PHamous — CS2 Stats

76561198014581266[U:1:54315538]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

629Tracked matches21%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingClutch Specialist

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (43 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+71Tracked matches · now 629

−18.6ppWin rate · 40.0% → 21.4%

Rating over time

33Days played since 2026-07-10

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim47

Positioning52

Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD29–59–12Last 10029%Win rateLWLLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +2.1pp headshot accuracy · −59ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–4 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

3–7 · 30% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 528ms

Last 20

6–12–2 · 30% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+4.2 against its own average).

Aim4.7

Utility6.4

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch9.4

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 62% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 47% on T to 26% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7

Positioning5.2

Utility6.4

Mechanics3.9

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time543ms−41ms

first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms

Headshot accuracy14.9%−1.0%

first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 7 Oct →

32%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 22 Jul →

391msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · inferno, 8 Sept →

13–0Biggest win · cache, 13 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 54% over 24overpassWeakest map · 0% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	24	13–11	54%	0.01
inferno	D	22	7–15	32%	-0.00
vertigo	D	11	2–9	18%	-0.02
nuke	D	10	2–8	20%	-0.02
ancient	D	9	2–7	22%	-0.01
dust2	D	8	1–7	13%	-0.03
overpass	D	7	0–7	0%	-0.03
anubis	D	7	2–5	29%	0.00
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.08
mirage	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

10Matches

50%Win rate

0.97Avg K/D

64.2ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

67%1v1 clutch win

14%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	4	50%	0.76	10.8
Dust2	2	100%	1.04	15.5
Inferno	1	100%	1.56	14.0
Cache	1	0%	0.69	11.0
Nuke	1	0%	1.47	22.0
Ancient	1	0%	0.88	14.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy

31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.4%Spray accuracy

67.6%Counter-strafing

11.6°Preaim

542msReaction time

46.7%T opening success

25.6%CT opening success

0.55Enemies flashed / flash

4.4%Flash assists

10.76HE damage / grenade

9.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 25.5574% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	9–13	-0.04	12%	10 Oct →
inferno	13–1	-0.01	13%	10 Oct →
ancient	7–13	0.03	19%	10 Oct →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	27%	7 Oct →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	8%	7 Oct →
cache	13–2	0.21	17%	7 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.01	11%	5 Oct →
vertigo	1–13	-0.06	20%	5 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.01	18%	5 Oct →
inferno	5–13	0.00	19%	4 Oct →
cache	13–3	-0.03	11%	4 Oct →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	21%	4 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	14%	29 Sept →
vertigo	9–13	-0.08	10%	29 Sept →
cache	10–13	0.07	22%	29 Sept →
inferno	12–12	-0.01	11%	29 Sept →
nuke	13–7	0.03	10%	28 Sept →
dust2	13–5	-0.05	18%	26 Sept →
overpass	12–12	-0.04	12%	26 Sept →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	16%	26 Sept →
ancient	0–13	-0.09	0%	25 Sept →
vertigo	11–13	0.02	14%	25 Sept →
inferno	9–13	0.05	27%	25 Sept →
anubis	11–13	0.03	13%	25 Sept →
dust2	6–13	0.01	24%	25 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.06	11%	25 Sept →
overpass	6–13	-0.03	9%	24 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	14%	24 Sept →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	15%	24 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.01	19%	23 Sept →
overpass	9–13	-0.06	13%	23 Sept →
vertigo	8–13	-0.02	12%	23 Sept →
nuke	8–13	0.01	11%	23 Sept →
anubis	13–7	0.05	16%	22 Sept →
cache	10–13	0.03	14%	22 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	15%	22 Sept →
inferno	13–11	0.01	14%	21 Sept →
vertigo	12–12	-0.03	12%	21 Sept →
ancient	13–10	0.10	22%	21 Sept →
cache	13–11	-0.01	13%	21 Sept →
inferno	13–9	-0.00	10%	14 Sept →
vertigo	13–8	0.01	14%	14 Sept →
nuke	13–7	0.05	12%	14 Sept →
cache	4–13	-0.04	6%	14 Sept →
anubis	0–13	-0.07	29%	14 Sept →
inferno	4–13	-0.04	15%	13 Sept →
nuke	5–13	-0.09	11%	13 Sept →
cache	11–13	0.02	19%	13 Sept →
vertigo	7–13	-0.04	17%	13 Sept →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	27%	13 Sept →
cache	13–0	0.13	14%	13 Sept →
train	12–12	0.08	9%	13 Sept →
nuke	1–13	-0.04	0%	13 Sept →
inferno	9–13	0.03	13%	13 Sept →
cache	2–9	-0.03	9%	10 Sept →
vertigo	9–13	-0.03	13%	10 Sept →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	18%	10 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.01	17%	8 Sept →
overpass	2–13	-0.03	25%	8 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.08	29%	8 Sept →
cache	13–11	-0.03	23%	7 Sept →
vertigo	13–5	-0.02	13%	7 Sept →
nuke	12–12	-0.04	13%	7 Sept →
vertigo	12–12	-0.04	15%	6 Sept →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	19%	3 Sept →
anubis	10–13	0.03	17%	3 Sept →
ancient	8–13	0.01	10%	3 Sept →
dust2	2–13	-0.08	20%	1 Sept →
inferno	12–12	0.01	18%	1 Sept →
cache	13–7	-0.04	16%	1 Sept →
overpass	10–13	0.01	14%	26 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.04	9%	26 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.01	17%	26 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.02	18%	26 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.01	12%	25 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	11%	20 Aug →
nuke	12–12	-0.04	16%	20 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.04	24%	20 Aug →
overpass	12–12	-0.04	12%	18 Aug →
inferno	12–12	-0.05	9%	16 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	8%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.06	21%	12 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	8%	12 Aug →
cache	13–3	-0.01	17%	22 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	32%	22 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	17%	21 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.04	14%	17 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.07	17%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	21%	17 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.01	14%	16 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.02	17%	16 Jul →
overpass	12–12	-0.02	16%	14 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.02	16%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.03	12%	14 Jul →
vertigo	10–13	0.01	19%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.02	8%	13 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	18%	13 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.12	29%	13 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	10%	10 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	14%	10 Jul →