quMp

quMp — CS2 Stats

FI76561197973119479[U:1:12853751]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,648Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,354 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,354 → 2,354
+6Tracked matches · now 3,648
0.0ppWin rate · 58.6% → 58.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 21 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,643 -3,733 21 Feb6 Jul · 7 days played
23,14227,376peak 27,37621 Feb6 Jul
27,376Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,354Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-02-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,354
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 146 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGquMpFACEITLevel 10 · 2,354 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,354csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning50
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58411Last 10058%Win rateWLWLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −6.2pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility7.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.2

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.0
Utility7.6
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time580ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy27.4%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 29.0% → last ⅓ avg 27.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 13 Jun
55%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · ancient, 13 Apr
414msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · ancient, 11 Jul
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 30 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
910In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 65% over 20anubisWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA27171063%0.00
dust2S2013765%-0.02
ancientA1710759%0.02
anubisC1661038%-0.01
infernoA106460%0.01
cacheA74357%-0.01
mirage21150%0.10
overpass110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,018Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
75.9ADR
60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis24947%0.9915.2
Nuke24255%1.0815.3
Ancient23355%1.0515.4
Dust221148%0.9714.8
Inferno9753%1.0014.7
Train4154%0.9315.5
Cache4055%1.0415.1
Mirage3936%0.8613.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.1%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
75.9%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
582msReaction time
27.7%T opening success
45.0%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
14.8%Flash assists
10.34HE damage / grenade
12.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.6884% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke19–17-0.0121%23 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0216%23 Aug
nuke13–110.0440%20 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0515%20 Aug
cache9–13-0.0331%20 Aug
cache13–9-0.0326%19 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0715%15 Aug
cache13–110.0439%15 Aug
dust213–6-0.015%14 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0521%14 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0221%2 Aug
nuke13–60.0234%2 Aug
cache1–13-0.0717%17 Jul
anubis15–150.0127%17 Jul
nuke13–70.1033%17 Jul
dust213–80.0342%17 Jul
ancient13–10.0430%16 Jul
ancient13–20.0937%15 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0323%14 Jul
dust26–13-0.0725%13 Jul
cache9–13-0.0219%13 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0135%13 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0516%13 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0727%13 Jul
dust213–70.0124%13 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0328%11 Jul
dust213–70.0339%6 Jul
dust216–13-0.0027%1 Jul
nuke13–100.0140%29 Jun
dust213–8-0.0136%29 Jun
dust21–13-0.1133%29 Jun
ancient17–190.0131%28 Jun
cache13–50.0232%25 Jun
dust211–13-0.0232%24 Jun
dust213–70.0252%24 Jun
nuke13–60.0443%24 Jun
inferno16–140.0431%24 Jun
nuke19–16-0.0121%23 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0043%17 Jun
overpass19–16-0.0231%13 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0026%13 Jun
dust24–13-0.0231%13 Jun
mirage13–20.2041%13 Jun
ancient8–130.0135%13 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0229%7 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0528%7 Jun
dust213–60.0231%7 Jun
dust213–40.0823%16 May
nuke13–7-0.0128%16 May
cache13–8-0.0114%11 May
inferno13–30.0544%11 May
dust213–80.0132%10 May
dust27–13-0.0828%8 May
nuke6–13-0.0516%25 Apr
ancient13–40.1328%25 Apr
ancient17–19-0.0425%21 Apr
ancient13–60.0534%19 Apr
anubis16–120.0323%18 Apr
ancient13–50.0628%18 Apr
anubis8–130.0135%18 Apr
dust26–13-0.1132%18 Apr
nuke13–3-0.0032%16 Apr
anubis19–170.0326%16 Apr
dust213–10-0.0521%16 Apr
nuke28–25-0.0223%16 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0241%15 Apr
mirage11–130.0139%15 Apr
ancient13–110.0126%15 Apr
anubis11–130.0318%13 Apr
ancient13–110.0255%13 Apr
nuke13–100.0234%9 Apr
anubis19–160.0125%8 Apr
dust213–10-0.0521%7 Apr
anubis13–70.0638%5 Apr
inferno1–13-0.0324%5 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0140%5 Apr
ancient13–16-0.0530%5 Apr
nuke7–130.0020%5 Apr
dust213–11-0.0217%30 Mar
anubis13–60.0113%30 Mar
nuke13–00.0748%30 Mar
ancient13–30.1215%30 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0033%30 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0720%30 Mar
nuke13–90.0320%28 Mar
nuke13–100.0324%26 Mar
nuke13–100.0633%26 Mar
inferno13–80.0146%26 Mar
anubis9–130.0132%13 Mar
dust26–13-0.0231%13 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0615%13 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0539%13 Mar
inferno13–50.0337%11 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0132%11 Mar
ancient13–90.0014%11 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0018%6 Mar
inferno11–130.0330%6 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0440%27 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0339%27 Feb
ancient13–90.0030%21 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →