JOHN GLOCK

JOHN GLOCK — CS2 Stats

GB76561197973706368[U:1:13440640]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

354Tracked matches61%Win rate2023Tracked since
950Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating19,051Top 50% of 212,379 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#98191 of 259202 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Jan 2026 (299 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,051 -1,753 24 Nov – 6 Jan · 22 days played
18,63424,102peak 24,10224 Nov6 Jan
24,102Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2024-11-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,051 below peak (24,102)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 949 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate52.9%44.4%46.9%above
Shot accuracy15.6%11.9%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.291.031.08above
Match win rate46.2%45.2%46.7%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Pink band player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJOHN GLOCKPREMIER19,051 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning46
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateWWLWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −7.9pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 615ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility3.7
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.6
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact8.6

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time596ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy27.3%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 27.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–7 · nuke, 2 Mar →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 0–2 · nuke, 21 Dec →
430msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · overpass, 29 Dec →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 22 Dec →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
10–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
19Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2213–959%0.01
ancientA2011–955%0.01
anubisC207–1335%0.00
dust2A148–657%0.01
infernoS96–367%-0.01
mirageA95–456%-0.00
train—22–0100%0.02
overpass—21–150%0.06
vertigo—21–150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,392Lifetime kills
1.29K/D · Top 25% of Purple band
2,082Matches
46.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Purple band
52.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Purple band
15.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Purple band
5,176MVPs
950Hours (in match)
1,526Bombs planted
656Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,259dust2
3,549inferno
3,512nuke
684train
413cbble
376vertigo
61bank
58lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches
60%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
75.2ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.6%Headshot accuracy
29.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
597msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
36.8%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
8.03HE damage / grenade
8.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.6756% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–80.0637%6 Jan →
inferno13–60.0314%4 Jan →
nuke1–13-0.0635%4 Jan →
nuke13–110.0223%4 Jan →
dust26–13-0.0126%4 Jan →
ancient13–70.0224%31 Dec →
mirage13–100.0423%31 Dec →
train16–130.0415%31 Dec →
dust216–130.0117%30 Dec →
inferno5–13-0.0625%30 Dec →
overpass5–130.1235%30 Dec →
dust213–30.1020%30 Dec →
nuke8–130.0133%30 Dec →
overpass13–30.0123%29 Dec →
dust210–13-0.0334%29 Dec →
dust213–60.0828%29 Dec →
nuke4–13-0.0628%21 Dec →
inferno13–90.0014%21 Dec →
nuke0–20.0167%21 Dec →
dust212–120.0235%21 Dec →
ancient13–160.0220%27 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0718%16 Mar →
dust215–15-0.0121%15 Mar →
ancient13–8-0.0431%15 Mar →
ancient13–80.0431%15 Mar →
nuke16–140.0126%15 Mar →
nuke13–40.0622%8 Mar →
nuke16–12-0.0330%8 Mar →
anubis10–130.0033%8 Mar →
ancient13–100.0625%7 Mar →
nuke13–70.1537%2 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.1125%2 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.0826%24 Feb →
nuke13–3-0.0031%24 Feb →
mirage13–110.0137%23 Feb →
anubis11–13-0.0219%23 Feb →
train16–140.0118%23 Feb →
mirage10–130.0237%23 Feb →
anubis3–130.0226%17 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0327%16 Feb →
anubis8–13-0.0227%16 Feb →
inferno13–60.0040%16 Feb →
anubis13–40.0126%16 Feb →
anubis13–40.1332%16 Feb →
mirage13–50.0021%15 Feb →
ancient16–140.0322%9 Feb →
nuke12–16-0.0337%9 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0217%9 Feb →
anubis11–13-0.0125%9 Feb →
dust213–50.0033%9 Feb →
anubis13–7-0.0410%2 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0017%2 Feb →
dust213–6-0.0127%2 Feb →
ancient13–70.0835%2 Feb →
inferno16–14-0.0217%31 Jan →
ancient14–16-0.0332%31 Jan →
nuke9–130.0732%30 Jan →
ancient12–16-0.0223%27 Jan →
mirage6–13-0.0044%27 Jan →
nuke16–140.0617%21 Jan →
anubis9–130.0524%21 Jan →
anubis13–80.0429%21 Jan →
ancient7–13-0.0619%21 Jan →
ancient10–130.0534%21 Jan →
dust211–13-0.0129%20 Jan →
inferno10–130.0222%20 Jan →
anubis15–15-0.0224%31 Dec →
nuke13–100.0323%29 Dec →
ancient13–50.0334%29 Dec →
anubis13–50.0212%29 Dec →
anubis8–13-0.0220%29 Dec →
nuke13–6-0.0024%29 Dec →
nuke11–13-0.0319%29 Dec →
vertigo13–90.0225%29 Dec →
ancient11–130.0128%29 Dec →
ancient13–6-0.0213%29 Dec →
anubis8–13-0.0733%22 Dec →
ancient13–40.0630%22 Dec →
dust27–13-0.0123%22 Dec →
nuke16–120.0539%22 Dec →
dust213–70.0015%22 Dec →
nuke13–70.0235%22 Dec →
mirage13–00.0428%22 Dec →
mirage13–6-0.0133%21 Dec →
vertigo5–13-0.0621%21 Dec →
nuke9–130.0225%21 Dec →
anubis15–15-0.0021%20 Dec →
anubis16–140.0022%20 Dec →
ancient13–70.0421%20 Dec →
nuke13–40.0337%20 Dec →
mirage11–13-0.0231%14 Dec →
ancient5–13-0.0523%7 Dec →
anubis13–70.0122%7 Dec →
ancient4–130.0126%7 Dec →
anubis10–13-0.0125%30 Nov →
dust213–9-0.0322%30 Nov →
nuke14–160.0137%24 Nov →
dust213–90.0125%24 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0219%24 Nov →
ancient16–12-0.0130%24 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.