Bonkers!

Bonkers! — CS2 Stats

76561197979109074[U:1:18843346]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

519Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,110Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6 · 962 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 11 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,529 +1,227 17 Feb3 Jun · 23 days played
13,95216,276peak 16,27617 Feb3 Jun
16,568Peak Premier in tracked matches
962Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-02-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 962
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 89 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,275), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate43.4%44.8%45.7%2.3% short
Shot accuracy11.2%12.5%12.7%1.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.951.031.050.10 short
Match win rate33.3%45.2%45.7%12.4% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 7 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBonkers!FACEITLevel 6 · 962 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO962csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning50
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5446Last 10054%Win rateLWLLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −64ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim4.9
Utility4.8
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning5.0
Utility4.8
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time585ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–8 · nuke, 16 Feb
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 23 Apr
430msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · ancient, 29 Apr
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 14 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB29151452%-0.00
infernoA1710759%-0.00
ancientB168850%0.00
mirageC125742%-0.01
anubisS118373%-0.02
overpassS64267%-0.02
cacheS64267%-0.03
dust23030%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,639Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
2,193Matches
33.3%Match win rate
43.4%Headshot %
11.2%Shot accuracy
2,989MVPs
731Hours (in match)
1,266Bombs planted
342Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-477,823
AWP4,284
AUG2,564
FAMAS1,580
MP71,363

Lifetime map wins

4,017inferno
2,611nuke
1,584dust2
306train
148ar_shoots
98vertigo
49safehouse
34ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

228Matches
53%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
72.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke3152%0.9614.1
Inferno2365%1.0215.9
Ancient1953%0.8411.8
Anubis1662%0.9213.6
Overpass1050%0.8715.1
Cache978%0.9013.8
Mirage812%0.7614.8
Dust2250%1.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.5%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.4%Spray accuracy
73.6%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
592msReaction time
27.6%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
10.61HE damage / grenade
3.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4878% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4806 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.5621% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–130.0221%14 Sept
nuke13–20.0719%14 Sept
inferno8–13-0.028%14 Sept
nuke2–13-0.1016%22 Jun
mirage13–90.0711%3 Jun
inferno5–130.0216%25 May
nuke13–60.006%25 May
overpass13–11-0.0412%24 May
anubis13–5-0.0118%24 May
inferno13–60.0722%24 May
ancient10–130.0122%23 May
nuke20–22-0.0314%20 May
nuke7–130.0618%17 May
ancient11–13-0.0211%14 May
nuke13–7-0.0210%6 May
cache13–5-0.0118%5 May
inferno13–20.0218%3 May
anubis5–13-0.0413%2 May
mirage8–130.027%2 May
cache17–19-0.0317%2 May
nuke13–50.0324%1 May
anubis5–13-0.038%1 May
cache13–7-0.0219%1 May
nuke6–130.0530%1 May
anubis13–7-0.0510%30 Apr
cache13–16-0.074%30 Apr
nuke10–130.0211%30 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0316%30 Apr
ancient13–70.0319%30 Apr
ancient13–70.037%29 Apr
cache13–10-0.0220%29 Apr
cache13–9-0.0319%29 Apr
nuke13–20.0010%24 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0014%23 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0432%23 Apr
nuke13–16-0.0221%22 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0722%22 Apr
mirage9–13-0.028%17 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0015%17 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0410%17 Apr
mirage11–13-0.038%16 Apr
inferno13–80.0318%16 Apr
nuke13–70.028%15 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0011%15 Apr
nuke11–13-0.059%14 Apr
mirage13–70.0316%14 Apr
ancient13–50.0420%14 Apr
overpass13–90.0213%13 Apr
dust28–130.0111%12 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0213%12 Apr
mirage13–60.0121%8 Apr
nuke13–50.0418%8 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0113%7 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0011%7 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0328%26 Mar
inferno10–130.0214%26 Mar
anubis13–9-0.0317%26 Mar
ancient3–13-0.0518%25 Mar
anubis13–9-0.0521%24 Mar
ancient13–70.0018%24 Mar
inferno13–80.0115%24 Mar
inferno19–17-0.0313%23 Mar
nuke13–7-0.0719%23 Mar
anubis13–10-0.0115%22 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0219%18 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0326%18 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0215%18 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0215%18 Mar
inferno16–130.0015%16 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0516%15 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0023%3 Mar
nuke13–4-0.0111%3 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0228%3 Mar
overpass16–13-0.0115%1 Mar
overpass2–8-0.0620%26 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0211%26 Feb
inferno13–90.019%25 Feb
nuke13–160.0116%25 Feb
ancient13–80.0112%24 Feb
nuke13–6-0.0219%24 Feb
overpass13–40.006%24 Feb
ancient6–13-0.048%22 Feb
dust25–13-0.0318%22 Feb
nuke8–13-0.064%22 Feb
inferno9–13-0.078%22 Feb
mirage9–13-0.028%17 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0312%17 Feb
nuke13–50.0318%17 Feb
ancient13–50.0421%17 Feb
anubis13–80.0516%17 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0014%16 Feb
nuke13–80.0719%16 Feb
dust29–13-0.0723%16 Feb
nuke3–13-0.0310%16 Feb
overpass7–13-0.0422%16 Feb
nuke13–80.0116%16 Feb
inferno13–40.0610%12 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0514%12 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0322%12 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0311%11 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →