shootatme- — CS2 Stats

CZ76561198003765792[U:1:43500064]Steam profile ↗

7,875Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,533Pink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7038 of 20444 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,249 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning58

Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateWLLLLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1

Aggression9.0

Utility7.2

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels4.1

Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning5.8

Utility7.2

Mechanics5.6

Opening Duels4.1

Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time527ms−16ms

first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms

Headshot accuracy22.8%+5.6%

first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — ancient 13–1

13–1Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 58% over 26dust2Weakest map · 40% over 25

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	A	26	15–11	58%	0.01
dust2	C	25	10–15	40%	0.02
ancient	A	16	9–7	56%	0.00
inferno	B	15	7–8	47%	-0.00
anubis	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.01
vertigo	—	4	3–1	75%	0.07
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02
mirage	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

7,823Matches

49%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

79.0ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	349	50%	0.96	15.3
Dust2	255	50%	1.09	16.0
Inferno	209	54%	1.00	15.6
Anubis	183	42%	0.89	14.6
Nuke	100	44%	0.90	15.0
Mirage	67	39%	0.81	13.4
Cache	64	53%	0.94	14.1
Overpass	43	65%	1.09	17.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy

35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.2%Spray accuracy

75.3%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

532msReaction time

38.0%T opening success

54.6%CT opening success

0.77Enemies flashed / flash

6.0%Flash assists

9.58HE damage / grenade

13.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.0346% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–7	0.00	20%	29 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.02	26%	28 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.06	19%	27 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.05	15%	24 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	33%	24 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.02	48%	23 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.09	29%	23 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.02	15%	22 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	18%	21 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	13%	19 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.09	31%	19 Aug →
anubis	17–19	-0.05	17%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.01	7%	18 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.04	15%	17 Aug →
inferno	16–12	0.09	17%	16 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	27%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	26%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.01	52%	15 Aug →
anubis	15–19	0.01	11%	14 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	21%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.05	40%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	29%	13 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.02	23%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	6%	13 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	17%	13 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	11%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.01	20%	13 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.09	13%	12 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.07	33%	12 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.04	29%	10 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.04	19%	10 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.01	17%	8 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	35%	8 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.04	43%	7 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.06	31%	7 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.02	9%	6 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.03	24%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.11	27%	6 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.01	16%	6 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.00	32%	5 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	0.02	12%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	28%	5 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	21%	5 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.00	15%	5 Aug →
vertigo	13–4	0.18	40%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	31%	4 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	14%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	27%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	25%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	23%	3 Aug →
vertigo	6–13	0.05	10%	2 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.00	16%	2 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	15%	2 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.03	15%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.06	17%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.02	31%	2 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	26%	2 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.04	25%	2 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.05	21%	30 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.04	15%	30 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.00	21%	30 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.09	25%	30 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	20%	30 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.01	20%	30 Jul →
cache	16–12	0.04	33%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.05	15%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.14	18%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.17	12%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.05	12%	28 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	8%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.06	16%	27 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.05	16%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.03	11%	27 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.09	17%	27 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.01	26%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.03	20%	26 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.02	8%	25 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.02	15%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	28%	25 Jul →
cache	19–17	-0.03	19%	25 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	12%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.01	11%	24 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.09	8%	23 Jul →
anubis	16–12	-0.02	21%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.05	10%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.03	16%	21 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.10	16%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.01	23%	20 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.08	22%	20 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.04	10%	19 Jul →
ancient	14–16	-0.02	13%	19 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.01	17%	19 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	35%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	27%	15 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	13%	15 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.02	10%	15 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.05	14%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.28	18%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.04	37%	14 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.05	24%	14 Jul →