sLice

sLice — CS2 Stats

FI76561197977500123[U:1:17234395]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,786Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#89540 of 259900 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,796 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,770 -1,158 5 Sept – 6 Oct · 3 days played
19,77020,928peak 20,9285 Sept6 Oct
21,151Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,796Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,796
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 205 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsLiceFACEITLevel 9 · 1,796 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,796csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning47
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–49Last 10051%Win rateWLWLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · −4ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility5.0
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.7
Utility5.0
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time542ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 541ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy15.5%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–9 · inferno, 7 Sept →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · inferno, 3 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 25 Oct →
18–0Biggest win · nuke, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
14–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2011–955%-0.00
ancientA1912–763%-0.01
mirageC177–1041%-0.00
nukeA116–555%-0.02
dust2C114–736%-0.03
cacheS96–367%0.01
anubisD71–614%-0.00
vertigoS64–267%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,644Matches
50%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
72.9ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage51051%0.9614.3
Ancient45551%0.9314.0
Nuke40554%0.9714.2
Inferno40448%0.9714.1
Dust227546%1.0014.3
Anubis24146%0.9513.8
Overpass10048%0.9014.1
Train8558%0.9613.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
69.3%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
535msReaction time
20.8%T opening success
49.3%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
6.51HE damage / grenade
10.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.7921% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–9-0.0218%3 Nov →
ancient7–13-0.036%31 Oct →
inferno13–110.0616%31 Oct →
vertigo5–13-0.0610%30 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0415%30 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0421%29 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0021%28 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0118%27 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0613%27 Oct →
anubis10–130.0124%27 Oct →
dust26–13-0.108%26 Oct →
dust26–130.0633%26 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0717%26 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0813%25 Oct →
vertigo13–7-0.053%25 Oct →
inferno13–90.0212%24 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0314%24 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.009%24 Oct →
mirage6–130.0710%24 Oct →
inferno19–160.0020%24 Oct →
nuke17–19-0.0215%23 Oct →
ancient13–30.0224%23 Oct →
mirage13–100.0214%23 Oct →
inferno19–17-0.0121%23 Oct →
ancient16–120.0024%23 Oct →
vertigo10–130.0112%22 Oct →
ancient22–190.0011%20 Oct →
nuke13–40.0112%18 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0314%17 Oct →
mirage13–110.0720%17 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0114%17 Oct →
anubis9–130.0114%17 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0416%17 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0126%16 Oct →
mirage13–100.0422%15 Oct →
anubis11–130.0615%12 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0013%11 Oct →
nuke13–50.0232%11 Oct →
ancient13–110.0129%9 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0212%9 Oct →
ancient13–70.024%6 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.039%6 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0312%3 Oct →
ancient13–30.008%3 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0710%3 Oct →
inferno13–80.0613%3 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.014%3 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.0745%3 Oct →
cache8–10.0118%3 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0116%3 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0610%2 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.065%2 Oct →
ancient0–13-0.016%2 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0220%1 Oct →
vertigo13–10-0.049%26 Sept →
anubis16–19-0.027%26 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0120%24 Sept →
dust217–19-0.047%24 Sept →
cache10–130.0230%23 Sept →
cache13–60.0320%22 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0111%22 Sept →
dust213–11-0.049%21 Sept →
mirage13–90.0421%21 Sept →
vertigo13–110.0214%18 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.045%16 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0218%16 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0329%13 Sept →
nuke18–00.0113%12 Sept →
inferno16–120.0113%12 Sept →
inferno11–130.0610%11 Sept →
mirage7–130.0015%11 Sept →
ancient13–110.0410%11 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0313%10 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0311%10 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0227%10 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0213%10 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0516%10 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0010%9 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0110%9 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0511%9 Sept →
cache13–10.0421%8 Sept →
inferno13–90.1023%7 Sept →
mirage10–130.0619%7 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0314%6 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0313%6 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0315%5 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.098%5 Sept →
dust213–30.0221%5 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0511%5 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0723%5 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0212%4 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0511%4 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0422%4 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0230%4 Sept →
cache13–80.0417%3 Sept →
ancient13–110.0115%3 Sept →
inferno13–70.0219%2 Sept →
ancient13–100.0118%29 Aug →
inferno13–110.0222%29 Aug →
mirage19–220.0122%28 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.