15%	15 Sept →
inferno	13–6	0.04	25%	14 Sept →
cache	15–15	0.02	10%	14 Sept →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	21%	14 Sept →
dust2	9–13	0.04	19%	13 Sept →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	13%	13 Sept →
nuke	13–11	-0.06	11%	13 Sept →
anubis	13–8	0.05	19%	13 Sept →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	22%	13 Sept →
ancient	13–1	0.02	19%	13 Sept →
inferno	5–13	-0.07	6%	12 Sept →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	7%	12 Sept →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	17%	12 Sept →
dust2	16–12	0.01	11%	12 Sept →
cache	13–2	0.01	10%	12 Sept →
ancient	2–0	-0.04	0%	12 Sept →
inferno	13–16	-0.04	19%	12 Sept →
inferno	13–6	-0.00	6%	12 Sept →
debris	9–5	0.01	11%	12 Sept →
cache	14–16	-0.01	13%	11 Sept →
cache	13–5	-0.01	17%	11 Sept →
anubis	12–0	0.16	8%	11 Sept →
inferno	15–15	-0.01	20%	11 Sept →
overpass	10–13	0.00	20%	9 Sept →
inferno	15–15	-0.04	15%	9 Sept →
inferno	13–7	-0.03	5%	9 Sept →
cache	7–13	-0.07	14%	6 Sept →
dust2	12–16	-0.03	14%	5 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	26%	5 Sept →
dust2	13–9	0.04	8%	5 Sept →
inferno	8–13	0.08	17%	5 Sept →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	13%	5 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.01	20%	5 Sept →
dust2	6–13	-0.09	10%	5 Sept →
ancient	13–5	0.07	14%	5 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.03	17%	5 Sept →
cache	13–7	-0.01	11%	3 Sept →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	19%	3 Sept →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	13%	3 Sept →
anubis	13–9	0.01	17%	3 Sept →
inferno	13–3	-0.03	4%	3 Sept →
cache	13–5	-0.00	18%	3 Sept →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	20%	1 Sept →
dust2	16–14	0.02	16%	31 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.02	17%	31 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	13%	31 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	22%	31 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.04	18%	31 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.01	24%	31 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.01	14%	30 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.04	16%	30 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	14%	30 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.07	25%	30 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.02	17%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.00	9%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	16%	29 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	10%	29 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.03	16%	29 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.00	10%	29 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	21%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.03	10%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.07	26%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.03	16%	28 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.01	11%	28 Aug →
anubis	12–16	0.10	13%	28 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.06	32%	27 Aug →
ancient	14–16	-0.02	10%	27 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	21%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	7%	26 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.04	12%	26 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.03	14%	26 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.12	27%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.08	12%	26 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.03	15%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.10	12%	25 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.04	11%	25 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.03	14%	25 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.01	17%	23 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.00	17%	23 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	16%	23 Aug →