DEFiANT~

DEFiANT~ — CS2 Stats

76561197973271480[U:1:13005752]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,845Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,880Top 50% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#69209 of 252708 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Oct 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,845 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,880 +1,740 13 Jul – 3 Oct · 25 days played
19,14022,940peak 22,94013 Jul3 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,792 +0 2 Sept – 3 Oct · 3 observations
1,7921,792peak 1,7922 Sept3 Oct
23,415Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,792Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-07-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,792
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 209 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,060 below peak (22,940)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,740 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,120 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDEFiANT~PREMIER20,880 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,792csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning53
Utility82

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–45–2Last 10053%Win rateLWWLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.1pp headshot accuracy · −73ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 477ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+4 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility8.2
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 82 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.3
Utility8.2
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time527ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 8–0 · mirage, 26 Aug →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 8–0 · mirage, 26 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · ancient, 29 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 2 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
8–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2515–1060%0.02
dust2C2310–1343%0.01
anubisA138–562%0.01
infernoC135–838%-0.01
cacheA116–555%-0.01
nukeA95–456%-0.01
ancientS64–267%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,062Matches
53%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
72.7ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust25558%1.1214.3
Mirage5461%0.9313.4
Anubis3639%0.9614.2
Ancient2646%0.8112.5
Inferno2438%0.8912.1
Nuke1650%0.9612.5
Vertigo1443%1.0315.1
Train10%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
525msReaction time
18.1%T opening success
41.6%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
10.96HE damage / grenade
23.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.0575% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–130.0216%30 Aug →
dust213–70.0615%30 Aug →
dust213–50.0311%30 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0311%30 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0126%30 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0221%29 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0918%29 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0313%26 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0210%26 Aug →
ancient13–70.097%26 Aug →
cache13–16-0.0214%26 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0424%26 Aug →
cache13–110.0626%26 Aug →
mirage8–00.1538%26 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.068%26 Aug →
mirage13–70.0015%26 Aug →
dust213–50.1122%11 Aug →
dust210–130.048%7 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.057%6 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0026%6 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0611%6 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0315%5 Aug →
nuke13–50.0126%5 Aug →
inferno14–160.0320%5 Aug →
mirage13–30.0918%5 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0116%5 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0410%5 Aug →
mirage16–140.018%5 Aug →
inferno13–90.0415%5 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0317%5 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0316%5 Aug →
dust213–100.0112%5 Aug →
cache16–140.0317%4 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.048%4 Aug →
anubis13–30.0614%4 Aug →
anubis13–80.057%4 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0114%4 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0624%3 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0424%3 Aug →
mirage13–60.0814%3 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.008%3 Aug →
dust23–0-0.030%3 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0513%3 Aug →
cache14–16-0.0423%3 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.017%3 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0122%2 Aug →
inferno13–110.0333%2 Aug →
mirage13–10.0317%2 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0322%2 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0417%2 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0119%1 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0014%1 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0115%31 Jul →
cache16–130.0112%31 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0411%31 Jul →
nuke13–10.059%31 Jul →
anubis13–100.1017%31 Jul →
ancient13–4-0.039%31 Jul →
anubis16–140.0615%30 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.019%30 Jul →
mirage3–130.1223%30 Jul →
ancient13–50.0611%29 Jul →
ancient13–60.096%29 Jul →
dust20–13-0.0913%29 Jul →
dust214–160.0114%29 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0314%28 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.047%28 Jul →
inferno4–130.0310%27 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0313%27 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0216%27 Jul →
dust213–110.1312%27 Jul →
mirage13–10.0516%27 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0416%27 Jul →
nuke13–90.0224%27 Jul →
anubis13–30.0536%27 Jul →
cache11–130.0114%25 Jul →
anubis13–4-0.008%24 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.075%24 Jul →
mirage13–90.0118%24 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0413%24 Jul →
mirage7–00.067%24 Jul →
inferno4–00.000%24 Jul →
cache16–13-0.0113%24 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0120%21 Jul →
dust28–13-0.065%15 Jul →
mirage13–20.0712%15 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0715%15 Jul →
dust28–13-0.014%15 Jul →
mirage13–110.0413%15 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.013%15 Jul →
inferno16–14-0.0115%15 Jul →
cache3–13-0.028%14 Jul →
dust213–70.0227%14 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0118%14 Jul →
dust211–130.0319%14 Jul →
mirage13–90.0014%14 Jul →
mirage13–60.0214%14 Jul →
dust213–70.0829%14 Jul →
cache1–13-0.0713%13 Jul →
dust213–70.0917%13 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.