✪ DNS~ — CS2 Stats

FI76561197977441856[U:1:17176128]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,038Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidClutch Specialist

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (56 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+95Tracked matches · now 2,038

−9.0ppWin rate · 42.3% → 33.3%

Rating over time

27Days played since 2026-09-06

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning68

Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY30–63–7Last 10030%Win rateLLWLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −8.0pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate up 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–4 · 20% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

6–4 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 519ms

Last 20

6–13–1 · 30% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+3.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3

Utility6.6

Positioning6.8

Opening Duels2.8

Clutch10.0

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning6.8

Utility6.6

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels5.2

Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time540ms+20ms

first ⅓ avg 520ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms

Headshot accuracy20.8%+1.7%

first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 4 Oct →

47%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · nuke, 26 Oct →

344msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · ancient, 25 Sept →

13–1Biggest win · inferno, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 45% over 20dust2Weakest map · 13% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	D	27	9–18	33%	-0.00
inferno	B	20	9–11	45%	0.02
nuke	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.01
vertigo	D	10	3–7	30%	0.02
ancient	D	8	2–6	25%	0.01
dust2	D	8	1–7	13%	0.01
anubis	D	7	1–6	14%	0.01
overpass	—	4	0–4	0%	0.01
mirage	—	3	0–3	0%	0.04
train	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

64Matches

48%Win rate

0.92Avg K/D

91.2ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	6	67%	0.98	14.5
Mirage	3	33%	0.82	13.7
Anubis	3	100%	1.24	18.3
Ancient	2	50%	1.14	21.0
Overpass	1	0%	0.55	11.0
Vertigo	1	100%	0.81	13.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy

36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.7%Spray accuracy

81.4%Counter-strafing

8.6°Preaim

539msReaction time

58.4%T opening success

43.5%CT opening success

0.63Enemies flashed / flash

4.3%Flash assists

11.05HE damage / grenade

10.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	2–13	-0.01	19%	30 Oct →
dust2	10–13	0.04	15%	30 Oct →
train	13–11	0.01	20%	30 Oct →
inferno	9–13	0.02	17%	29 Oct →
cache	6–13	-0.06	21%	29 Oct →
vertigo	13–9	0.02	17%	29 Oct →
cache	13–6	0.06	14%	27 Oct →
ancient	13–11	0.09	14%	27 Oct →
inferno	13–6	-0.02	23%	27 Oct →
inferno	13–8	0.06	25%	26 Oct →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	47%	26 Oct →
cache	10–13	0.00	28%	26 Oct →
train	7–13	-0.02	21%	26 Oct →
cache	8–13	0.04	15%	25 Oct →
mirage	7–13	0.11	29%	25 Oct →
cache	3–13	-0.03	8%	24 Oct →
anubis	4–13	0.01	22%	24 Oct →
mirage	12–12	0.07	26%	23 Oct →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	38%	23 Oct →
nuke	0–13	-0.05	30%	23 Oct →
dust2	11–13	0.02	29%	23 Oct →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	21%	23 Oct →
cache	13–10	-0.01	23%	23 Oct →
cache	8–13	-0.06	12%	23 Oct →
inferno	13–5	0.07	9%	23 Oct →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	26%	23 Oct →
inferno	12–12	-0.01	20%	22 Oct →
cache	12–12	0.00	16%	22 Oct →
nuke	6–2	0.10	24%	22 Oct →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	19%	20 Oct →
inferno	13–11	0.07	16%	20 Oct →
cache	9–13	-0.06	9%	20 Oct →
anubis	12–12	-0.02	14%	19 Oct →
dust2	13–4	0.08	33%	19 Oct →
inferno	12–12	0.10	26%	19 Oct →
cache	13–6	0.02	24%	19 Oct →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	15%	19 Oct →
anubis	7–13	0.04	9%	18 Oct →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	22%	18 Oct →
cache	13–9	0.03	16%	18 Oct →
inferno	10–13	-0.08	16%	18 Oct →
cache	10–13	-0.09	22%	18 Oct →
vertigo	6–13	-0.02	16%	10 Oct →
dust2	6–13	0.05	14%	10 Oct →
cache	9–13	-0.04	8%	10 Oct →
inferno	13–1	0.10	20%	10 Oct →
ancient	7–13	-0.00	20%	10 Oct →
ancient	7–13	0.03	14%	7 Oct →
inferno	11–13	0.03	13%	7 Oct →
cache	13–2	-0.00	17%	7 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.02	11%	5 Oct →
vertigo	1–13	-0.10	20%	5 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.02	14%	5 Oct →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	15%	4 Oct →
cache	13–3	0.19	11%	4 Oct →
ancient	7–13	0.01	13%	4 Oct →
dust2	8–13	0.00	20%	29 Sept →
vertigo	9–13	0.02	14%	29 Sept →
cache	10–13	0.06	13%	29 Sept →
inferno	12–12	0.02	12%	29 Sept →
nuke	13–7	0.06	14%	28 Sept →
ancient	0–13	-0.05	0%	25 Sept →
vertigo	11–13	-0.02	12%	25 Sept →
inferno	9–13	0.02	14%	25 Sept →
anubis	11–13	0.06	19%	25 Sept →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	13%	25 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.01	19%	25 Sept →
overpass	6–13	-0.04	23%	24 Sept →
ancient	8–13	0.02	8%	24 Sept →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	14%	24 Sept →
cache	6–13	0.03	22%	23 Sept →
overpass	9–13	0.08	13%	23 Sept →
vertigo	8–13	-0.02	30%	23 Sept →
nuke	8–13	0.02	18%	23 Sept →
anubis	13–7	0.05	24%	22 Sept →
cache	10–13	-0.01	22%	22 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	12%	22 Sept →
inferno	13–11	0.01	20%	21 Sept →
vertigo	12–12	0.05	35%	21 Sept →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	19%	21 Sept →
cache	13–11	0.02	16%	21 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.06	27%	14 Sept →
vertigo	13–8	0.15	19%	14 Sept →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	21%	14 Sept →
cache	4–13	0.01	16%	14 Sept →
anubis	0–13	-0.08	17%	14 Sept →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	15%	13 Sept →
overpass	5–13	0.03	7%	13 Sept →
cache	11–13	-0.03	18%	13 Sept →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	27%	13 Sept →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	21%	13 Sept →
cache	11–13	0.01	11%	13 Sept →
cache	2–9	-0.07	13%	10 Sept →
vertigo	9–13	-0.04	19%	10 Sept →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	18%	10 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.03	24%	8 Sept →
overpass	2–13	-0.04	32%	8 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.02	14%	8 Sept →
cache	13–11	-0.03	15%	7 Sept →
vertigo	13–5	0.15	20%	7 Sept →