Sani

Sani — CS2 Stats

76561197978485118[U:1:18219390]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,378Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,300Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.3 LearningSupport
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,141 → 1,141
+3Tracked matches · now 1,378
−3.3ppWin rate · 36.7% → 33.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 25 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,769 +1,046 16 Jun6 Jul · 4 days played
17,72318,769peak 18,76916 Jun6 Jul
18,769Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,141Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-05-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,141
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 60 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches611−5
Win rate17%27%−11pp
K/D0.800.66+0.14
Headshot %45%42%+3pp

Measured 18 Sep 202624 Sep 2026; previous 11 Sep 2026 → 18 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSaniPEAK ELO1,141csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning32
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52426Last 10052%Win rateLLLLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 10

  • 19 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim4.6
Utility5.3
Positioning3.2
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning3.2
Utility5.3
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time605ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 675ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy14.0%−4.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–10 · iris, 7 Jul
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · anubis, 28 May
375msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · train, 12 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 24 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L6Current streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

boulderBest map · 100% over 5ancientWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC1871139%-0.04
anubisB115645%-0.03
ancientC83538%-0.04
shelterS75271%-0.01
boulderS550100%0.02
poseidon41325%-0.13
canopy41325%-0.01
eldorado31233%-0.05
splinter32167%-0.04
timber31233%-0.01
elevation32167%0.02
iris330100%0.02
echolab31233%-0.04
bridge32167%0.01
biome21150%-0.03
train21150%-0.04
nuke220100%-0.01
fachwerk220100%-0.03
mocha21150%0.01
mirage1010%-0.03
mills110100%-0.00
office110100%-0.00
jura110100%-0.03
vertigo1010%0.00
dust21010%-0.06
italy110100%0.01
debris110100%-0.05
warden1010%-0.02
inferno1010%-0.02
pango1010%-0.04
overpass110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

127,009Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
5,775Matches
38.7%Match win rate
43.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
15.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
9,846MVPs
3,195Hours (in match)
6,178Bombs planted
1,715Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4738,454
AWP10,898
P2503,679
FAMAS2,550

Lifetime map wins

5,374dust2
5,311inferno
3,905nuke
1,540train
1,522cbble
971vertigo
751office
248lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

654Matches
52%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
69.7ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21759%0.9012.0
Anubis1644%0.9314.3
Ancient1560%1.0513.7
Inferno1331%0.9114.0
Nuke1362%0.8213.2
Mirage1331%0.6311.0
Bridge1164%0.9314.4
Boulder1080%0.9614.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.7%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
70.6%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
593msReaction time
20.8%T opening success
40.3%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
9.36HE damage / grenade
5.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.6682% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.7988% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis3–13-0.104%20 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0224%20 Sept
anubis5–13-0.024%20 Sept
poseidon3–9-0.2118%18 Sept
cache5–13-0.1122%15 Sept
eldorado2–9-0.1927%15 Sept
splinter13–11-0.069%13 Sept
canopy8–13-0.0118%13 Sept
poseidon6–9-0.0110%9 Sept
anubis9–13-0.094%8 Sept
ancient16–130.0211%8 Sept
cache11–13-0.0613%6 Sept
cache3–1-0.1133%6 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0723%6 Sept
mirage10–13-0.037%6 Sept
ancient7–130.0120%6 Sept
ancient0–13-0.210%6 Sept
anubis13–100.0415%5 Sept
cache13–7-0.0310%5 Sept
mills13–9-0.0011%5 Sept
timber3–13-0.0515%5 Sept
shelter13–60.0310%5 Sept
boulder13–20.0613%5 Sept
office13–3-0.0024%3 Sept
anubis7–13-0.063%1 Sept
eldorado9–30.0815%31 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0514%29 Aug
poseidon9–4-0.0417%29 Aug
cache6–130.0216%29 Aug
cache13–9-0.0214%27 Aug
cache7–13-0.0120%26 Aug
cache4–13-0.0921%26 Aug
elevation2–13-0.074%20 Aug
timber7–130.0019%20 Aug
canopy12–16-0.0219%20 Aug
biome4–13-0.049%20 Aug
shelter13–4-0.0318%20 Aug
canopy13–16-0.027%16 Aug
biome13–11-0.027%14 Aug
timber13–100.0312%14 Aug
jura13–9-0.0312%13 Aug
train11–13-0.1010%12 Aug
train13–30.0213%12 Aug
splinter7–13-0.0423%9 Aug
elevation13–60.0815%8 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0412%8 Aug
elevation13–100.0421%7 Aug
splinter16–13-0.0116%7 Aug
canopy13–80.0012%7 Aug
cache15–15-0.0718%5 Aug
nuke16–12-0.0210%4 Aug
ancient13–1-0.0712%4 Aug
vertigo5–130.0014%21 Jul
boulder13–80.0323%21 Jul
dust26–13-0.0616%20 Jul
cache13–50.0017%20 Jul
italy13–90.0113%19 Jul
shelter13–40.0416%19 Jul
boulder13–50.0113%19 Jul
debris9–6-0.0513%17 Jul
eldorado6–9-0.0216%17 Jul
shelter4–13-0.0516%15 Jul
boulder9–1-0.028%14 Jul
fachwerk13–4-0.0123%14 Jul
fachwerk13–7-0.0422%12 Jul
shelter13–1-0.0410%12 Jul
shelter12–12-0.0220%10 Jul
shelter11–30.0029%10 Jul
boulder13–30.0121%10 Jul
cache7–13-0.0314%8 Jul
iris13–100.1019%7 Jul
cache13–5-0.0623%7 Jul
cache13–110.0115%7 Jul
warden12–12-0.028%6 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0518%6 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0115%6 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0219%6 Jul
cache12–12-0.0420%5 Jul
cache13–30.0214%3 Jul
cache1–13-0.0116%3 Jul
poseidon2–9-0.2523%3 Jul
mocha13–5-0.0221%30 Jun
iris19–17-0.019%30 Jun
echolab13–4-0.0114%30 Jun
mocha10–130.0325%29 Jun
echolab2–13-0.137%29 Jun
iris13–11-0.0419%28 Jun
echolab4–130.0231%28 Jun
bridge16–140.0717%27 Jun
bridge13–50.0019%26 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0215%26 Jun
bridge11–13-0.0510%25 Jun
pango11–13-0.0420%24 Jun
ancient13–00.0214%24 Jun
cache7–13-0.0531%16 Jun
overpass13–5-0.048%16 Jun
anubis13–50.0435%28 May
anubis13–30.0729%28 May
anubis13–10-0.0317%27 May
cache12–12-0.087%25 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →