tiou

tiou — CS2 Stats

FI76561197979973778[U:1:19708050]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

418Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,427Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating14,884Blue band · top ~29% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (40 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 14,884 → 14,884
+4Tracked matches · now 418
−2.1ppWin rate · 59.3% → 57.1%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,884 -815 2 Jun – 24 Sept · 27 days played
13,83617,230peak 17,2302 Jun24 Sept
17,632Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-06-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,346 below peak (17,230)
  • -115 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 116 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate36.7%42.0%44.4%7.7% short
Shot accuracy20.1%9.6%11.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.140.981.03above
Match win rate45.4%43.8%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtiouPREMIER14,884 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning54
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–49–6Last 10045%Win rateLWWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · +25ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility4.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch6.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.4
Utility4.2
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time549ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 6 Aug →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 3 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · dust2, 11 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 6 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
4–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 10ancientWeakest map · 32% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2111–1052%0.00
ancientD196–1332%0.00
dust2C188–1044%0.01
infernoB178–947%0.01
cacheA106–460%-0.00
anubisC94–544%-0.00
nukeC52–340%-0.00
vertigo—10–10%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

65,229Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 25% of Blue band
2,742Matches
45.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Blue band
36.7%Headshot %
20.1%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Blue band
6,670MVPs
1,427Hours (in match)
3,584Bombs planted
753Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,337inferno
3,057dust2
2,528cbble
1,129train
848nuke
248vertigo
118office
57assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

246Matches
53%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
82.4ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

53%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1242%1.0414.7
Mirage1030%1.1217.8
Ancient888%1.5117.1
Anubis757%1.0515.7
Dust2650%1.1819.2
Nuke560%1.0916.8
Train4100%1.1315.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
72.6%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
544msReaction time
33.1%T opening success
53.1%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
8.55HE damage / grenade
3.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.9967% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3977 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.126% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–130.0117%24 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0412%24 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.038%24 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0719%24 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0113%11 Aug →
dust25–13-0.057%10 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0217%10 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.018%7 Aug →
cache13–30.0517%7 Aug →
anubis13–100.029%7 Aug →
ancient11–130.0016%7 Aug →
inferno13–50.0718%7 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0813%6 Aug →
ancient10–130.0113%6 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0812%6 Aug →
mirage13–10.1917%6 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0216%6 Aug →
ancient15–150.058%5 Aug →
dust213–70.0121%5 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.0511%5 Aug →
dust213–30.0311%4 Aug →
nuke13–40.0115%4 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0126%4 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0314%4 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0015%3 Aug →
dust213–20.0436%3 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.019%3 Aug →
mirage13–20.0617%3 Aug →
nuke13–10.0830%3 Aug →
inferno13–50.0123%3 Aug →
dust213–100.0120%2 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0118%2 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0623%31 Jul →
dust215–150.1113%31 Jul →
ancient15–150.0116%31 Jul →
mirage8–130.0322%31 Jul →
cache7–130.0418%30 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0122%30 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0012%30 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0213%30 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0214%29 Jul →
dust215–150.0430%29 Jul →
mirage16–140.0311%29 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0710%29 Jul →
cache13–90.0124%28 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0217%28 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.075%28 Jul →
ancient13–60.0814%28 Jul →
mirage13–40.0115%27 Jul →
anubis13–30.0712%27 Jul →
ancient8–130.0518%27 Jul →
dust213–90.0225%27 Jul →
inferno13–80.0512%27 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0015%26 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0713%26 Jul →
mirage13–110.0116%26 Jul →
ancient13–80.0416%26 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0116%24 Jul →
dust213–20.078%24 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0119%24 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.0312%14 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0414%14 Jul →
ancient13–100.0416%13 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0116%13 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0321%8 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0716%8 Jul →
vertigo8–13-0.0017%8 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0220%8 Jul →
cache13–80.0719%6 Jul →
inferno13–50.0519%6 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.0113%6 Jul →
mirage13–30.0211%6 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0211%28 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0515%28 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0817%28 Jun →
inferno13–60.0221%25 Jun →
ancient13–50.0327%25 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.0721%24 Jun →
anubis11–130.0216%24 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0017%22 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0125%22 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0714%22 Jun →
inferno13–50.0211%22 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0113%22 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0430%22 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0712%22 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0113%21 Jun →
dust28–130.0027%21 Jun →
anubis13–16-0.0011%9 Jun →
inferno10–130.0414%9 Jun →
inferno13–30.0918%8 Jun →
ancient11–130.0214%8 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0417%7 Jun →
inferno10–130.0026%7 Jun →
dust213–110.0526%7 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0117%7 Jun →
mirage13–40.1015%6 Jun →
nuke8–130.069%6 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0325%2 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.0213%2 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.