jorgooni

jorgooni — CS2 Stats

76561197973168858[U:1:12903130]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,034Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#41248 of 251273 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,073 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,045 -1,955 2 Jan – 26 Apr · 12 days played
22,56525,724peak 25,7242 Jan26 Apr
26,075Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,073Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-01-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,073
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 427 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjorgooniFACEITLevel 9 · 2,073 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,073csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning43
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50–50Last 10050%Win rateWWLWWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating · +3.5pp headshot accuracy · −54ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 632ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility6.5
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.3
Utility6.5
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time627ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 26 Aug →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · mirage, 26 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 3 Jan →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 26 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 32infernoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S3222–1069%0.01
ancientB2010–1050%0.01
mirageC145–936%0.03
anubisC135–838%0.00
infernoD93–633%0.00
nukeA74–357%0.01
train—31–233%0.01
cache—20–20%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

656Matches
57%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
84.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
19Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient14159%1.2518.1
Dust211557%1.1917.1
Anubis11159%1.3618.1
Mirage10962%1.2115.5
Inferno7348%1.2817.0
Nuke5452%1.1616.0
Train2157%1.3115.8
Cache520%0.7311.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
618msReaction time
29.4%T opening success
35.3%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
10.3%Flash assists
10.74HE damage / grenade
11.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.4259% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–110.0115%24 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0420%4 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0310%26 Aug →
mirage13–10.1736%26 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0318%31 Jul →
dust213–30.0732%8 Jul →
ancient13–100.0218%8 Jul →
dust213–80.0920%5 Jul →
ancient7–130.0219%15 May →
mirage9–130.0321%15 May →
dust25–13-0.1025%15 May →
nuke0–13-0.0323%15 May →
ancient1–13-0.119%15 May →
anubis0–13-0.120%15 May →
nuke7–13-0.0421%15 May →
dust213–90.0327%5 May →
cache7–13-0.0321%5 May →
dust213–110.0615%5 May →
inferno8–13-0.0424%4 May →
ancient9–13-0.0512%3 May →
anubis6–13-0.0225%3 May →
cache8–13-0.0310%3 May →
dust213–70.1330%26 Apr →
mirage13–80.0925%25 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0225%25 Apr →
dust210–130.0621%20 Apr →
dust213–50.0427%16 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0125%6 Apr →
nuke13–60.0128%6 Apr →
anubis17–190.0314%6 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0529%6 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0012%5 Apr →
anubis13–30.1020%5 Apr →
ancient16–120.0920%5 Apr →
dust213–40.029%3 Apr →
mirage13–80.0420%3 Apr →
dust213–70.0320%2 Apr →
anubis3–130.0415%2 Apr →
ancient11–130.0215%28 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0322%21 Mar →
dust214–160.0829%21 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0318%21 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0126%21 Mar →
ancient11–130.0422%20 Mar →
dust216–14-0.0027%6 Mar →
ancient13–100.0522%28 Feb →
dust213–11-0.0319%28 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0012%22 Feb →
anubis13–30.0111%15 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0115%14 Feb →
dust28–130.0124%14 Feb →
anubis6–13-0.0423%14 Feb →
dust213–11-0.009%14 Feb →
dust213–110.0010%14 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0317%12 Feb →
ancient13–100.0120%12 Feb →
nuke4–13-0.0614%12 Feb →
dust25–13-0.0115%12 Feb →
inferno3–130.0114%12 Feb →
ancient13–80.0722%12 Feb →
dust210–130.0320%12 Feb →
anubis6–130.0616%12 Feb →
dust213–50.0826%11 Feb →
anubis8–13-0.0611%11 Feb →
ancient14–160.0218%10 Feb →
dust213–8-0.0328%10 Feb →
inferno3–13-0.0721%10 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0229%10 Feb →
ancient13–40.1224%10 Feb →
nuke13–80.0611%10 Feb →
mirage13–60.0615%10 Feb →
dust211–13-0.0019%10 Feb →
dust213–80.0127%7 Feb →
anubis13–90.0413%31 Jan →
mirage4–13-0.0424%26 Jan →
nuke13–00.0731%26 Jan →
ancient13–100.0021%26 Jan →
ancient1–13-0.1213%26 Jan →
nuke13–70.0522%22 Jan →
inferno13–50.1223%22 Jan →
dust213–100.0121%22 Jan →
mirage4–130.0532%17 Jan →
dust23–13-0.0217%17 Jan →
dust213–160.0324%16 Jan →
ancient13–3-0.0110%16 Jan →
anubis13–110.0414%11 Jan →
mirage4–13-0.087%11 Jan →
ancient13–70.0320%11 Jan →
inferno11–13-0.0713%10 Jan →
dust213–11-0.0027%10 Jan →
train13–90.0931%10 Jan →
ancient13–90.0628%4 Jan →
inferno13–40.0523%4 Jan →
ancient8–130.0124%3 Jan →
inferno13–60.0716%3 Jan →
mirage13–60.1315%3 Jan →
train11–130.0127%3 Jan →
ancient4–13-0.0535%2 Jan →
mirage11–130.0315%2 Jan →
train11–13-0.0721%2 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.